Shocking Results Came Back - Parents Sent Their Kids' Face Masks to A Lab for Analysis.

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
This basically proves masks, when used for hours at a time, are mini pathogen incubators. The heat and moisture help the infectious organisms we normally breath in small amounts to be fruitful and multiply. I am supprised this hasent developed some new diseases yet or it has and they just have not identified them yet. All those little face mounted biology labs everywhere.

Exactly, similar to an agar petri-dish.

It allows for a perfect environment for normally occurring pathogens to multiply to possibly unhealthy ppm. Our bodies immune systems can normally handle naturally occurring levels, however add masks in and now it's not a normal situation.

Then how does this all explain why the 2020-2021 flu season was practically non-existent? Certainly, we should all be sick as dogs for putting on these "petri dishes." But that apparently didn't happen. What's the most crazy explanation?

a reply to: Realtruth

The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. No viruses were detected on the masks, although the test is capable of detecting viruses. The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:

• Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)

• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)

• Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)

• Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)

• Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs— resistant to antibiotics) • Escherichia coli (food poisoning)

• Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)

• Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)

• Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease)

• Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)

• Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis) Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria.

Makes me wonder if these kids already have some of these diseases in their body already but because we have vaccines that actually work it doesn't affect them? Kind of like how the white man gave blankets to the first nations and killed them off with small pox - its been their the entire time, except the white man was immune to it.

I don't know a lot about this stuff so If I'm horribly wrong in my assumption, please correct me!

a reply to: Blue Shift

Then how does this all explain why the 2020-2021 flu season was practically non-existent?

Simple, you get sick, it is not the flu, you have covid. That is the only way for the flu to disappear the way it did.

a reply to: Realtruth

What’s the bet these parents are anti vaxxers.

A lot of those things found don’t come out of thin air, they have to be exposed to it in the first place.

How does a child in a first world country have tuberculosis?

There’s something not right here.

And don’t blame the masks, the mask didn’t give them tuberculosis.

originally posted by: Realtruth

Group of Parents Sent Their Kid's Face Mask in for Testing.

Parents got fed up, and did their own independent testing, and the results are alarming. I think many ATSer's already kind of knew that masks may not be all the professionals, and experts have been telling us, but this is an eye-opener.

We've been told for well over a year that widespread forced public masking should be implemented because, even if only moderately to slightly to negligibly effective at curbing the spread of COVID-19, there are ZERO drawbacks.

"What's the harm?" they ask.

"It's only a minor inconvenience," they bleat.

"If it saves ONE LIFE, it's worth it!" they implore.

Well, one group of Florida parents sent a batch of masks worn by their children to a lab to find out. And yeah, you'll probably need to make sure you aren't eating dinner anytime soon before you digest THESE results.

Here's what the results were:

Gainesville, FL (June 16, 2021) – A group of parents in Gainesville, FL, concerned about potential harms from masks, submitted six face masks to a lab for analysis.

The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. No viruses were detected on the masks, although the test is capable of detecting viruses. The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:

• Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)

• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)

• Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)

• Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)

• Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs— resistant to antibiotics) • Escherichia coli (food poisoning)

• Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)

• Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)

• Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires' disease)

• Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)

• Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis) Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria.

One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.

The face masks studied were new or freshly-laundered before wearing and had been worn for 5 to 8 hours, most during in-person schooling by children aged 6 through 11. One was worn by an adult. A t-shirt worn by one of the children at school and unworn masks were tested as controls.

No pathogens were found on the controls. Proteins found on the t-shirt, for example, are not pathogenic to humans and are commonly found in hair, skin, and soil.

I’m not sure why it is shocking or surprising to discover that masks that are designed to trap pathogens on their surfaces were found to actually trap pathogens on their surfaces after kids wore them for 5 to 8 hours.

What do people think is supposed to happen to the pathogens in the air when the air flows through the fabric?

a reply to: Chadwickus

Did anybody say the masks gave them TB? I must have missed it.

