Tucker Carlson Talks Potential Election Fraud

Rumble link

Tucker Carlson discusses some of the information coming from Georgia including footage from election workers, duplicated ballots, and fabricated documents.

Enjoy.

The Arizona Senate President will have an announcement tomorrow morning!

a reply to: projectvxn

Tucker had better get his resume ready, if he plans to continue asserting that election fraud possibly occurred.

His employer (FoxNews) was in on it.

a reply to: carewemust

I dont think FOX will get rid of him by firing if Tucker goes away fox news ratings go in the same way CNN ratings are currently.

Tucker has being an interesting voice on the network and also someone who had being agaisnt the Libyan intervention.

a reply to: projectvxn

This is disgusting. And also saddening that many democrats are okay with it. They don't want recounts, they don't want the truth to get out. Even the audit was screwed up. Horrible.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: projectvxn

Tucker had better get his resume ready, if he plans to continue asserting that election fraud possibly occurred.

His employer (FoxNews) was in on it.

I remember watching election night a bit on Faux. It was quite a bit before Arizona was official. Don't know the woman's name, just remember a blonde woman (Yes I know, that doesn't help any heh) hastily and quite happily projecting as the onscreen count was heading towards the 270 saying, (probably not word for word) "That's it! That's it! That's 270, Biden won, Biden won! She was in SUCH a hurry to project Biden as winner. It was rather odd.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: projectvxn

Tucker had better get his resume ready, if he plans to continue asserting that election fraud possibly occurred.

His employer (FoxNews) was in on it.

They have been pushing him out for a while....hence the spinoff show....

a reply to: projectvxn

Democrats don't believe in fair elections

Hillary's "Resistance", "By ANY means necessary", remember ?
How is this not insurrection ?
How could you expect anything else than the fraud that happenned ?


But, in Democrats' minds, it was HER turn because Bill cheated on her and Trump took away her rightful "crown", and so needed to be "punished" in the 2020 election.


Child-like, middle school behaviour to be expected from the crowd that, in AOC's words, deserves money even if they do not want to work....

originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: carewemust

I dont think FOX will get rid of him by firing if Tucker goes away fox news ratings go in the same way CNN ratings are currently.

Tucker has being an interesting voice on the network and also someone who had being agaisnt the Libyan intervention.

If Tucker Carlson reveals that Fox News's President donated to the Joe Biden presidential campaign, and how FoxNews worked with the Federal Debate Commission to have anchor Chris Wallace "go easy" on Biden in the Trump-Biden debate, he will be forced out, or worse.

It was revealed last week that Intelligence agencies specifically targeted Tucker Carlson. I hope he's not married, and has no children. These agencies shut people up by threatening their family.

originally posted by: Kaiju666

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: projectvxn

Tucker had better get his resume ready, if he plans to continue asserting that election fraud possibly occurred.

His employer (FoxNews) was in on it.

I remember watching election night a bit on Faux. It was quite a bit before Arizona was official. Don't know the woman's name, just remember a blonde woman (Yes I know, that doesn't help any heh) hastily and quite happily projecting as the onscreen count was heading towards the 270 saying, (probably not word for word) "That's it! That's it! That's 270, Biden won, Biden won! She was in SUCH a hurry to project Biden as winner. It was rather odd.

I watched FoxNews closely that night too. Right up to when President Trump emerged to declare Joe didn't win, at about 5am Eastern time.

I recall what you're talking about, and also how FoxNews executive Arnon Mishkin gave the order to call Arizona for Biden, before any other network or outlet.

Here's one aspect of Mishkin's election-night controversy: www.washingtonpost.com...

Maybe you recall the FoxNews host-lady bringing Arnon Mishkin on the air at about 3:30am to explain why the network was calling some states for Biden, even though Trump had a healthy lead?

I vividly remember his response...."We're expecting more ballots to be brought in to the counting centers, with most of them being for candidate Joe Biden."

It didn't dawn on me how profound of a statement that was, until viewing what happened that night in hindsight.

BTW...here's additional info on Arnon Mishkin. He's a true-blue Democrat.

CNN doesn't employ Republicans, but FoxNews is loaded with Democrats: www.jweekly.com...

originally posted by: Vasa Croe

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: projectvxn

Tucker had better get his resume ready, if he plans to continue asserting that election fraud possibly occurred.

His employer (FoxNews) was in on it.

They have been pushing him out for a while....hence the spinoff show....

After seeing with my own eyes how FoxNews helped push Joe Biden over the finish-line first on November 3rd/4th, and then bad-mouth President Trump for daring to suggest that fraud helped Biden win, I stopped watching them.

Haven't seen a segment of Hannity or Tucker Carlson since December. FoxNews, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell are all against what's best for the American people.

If Donald Trump wants to be President again, he needs to figure out how to get rid of ALL the selfish Republicans in the Senate and House. To tell us (the voters) who should be put out of a job.

Trump won.
The way I see it our only two options are to all quit our jobs and stop paying taxes, or make the guilty pay. Anyone got a better idea?

a reply to: projectvxn

Speaking generally here, what does everyone believe would be the outcome should actual, tangible, indictable evidence become apparent?

Would Trump get installed because I'm not sure of any policy mechanism for that to happen?

Will people go to jail? Last politician i can remember was Weiner and in fairly sure that was only because HRCs best buddy wanted a divorce.

Personally I believe nothing will happen just like our own SCOTUS refused to hear cases from states where their legislatures were bypassed to suit their own means.


Thanks for the soapbox.

a reply to: JinMI

If they don’t do anything about it why would anyone follow any law ever again?
How long can you rule an armed citizenry that knows youre not legally in charge?
We might as let Xi or Putin step in and rule.....I bet they’d do a better job than Biden/Harris.

Did you know there’s places in California where theft under 900$ isn’t even jailable offense?
Why would anyone pay for anything?

a reply to: NotGuilty

What would your thoughts be if I told you that our VP promoted and advertised that rioters would get free bail and charges likely dropped for their vagrants?


We are already in a two tiered justice system, shall we try for a third?

a reply to: NotGuilty

Well if you google when you dont have a account you can easily find a interesting story. About the election being fortified or something in between?

a reply to: JinMI

You’re smarter than me, Jin. What do you think we should do? I’m just a dumb hammer and all I see is nails.
The only thing I got going for me is I’m not afraid.

originally posted by: NotGuilty
a reply to: JinMI

You’re smarter than me, Jin. What do you think we should do? I’m just a dumb hammer and all I see is nails.
The only thing I got going for me is I’m not afraid.

Do? If I knew that I wouldn't be cutting steel for a living!

As a cynic all I can say is to hope for the best but actively prepare for the worse and lookout for your friends and family if you're able.

a reply to: projectvxn

Thanks for posting the link! I wanted to see what Tucker had to see, but I didn't want to give Fox any hits.

With all the new information coming out -- on top of what was already known -- it is impossible to honestly claim there was no wrongdoing. We know better. There is proof all over the place now.

The only questions remaining are how much wrongdoing, was it enough to alter the rightful outcome of the election, and who is responsible -- both civilly and criminally.

And, of course, how do we fix it???