Woman Goes Off After Seeing A Transgender Man Exposing Himself In Front Of Little Girls At A Spa

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Scrutinizing

The problem is when people like the man in question sue in establishments that would not otherwise allow this. Then if they win, the business must participate, and you and I are out of places where we cannot count on changing without strange men in our locker rooms.

Very true. There were the Christian bakers driven out of business, too. But it is also true we were never promised to not have to stand and fight the hard fight of good conscience, and I suppose, in the case of the spa people, it does come does to who is your God, then? Money? Are you, or are you not, unscrupulous? You'll sacrifice what you consider moral civilization for your profit? If so, let everything implode. As to we being out of spas, alright then. It's not as if it's the grocery store. A locker room isn't much to give up, for your Lord. I'd get out of that business, myself, if my business rules of decency, that have stood since the nation was born, until Creepy Joe, were not allowed, if it were between that and enjoining the slide into ever deepening moral degeneracy, hence becoming a participating perv platform. That's a no brainer.

Matthew 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

Matthew 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I do find it nauseating and am angered by it.Doesn't
anyone support children and their rights to a childhood?

a reply to: infolurker

When it went from homosexuals to an alphabet group that kept adding letters I knew then what road we were on.

Around 2011 I would comment on Utoob that eventually pedophilia would be normalized and mainstream and after that cannibalism, and then incest.

People would become irrate, teling me you can't group homosexuality and pedophilia together. I tried to explain anything that's not heterosexual is sexual perversion, and perversion is perversion no matter what the preferences are.

It does not mean all homosexuals are closet pedophiles. I know that, it is common sense.

However...I could use the logic the Left uses. If a white person wears a red MAGA hat they are automatically rayciss.

It's amazing how white people can be lumped together for the deeds of a few yet "all black people aren't...", "all gay people aren't...", "all democrats aren't...", "all leftists on ATS aren't..."....... But white and Right are held up to different standards.

It's also amazing how many groups gained louder voices and more rights than others under POTUS 44. They cry equality but it's anything but. And now with a child sniffer as POTUS 46, pedophilia WILL rear it's head and cry until it's pampered. Remember, "born this way" is the excuse THEY can and will use to normalize pedophilia. Get ready for the groundbreaking new TV series about a lovable pedophile that loves to funk children, and Good Morning America and the Today show will have "serious" discussions about pedophilia and how "psychologists" now say the love between a man and a child is a "special" bond that's been misunderstood all these years. Then whoever is head pedo at NAMBLA will be on and make Lady GaGa references because she helped fuel the "born this way" logic...

Watch.

Pretty creepy, although I lean left on some things..not here.. nope!

originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: DBCowboy

I do find it nauseating and am angered by it.Doesn't
anyone support children and their rights to a childhood?

Apparently not the left.

originally posted by: mamabeth

I do find it nauseating and am angered by it.Doesn't
anyone support children and their rights to a childhood?

How about the transmale that is seven who runs around a naked male locker room naked too. Maybe we need to just go unisex and the exploitation of children is just smart thinking and the norm like it was back in the Roman days...

originally posted by: vonclod
Pretty creepy, although I lean left on some things..not here.. nope!

a reply to: infolurker

Spas are going to have to be age restricted.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: mamabeth

I do find it nauseating and am angered by it.Doesn't
anyone support children and their rights to a childhood?

How about the transmale that is seven who runs around a naked male locker room naked too. Maybe we need to just go unisex and the exploitation of children is just smart thinking and the norm like it was back in the Roman days...

That's another one of my worries as the mother of a son.

When we have transmen who are otherwise women running around naked inside men's locker rooms, say teenage boys and the inevitable happens and those boys are destroyed for life, what then?

Since everyone was born naked, we might as well stay that way our entire lives.

With global warming kicking in, all the more reason to shed the threads.

a reply to: vonclod

Yeah this isn't about R or D, it's about common sense and respect for children.

People get mad when you say "slippery slope".

This......is a perfect example of what happens when you condone slippery slopes.

a reply to: ketsuko

Then the government will have to establish a nation-wide program to re-educate these "boys".

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: infolurker

This woman seems to be outraged by the sight of a penis. She says it over and over. Penis hanging out. Penis penis penis. At one point she asks so would it be all right for a woman to go into a mens spa with her breast hanging out? Well, there is a very simple answer to that one.

Sometimes I think the human race would be much better off it we were all nudists and got over these freekouts over seeing the other sexes junk.

