Arrest Fauci: Highway sign hacked in Miami

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: chr0naut

I'm no expert in medical tests, so why does it matter what I think?

What is certain is that the PCR tests are fabulously unreliable with high rates of false positives.

What is certain is that those unreliable tests are the foundation of the Plandemic.

But they just aren't unreliable. They have a 99% specificity and sensitivity and only intentional gross misconduct can make the results unreliable.

a reply to: chr0naut

Pure propaganda sir. The PCR tests, as noted by Reiner Fuellmich and so many others including Portugese courts, are the very cornerstone of the Plandemic.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: chr0naut

Pure propaganda sir. The PCR tests, as noted by Reiner Fuellmich and so many others including Portugese courts, are the very cornerstone of the Plandemic.

Reiner Fullermich has no credential in organic chemistry and the Portugese court never made any decision on the effectiveness of PCR testing. Nor does a law court have any authority to question the function of physics and chemistry. The whole premise is absurd.

a reply to: chr0naut

What you don't understand is that I am in possession of common sense, AND I'm fairly perceptive. More, I know a scam when I see one. More, I've watched and read interviews with Kary Mullis who developed the test, and I took just enough chemistry in college to understand how the number of cycles run have a profound effect on results, especially on false positives.

The only people who still buy into the accuracy of the PCR tests are those who buy into claims by known liars.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: chr0naut

What you don't understand is that I am in possession of common sense, AND I'm fairly perceptive. More, I know a scam when I see one. More, I've watched and read interviews with Kary Mullis who developed the test, and I took just enough chemistry in college to understand how the number of cycles run have a profound effect on results, especially on false positives.

The only people who still buy into the accuracy of the PCR tests are those who buy into claims by known liars.

So, you are telling me that you only know chemistry to college level and 'just know' every science, medical, and authoritative government body are all lying to you?



An Overview of Cycle Threshold Values and their Role in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time PCR Test Interpretation - Public Health Ontario. (I picked Ontario Public Health because all the conspiracy theorists rail against the US authorities like the CDC, FDA, and etc. These are credentialed, can not possibly be earning something out of falsifying things, are authoritative, and are also credible). This is a document with an amplification plot right on the cover. It doesn't demonstrate crazy oscillation in results as amplification cycles increase. It clearly indicates that as amplification cycle increase, the likelihood of getting a different result than earlier cycles decreases. This means that false positives and false negative also diminish, but that higher cycle numbers are a waste of time, because they don't yield 'better' results. Over-amplification is a case of diminishing returns.

If you also think they are lying, you can verify it with a simple web search for "PCR amplification plot image". Then, when it finally sinks in, please revisit those ancient Kary Mullis videos, and watch them complete, asking yourself exactly what he is talking about (ignoring what someone has re-titled the video, because Kary Mullins passed away before COVID-19 was a thing, so he wasn't talking about that, nor was he talking about any modern PCR technique).

Additionally, Kary Mullis shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, with Michael Smith. He didn't operate in a vacuum and his 'discovery' of PCR is highly dependent on Michael Smith's work.

Mullis was also outspoken in his belief that the HIV virus did not cause AIDS. He also took lots of drugs and said he had an encounter with an extraterrestrial fluorescent raccoon. I bet they didn't mention any of that in the video's or commentaries you have seen. Read Kary Mullis's autobiography: Dancing Naked in the Mind Field.

a reply to: chr0naut

You know the old saying 'it takes a thief to catch a thief"?

Having participated in a number of scams myself as a young man, maybe it's easier for me to see the scam?

Why you cannot see the scam is not really mysterious. A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest.

Plandemic the movie explains the scam, but you might not be interested in having to sit through an examination of the facts.

Perhaps you think that career bureaucrats with vested interests play no role in this? I know better.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: chr0naut

You know the old saying 'it takes a thief to catch a thief"?

Having participated in a number of scams myself as a young man, maybe it's easier for me to see the scam?

Why you cannot see the scam is not really mysterious. A man sees what he wants to see and disregards the rest.

Plandemic the movie explains the scam, but you might not be interested in having to sit through an examination of the facts.

Perhaps you think that career bureaucrats with vested interests play no role in this? I know better.

Plandemic the movie is full of untruths, things that aren't even possible, and it implies a secret cooperation of literally tens of thousands, if not millions of people, many doing things no organized government can achieve or counter (despite the resources, populations, and funding of most governments), and these conspirators cannot gain any advantage by doing such evil things - they have no motive for doing so.

And I'm the gullible one?

LOL

a reply to: chr0naut

That is the same sort of 'argument' used to say that criticism of the Official Conspiracy Theory regarding 911 just cannot be.

It is most unpersuasive.

The 911 Narrative and the Covid Narrative have one thing in common--both are contradicted by known facts. Both require the temporary suspension of the laws of physics and the laws of medicine and science.

Plandemic the movie is so heavily censored and maligned because it simply presents the facts and the truth.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: chr0naut

That is the same sort of 'argument' used to say that criticism of the Official Conspiracy Theory regarding 911 just cannot be.

It is most unpersuasive.

The 911 Narrative and the Covid Narrative have one thing in common--both are contradicted by known facts. Both require the temporary suspension of the laws of physics and the laws of medicine and science.

Plandemic the movie is so heavily censored and maligned because it simply presents the facts and the truth.

What were the alleged wider political outcomes of the plandemic, or the alleged motives for 911 demolition of the trade center towers?

Do you see them in existence now? The zombified masses? The mass sterilizations, mass deaths and residual world population? The economic reset? The single world government? The end of Christianity? Did the CCP suddenly become the ruling government in the world? Is there any correlation between 5G telecoms towers and COVID-19 deaths?

Could they have just been doom-porn and conspiracy theories?

a reply to: chr0naut

The political outcomes of the Plandemic are obvious--economies have been turned upside down, science has been turned upside down, the US Treasury has been plundered and thus wealth redistributed. The masses have been terrorized and pharma has made huge profits by way of deception.

By comparison, the political outcomes of WTC attacks have been equally obvious. A perpetual state of war, magnificent profits for the Military Industrial Complex, numerous legislative assaults on the US Constitution, the birth of a brand new fat and cumbersome cabinet level bureaucracy, DHS and TSA, and so much more.