Graphene Oxide: The actual contents inside Pfizer vials exposed

Much better to believe the experts who drive up to Scotland whilst in the midst of lockdown, and then further drive to a castle to 'check their eyesight is suitable for driving'. Real scientific.

originally posted by: nonspecific
Wearing a mask is a bit uncomfortable so it's easier to use human rights or claim they don't work so as to feel justified by not wearing one.

Not really, I looked at the evidence and concluded masks are ineffective, therefore never wore one. Not to mention the vast majority re-use soggy disposable ones for weeks on end, or the fact the boxes they come in explicitly stating does not offer any protection from covid19.

Watching wimbledon on tv, the presenters all sit/stand 2 metres from each other? Why? They've all been forced to have the vaccine so they should be good right? The hundreds of spectators have presumably been forced the vaccine and sit shoulder to shoulder for hours on end. But the grounds people and security guards dotted around are wearing masks..?

Random rule set which makes no sense on any level.

Perhaps it was a pandumic rather than a pandemic all along?

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Sh!t. When do I die?

Better yet, what about us who don't buy the mask/distance/vax BS - when do we die? I've been watching the homeless population to see when we are all gonna drop dead, funny thing they have been doing just fine ignoring all the rules. In fact their numbers keep growing. It's a miracle!

How can we have a rational discussion when you believe we are being lied to about almost everything by almost everyone?

That's such a wild and disprovable claim there isn't really much point in continuing is there?

Just to try and get an understanding what would you say almost actually is? 99%, 99.5%?

If we are talking about facts based on reality then why not hit me with some big ones you think I've missed somehow?

Really really big facts that can show without any reasonable doubt that I am wrong in this.

Take some time, put together something that will really make me look like a moron.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: nonspecific
in reply to RazorV66
How can it be sound advice if your not a doctor though?

Because it doesn't require a medical degree to understand?

Do you require advice from a medical doctor before deciding what to have for breakfast?

I'd take your advice on something you have credentials for but you can't expect people to choose random bloke on conspiracy site over medical professionals really can you?

Again - the ability to engage in logical rational thought does not require credentials of any kind.

It does require facts based in reality in order to reach a factual conclusion though, and that is a big problem here - we are being lied to, by almost everyone in any position of authority, about everything (not just these jabs).

Did Dr Malone invent Mnra vaccenes or not?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: nonspecific
I am concerned as to his validity and intentions somewhat though given his claims as to being the inventor of mRNA vaccenes as although he made some very important breakthroughs from what I understand he certainly did not invent the vaccene process as it is now.

He has never claimed to have invented these particular jabs. that is a fake-news talking point designed solely to attempt to discredit him.

He invented the technology used to create them.

The technology can have any number of essentially unlimited applications, these jabs being just one - or is it just one? Who knows, they could have 150 different versions identified by batch number, as an experiment to see which ones work better for whatever their purpose is.

The bottom line is, the only reason I am anti-vaxx at all, is the same reason I am against these non-vaxx jabs:

I do not trust those who are manufacturing them, or pushing them. At all. Ever. Period.

a reply to: rickymouse

here's another paper, all i searched for is, are graphenes toxic. it's a older paper 2016 so there mightbe more current info.
it says that is toxic and more studies are needed in other areas of the body

bold is mine

Conclusions

In the past few years, GFNs have been widely utilized in a wide range of technological and biomedical fields. Currently, most experiments have focused on the toxicity of GFNs in the lungs and livers. Therefore, studies of brain injury or neurotoxicity deserve more attention in the future. Many experiments have shown that GFNs have toxic side effects in many biological applications, but the in-depth study of toxicity mechanisms is urgently needed. In addition, contrasting results regarding the toxicity of GFNs need to be addressed by effective experimental methods and systematic studies. This review provides an overview of the toxicity of GFNs by summarizing the toxicokinetics, toxicity mechanisms and influencing factors and aimed to provide information to facilitate thorough research on the in vitro and in vivo haemo- and biocompatibility of GFNs in the future. This review will help address safety concerns before the clinical and therapeutic applications of GFNs, which will be important for further development of GFNs in biological applications.

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms

The way this 'pandemic' is being treated is a joke. The masks that are handed out in hospitals, the ones most people are wearing, do nothing to prevent covid infection. The six foot rule is a joke since it is only applied when its convenient, certainly not if you are a whiny liberal out Burning-Looting-Murdering.

This is an excuse the current administration can use for a massive money/power grab. It is political. If this so-called pandemic were real people would be forced to wear N-95 masks at a minimum. Congress wouldn't set foot out of their mansions without them. Yet they wear cloth masks that prevent nothing. If they so obviously aren't worried about a "pandemic" but are pushing vaccines that may actually be mandated you have to ask yourself why.

I have to stop short of saying the vaccine is intended to kill people because I cant prove it. But I would really like to see an MSDS on all the vaccines. What goes on the label and what is in the MSDS are usually two different things.

i also remember that there was a thing about graphene coated masks.

Coronavirus masks containing graphene should not be sold, Canadian health authorities say

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
i also remember that there was a thing about graphene coated masks.