You are outraged by all things Trump.

You create threads on him over and over.

Everyone has certain trigger points. We know what yours is. You'll excuse me if I understand why this woman seems outraged by the sight of a penis plainly displayed in sight of young girls. Being outraged by some random man exposing his genitals to young girls seems pretty legit to me.

Sexual reproduction, "the birds and the bees" etc are for MY FAMILY to explain to our children at our pace, and it won't involve the behaviors of a gender confused individual out in public.

I am a pretty liberal person as far as this stuff goes, but I draw the line at children. Maybe some people never had children or forgot what it was like to raise young children? I guess if this is what some consider "progress", count me out.

originally posted by: EdisonintheFM
a reply to: infolurker


Around 2011 I would comment on Utoob that eventually pedophilia would be normalized and mainstream and after that cannibalism, and then incest.

Pedophilia, cannibalism, incest

incest is the worst of the three?

Just a final after thought, if I may. We that know the USA and love what the USA is, at its heart, the Constitution, look on the Bill of Rights as almost scripture, this well and good. I think as important is our moral fiber, that peoples' families should not have to be subjected to moral degeneracy, the adults or their children to unwanted assaults from the likes of sexual perverts, just as a lady may not want the cosmetic counter to be in the middle of a department store brothel, some tranny sitting next to the perfumes, with his penis hanging out, or have her child see that. Example seems extreme? What's this thread about? We have erred greatly, to not have protected our moral fabric as well as our law. Actually, I have long voted with my pocketbook, boycotted certain businesses, crap Hollywood movies for years now, the list only longer, these days. I was always of the mind you want to offend me? You need not beg me not to take my money, then. We need to each do anything we can, and, in the best of all possible worlds, there aren't enough trannies for the spa to remain a going concern. You see what I mean? You do have power.

Well, I'll upset the apple cart. Ladies only spa???? Ladies only! That's sexist that is. If it was a men only establishment I'm sure there would be an LBGFDTCE ,or whatever they are, demonstration for equality.

Now to the op. Why not just have private changing rooms and if anyone walks about appropriately THEN ban them. Question:- Are women bothered about walking around naked in front of other women?

originally posted by: EdisonintheFM

When it went from homosexuals to an alphabet group that kept adding letters I knew then what road we were on.

Around 2011 I would comment on Utoob that eventually pedophilia would be normalized and mainstream and after that cannibalism, and then incest.

When we do something that at first is seen as good seems to always continue to evolve into some kind of corrupted manifestation not even close to the original event.

MKL evolved into some socialist based narrative that all Whites are racist and need to atone their whole lives while the words of MKL are no longer seen as good.
#metoo put focus on women being sexual mistreated and used to something were if a women doesn't like the date then the person gets DOX and Canx.
The understanding that Homosexuality is OK and should be seen as a norm too and biologically backed has turned into 57 genders...

Thing just keep turning, never stopping as it all spins out of control.

a reply to: Xtrozero

It goes back to the idea of "if you give an inch, we'll take a mile", and that's because you make an allowance for one group, then the next group over thinks, "Hey, we're not so far away from where that group is, so why not make a little more allowance for us?" And because you made an allowance for the first group, when the next group comes with their hat in hand begging, you start to wonder why you shouldn't just give a little for them too.

Once you start giving, it's hard to stop because you have to start figuring out for yourself why you should. You gave in for X, so why shouldn't you give in for Y?

This happens with social welfare programs too. There's always that next group that's bad off, but not quite as bad as the one you just helped. So you ask yourself why shouldn't they be helped?

And it's a never-ending round of where and why do you stop?

originally posted by: ketsuko

That's another one of my worries as the mother of a son.

When we have transmen who are otherwise women running around naked inside men's locker rooms, say teenage boys and the inevitable happens and those boys are destroyed for life, what then?

I wouldn't say "destroyed for life" as sex and nakedness is natural, but as a dad one of my biggest goals with my two boys growing up was to have them mature at a normal pace. I saw time and time again that 8 year-old much more mature in many ways then what they should be. I was very successful in that process but it wasn't easy. Today we are talking about throwing children into an adult world very quickly and we need to let kids be kids.

originally posted by: EdisonintheFM
a reply to: vonclod

Yeah this isn't about R or D, it's about common sense and respect for children.

People get mad when you say "slippery slope".

This......is a perfect example of what happens when you condone slippery slopes.

For sure!