Hey Fauci! If you weren't such an idiot, you would "get" this

So a vaccine in theory provokes a response to teach your body how to produce the antibodies needed to survive right?

So if I have already had covid and I am carrying the antibodies right now why do I need the jabs? To force my body to produce more so they learn.... What?

Personally I am not taking the fizer, or moderna, or J&J if I can help it Why... simple the information looks to much like cooking the books, I cannot give informed consent when a lot of data is hidden or adjusted, Nova looks promising and it uses a more traditional method, they still have a chance to get approved by the FDA for emergency use so here is to hoping.

So you aren't capable of understanding science as fraudshy believes and your country folk can't understand how to use office tech either apparently so kamel horseshoe.
Here in Australia once our pm came back from the latest elite get together he has gone full blown dedicated to getting us all vaccinated and he said anyone can get the astrazenica poison no matter what age they are, which then created a furore in our state as our health minister said unequivocally that she doesn't want any of us under 50 especially the 20 to 30 yr group as they know that is too dangerous for them so we have our pm saying this and our state health minister is saying another thing. And they wonder why we aren't racing off to get our shot.
They can kiss it.

a reply to: carewemust

100% of humans die

a reply to: Havamal

originally posted by: NotGuilty

originally posted by: Erno86
a reply to: network dude

On a national TV news station yesterday...they said

Then sadly, it probably wasn’t true

Hmmm...

"Forget Pfizer and Moderna...white nationalism appears to be one hell of a drug."

Haha, just seen the new term, "Faucism". Brilliant! ...whomever coined it.

a reply to: network dude

I really want to know why having natural antibodies isn't being brought to light? And why testing for both a vaccinated person and a person that recovered from Covid should be the standard?

originally posted by: MiaBandetoh
a reply to: network dude

I really want to know why having natural antibodies isn't being brought to light? And why testing for both a vaccinated person and a person that recovered from Covid should be the standard?

'

it seems important enough to be a factor. If I had covid already, and recovered, then my risk is over. I may not need to risk getting the shot. And I do realize the risk is small, but I also realize that in not taking the shot, my risk is exactly zero. Even by country math, zero is a low number.

a reply to: Havamal
No one gives a # what you say

😂what a joke you are.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: MiaBandetoh
a reply to: network dude

I really want to know why having natural antibodies isn't being brought to light? And why testing for both a vaccinated person and a person that recovered from Covid should be the standard?

'

it seems important enough to be a factor. If I had covid already, and recovered, then my risk is over. I may not need to risk getting the shot. And I do realize the risk is small, but I also realize that in not taking the shot, my risk is exactly zero. Even by country math, zero is a low number.

This is very much something that we can agree on so be aware of who you alienate...just a suggestion

Anyway I gave blood back when they were testing for Antibodies and had positive Antibodies that should be proof enough that I have had Covid and recovered and my body had the proper response. I am in a slight at risk category and do not want to take the shot so as not to experience an adverse reaction. However I am seeing very little that natural immunity means anything, in fact just the opposite which was unheard of only a few years ago...

a reply to: MiaBandetoh

I respond how I'm spoken to. I don't alienate based on politics. Some of my best friends are...... kidding, I don't have any lefty friends. But I respect the ones who argue with facts and conviction, and not name calling and ridicule. And when I'm on my period, I can be super cranky. (being bloated sucks)

Notice how I didn't call you names here?


ETA: but as to your point, I feel the same. I'm not anti vax, and I don't think this vaccine was made to do nefarious things, although I am perplexed at how hard it's being pushed on a population that seems to not need it as hard as it's being pushed.

Plus, I'm betting on the vaccine killing off all of the male species that took it, and there will only be a few of us men left to re-populate the world. I'm here to do my part if needed.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: MiaBandetoh

I respond how I'm spoken to. I don't alienate based on politics. Some of my best friends are...... kidding, I don't have any lefty friends. But I respect the ones who argue with facts and conviction, and not name calling and ridicule. And when I'm on my period, I can be super cranky. (being bloated sucks)

Notice how I didn't call you names here?

You forgot to mention overheated...

Back to the subject at hand. I have lost trust in most scientists/biologists/virologists on this issue (not in science although how do you trust those that create the illness to be the ones to cure it?). I recall most saying in the past the body was what we learn from and emulate. The body will heal it's self and find resilience to an infection we may need to help it along with a vaccine or other counter measures but it is immunity and it's natural ability to heal that will cure/save a person...

a reply to: MiaBandetoh

Since I was a wee little cable dog, I learned that we had the Flu vaccine because it would trigger a response in our immune system to make antibodies to fight off the infection of flu. So we can either get the flu, get over it, and have the antibodies, or take the flu shot. (which may or may not be the correct strain for the year, as it's based on a best guess)

So unless science has changed, and nobody told anyone, that's still how the vaccine's work. And still how the human body works.

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: MiaBandetoh
a reply to: network dude

I really want to know why having natural antibodies isn't being brought to light? And why testing for both a vaccinated person and a person that recovered from Covid should be the standard?

'

it seems important enough to be a factor. If I had covid already, and recovered, then my risk is over. I may not need to risk getting the shot. And I do realize the risk is small, but I also realize that in not taking the shot, my risk is exactly zero. Even by country math, zero is a low number.

There has been some confirmed cases of reinfection with COVID-19 --- Though rare...

originally posted by: Erno86

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: MiaBandetoh
a reply to: network dude

I really want to know why having natural antibodies isn't being brought to light? And why testing for both a vaccinated person and a person that recovered from Covid should be the standard?

'

it seems important enough to be a factor. If I had covid already, and recovered, then my risk is over. I may not need to risk getting the shot. And I do realize the risk is small, but I also realize that in not taking the shot, my risk is exactly zero. Even by country math, zero is a low number.

There has been some confirmed cases of reinfection with COVID-19 --- Though rare...

Yes, and there have been vaccinated people die from Covid, though rare....