Coronavirus masks containing graphene should not be sold, Canadian health authorities say

Its one companies mask from China. The filters break down and allow people to inhale graphene. Any large quantity that enters the lungs will cause damage. If you inhale sand it will cause ligions and possibly kill you. The lungs do not have a way to remove particles that enter the lungs except exhaling. So you need to avoid inhaling any particulates.

Heres the recalled china masks, healthycanadians.gc.ca...

a reply to: nonspecific

You cant win people believe what they will. I have posted you couldnt put graphene oxide in a shot and the next post someone comes on and says there trying to kill us.

Graphene oxide is used for filters for example britta water filters. graphene makes a great barrier it can be used to say filter out everything but water. It could not be in a shot because if i make graphene oxide it will form layers. You can break them apart using sound but they will reform. Id say within 20 min it wouldnt be able to pass through a needle. Whats happeneing is anti vax websites are feeding off each other. This was originally a bitchute video. The research was supposedly done by a lab that doesnt exist by the name of La Quinta Columna. For those that dont speak spanish it means the 5th column. And of course they are going to try to undermine anything the government would do.

Yeah, I understand it's pretty pointless bring actual facts to a conspiracy site.


a reply to: dragonridr

originally posted by: rickymouse
verification of toxicity is kind of hard because I do not know how to word it correctly.

I'd recommend PubMed and Google Scholar for any literature searching. Start with simple searches like "Graphene toxicity," and expand to more specific types of toxicity (cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, chronic/sub-chronic toxicity, sensitization, irritation, reproductive toxicity, hemocompatibility, pyrogenicity, toxicokinetic studies, immunotoxicology studies, and any others that you may have seen floating around).

originally posted by: nonspecific
You are entitled to think that but It certainly does not make you correct.

This is virtually always a true statement, but in this case, irrelevant.

I have personally found that most layperson opinions are based not on observable factors but on what they want to be the truth.

Then you have personally been spending way too much time with morons.

The pandemic is getting in the way of people's day to day lives and they don't like it so it's easier to deny or ignore it in the hope they can get back to normality.

Or, more and more people are are coming to realize there is no 'plandemic', only a plan/scam-demicpushed being pushed by liars and murderers.

Wearing a mask is a bit uncomfortable

Yes, and it is also very dangerous to the wearer, especially when worn long term.

so it's easier to use human rights or claim they don't work so as to feel justified by not wearing one.

Actually, no, it's much easier to use logic and reason, backed by what little science there actually is with regard to the wearing of masks.

Having an injection is unpleasant

And potentially lethal or having long term debilitating effects, especially when said injection is a brand new technology with ZERO long term safety studies and never before used en masse like it is being used now.

so it's far better to claim it's untested or not even a vaccene

It is untested (when it comes to long term safety trials all other vaccines must be subjected to.

or that covid is not even dangerous

It is far, far less dangerous than the doom-fear-porn-mongers would have everyone believe, basically like a bad flu.

originally posted by: nonspecific
Did Dr Malone invent Mnra vaccenes or not?

Objection: assumes facts not in evidence.

Or said another way - the answer to your question was in the post you responded to. Here, let me repeat it for you:

"He has never claimed to have invented these particular jabs. That is a fake-news talking point designed solely to attempt to discredit him.

He invented the technology used to create them.

The technology can have any number of essentially unlimited applications, these jabs being just one - or is it just one? Who knows, they could have 150 different versions identified by batch number, as an experiment to see which ones work better for whatever their purpose is.

The bottom line is, the only reason I am anti-vaxx at all, is the same reason I am against these non-vaxx jabs:

I do not trust those who are manufacturing them, or pushing them. At all. Ever. Period."

a reply to: tanstaafl

no he claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines its on his resume which he lied by the way. The only person that even used his research was his wife,

originally posted by: dragonridr
Its one companies mask from China.

The one we know about.

Sounds a lot like all of the recalled hand sanitizers that were mostly from China that were contaminated with methanol and other nasty crap.

originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: tanstaafl
no he claims to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines

Not what I read, even Yahoo News says he merely invented the tech.

its on his resume which he lied by the way. The only person that even used his research was his wife,

I honestly don't know for an absolute certainty, so you could be right. But, the onus is on you to prove it. Lets see if you can.

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
google
CRISPR Treatment Is Injected Directly Into a Patient's Body — a First for Gene Editing.Dec 3, 2020

(A) Cas9 can be delivered in the forms of DNA, mRNA, or protein. The protein format enables the immediate action of Cas9 when it is in the nucleus. The transduction of extracellular vesicles releases pre-loaded Cas9 RNPs into cells for efficient gene editing.May 30, 2020

Now, NIH-supported researchers have developed an alternative CRISPR delivery system: nanocapsules. Not only do these tiny, synthetic capsules appear to pose a lower risk of side effects, they can be precisely customized to deliver their gene-editing payloads to many different types of cells or tissues in the body, which can be extremely tough to do with a virus. Another advantage of these gene-editing nanocapsules is that they can be freeze-dried into a powder that’s easier than viral systems to transport, store, and administer at different doses.

At just 25 nanometers in diameter, each nanocapsule still has room to carry cargo. That cargo includes a single CRISPR/Cas9 scissor-like enzyme for snipping DNA and a guide RNA that directs it to the right spot in the genome for editing.

Based on their initial results, the researchers anticipate that their delivery system could reach most cells and tissues for virtually any gene-editing application. In fact, they are now exploring the potential of their nanocapsules for editing genes within brain tissue.

directorsblog.nih.gov...

A biodegradable nanocapsule delivers a Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex for in vivo genome editing

To improve the efficacy of the delivery nanomaterials capable of responding to magnetic fields are used. This approach is known as magnetofection and relies on using magnetic fields to guide the delivery of the nanovehicles [11]–[14]. Using magnetic nanomaterials has attracted significant attention for applications in biomedicine due to their ease of handling, their ability to transport various types of biomolecules, and the possibility of controlling their fate to specific tissues and organs[15]–[17]. Consequently, the chances for side effects can be significantly reduced [18], [19].

www.aiche.org... gnetite-vehicles-synthesis

Looks great on paper, looks great during computer modeling (bin there, dun that, lol), but what happens in real-life? Well, you're immune system kicks in, it sees the mRNA conversion waste as likely a virus. That creates antibodies and calls in T Killer cells to destroy the presumed errant cell which then starts creating micro blood clots that get progressively larger. As the process increases in speed, so does the amount of waste and the energy requirements of conversion. Generally this overloads the liver, causes renal failure in the kidneys and overloads the blood with waste causing sepsis. Shortly thereafter, the heart, lungs and brain fail though either sepsis or thrombosis (stroke, pulmonary embolism, cardiac event).

Fun tech! In order to make it viable, the immune system must have a dual operational mode so that it recognizes the original format and the new format as friend rather than foe. CRISPR, nano-lipids with mRNA or rDNA are viable as standalone functions, it's the immune system that has to be altered first or the process is successful, but the target patient dies.

Similar situation with the "jab" between capillary leakage and antigen specific antibodies. If you get injected close to an arterial capillary or actual artery, everything downstream will likely develop micro clots or full clots causing tissue death around the injection site in the muscle. If however the injection hits a vein, you're screwed. Downstream from your vein is your heart and after that your lungs and every organ in your body including your brain. That micro-clot caused by the immune response in you blood vessel walls is growing as the lipid nano-particles enter more cells that wall your blood vessels. At some point, those clots will end up in your heart (heart attack), lungs (pulmonary embolism), other organs (organ failure caused by thrombosis, like a stroke), your brain (stroke), etc.

Some people will be limited to small amounts of tissue death which is expected, maybe a little loss of strength in the arm housing the injection site. Some people will last a month or two and die. Some will die in 15 minutes to 48 hours. Some will develop organ and neurological problems via strokes, micro-strokes and myelin sheath destruction.

The gun has six bullets, there is only one blank (the placebo). Since I have done work in this area, I will not be getting the jab ;-)

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: Salander

They found that the jagged edges of graphene nanoparticles, super sharp and super strong, easily pierced through cell membranes in human lung, skin and immune cells, suggesting the potential to do serious damage in humans and other animals.

link


Imagine if they could manipulate vibrational frequencies to break up the graphine, like tiny razor blades coursing through your veins.

Debunk above because I know people close that have took the brand.

It's great you took the time to break up my opinion and address it in sections.

You have however just replied with what is essentially your own opinion and are assuming that you have countered my opinion with fact.

I'd suggest that if you want to feel victorious you should now back up all of your opinions with some nice links to all the evidence that shows you are correct.

I would say that as you are the one questioning the common narrative the onus to provide proof is on you to do so.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: nonspecific
You are entitled to think that but It certainly does not make you correct.

This is virtually always a true statement, but in this case, irrelevant.

I have personally found that most layperson opinions are based not on observable factors but on what they want to be the truth.

Then you have personally been spending way too much time with morons.

The pandemic is getting in the way of people's day to day lives and they don't like it so it's easier to deny or ignore it in the hope they can get back to normality.

Or, more and more people are are coming to realize there is no 'plandemic', only a plan/scam-demicpushed being pushed by liars and murderers.

Wearing a mask is a bit uncomfortable

Yes, and it is also very dangerous to the wearer, especially when worn long term.

so it's easier to use human rights or claim they don't work so as to feel justified by not wearing one.

Actually, no, it's much easier to use logic and reason, backed by what little science there actually is with regard to the wearing of masks.

Having an injection is unpleasant

And potentially lethal or having long term debilitating effects, especially when said injection is a brand new technology with ZERO long term safety studies and never before used en masse like it is being used now.

so it's far better to claim it's untested or not even a vaccene

It is untested (when it comes to long term safety trials all other vaccines must be subjected to.

or that covid is not even dangerous

It is far, far less dangerous than the doom-fear-porn-mongers would have everyone believe, basically like a bad flu.