The point is that 1) the masks do not prevent the airborne transmission of virus and 2) they are facial Petri dishes in which all manner of pathogens can grow.

That has been said many times in many places during the last year, but the media and government have censored such statements.

Once again the conspiracy theorists have been proved correct.

a reply to: Realtruth

Acinetobacter Baumannii

Healthy people have a very low risk of getting an A. baumannii infection, according to the CDC.

The following factors increase the risk of infection:

Having a weakened immune system
Chronic lung disease
Diabetes
Lengthy hospital stays
Illnesses that require the use of a hospital ventilator
Having an open wound treated in the hospital
Treatments requiring invasive devices like urinary catheters
Acinetobacter bacteria are not airborne, but can be spread through direct contact with surfaces, objects, or the skin of people that are contaminated with A. baumannii.

www.everydayhealth.com...

We need more context. A healthy child with no pre-existing medical issues shouldn’t have this, would you agree?

a reply to: Salander

All that’s been proven is some nut jobs from Florida have exposed their children to some nasty diseases.

Maybe deliberately so people like you can go “oh we’re right derrrp”

Maybe you are right, but these results are highly suspicious and anyone with a true questioning mind would agree.

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Realtruth

What’s the bet these parents are anti vaxxers.

A lot of those things found don’t come out of thin air, they have to be exposed to it in the first place.

How does a child in a first world country have tuberculosis?

There’s something not right here.

And don’t blame the masks, the mask didn’t give them tuberculosis.

I will agree with you, in part. Whether they are vaxers or anti is not the point.

Our current MO is a very unhealthy lifestyle. Most foods are sanitized to the point where we do not get healthy pre-biotics and pro-biotics, thus compromising our immune systems.

I'll bet people didn't know that friendly bacterias, or probiotics produce hydrogen peroxide as a byproduct of breaking down starches and sugars in our intestine, but the production of H2O2 also kills foreign bacterias within us.

TB comes from comes from close encounters, and groups of people or approximately 1/4 of the earths population have latent TB, so it basically lies dormant.

Our bodies are meant to deal with these and many other pathogens, however in the past 100 years, even though we become more of an Aseptic society, it has it's disadvantages as well.

a reply to: Realtruth

Corynebacterium diphtheriae

In the United States and Europe, infections with toxigenic C. diphtheriae have become uncommon and cases are mostly imported from endemic areas.

…

Diphtheria was previously known as a childhood disease and owing to comprehensive routine vaccination programs, coverage is now mostly high in children within developed countries. In countries where vaccine coverage is low, circulation of toxigenic C. diphtheriae continues. In 2013, 4,680 diphtheria cases globally were reported to WHO (54), 80% of which occurred in just two countries – India and Indonesia.

www.antimicrobe.org...

Still think these results are accurate?

originally posted by: Realtruth

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
This basically proves masks, when used for hours at a time, are mini pathogen incubators. The heat and moisture help the infectious organisms we normally breath in small amounts to be fruitful and multiply. I am supprised this hasent developed some new diseases yet or it has and they just have not identified them yet. All those little face mounted biology labs everywhere.

Exactly, similar to an agar petri-dish.

It allows for a perfect environment for normally occurring pathogens to multiply to possibly unhealthy ppm. Our bodies immune systems can normally handle naturally occurring levels, however add masks in and now it's not a normal situation.

It’s not a “perfect” environment for pathogen growth. All those non-viral pathogens listed need more than just a warm moist environment to grow. They need a source of nutrients. When they are in your body, they scavenge your cells to provide those nutrients. That’s one of the reasons they can do damage to you when you are infected. When they are on an agar plate, it is the agar that provides those nutrients. Medical masks are made of polypropylene fibers, which is definitely not a nutrient.

a reply to: Chadwickus

During the last year of mask wearing, dentists have reported candida in the mouths of heavy wearers.

Going around with a filthy mask that is never changed by most will cause such problems. Whistleblowers have mentioned that for many long months. It makes sense, if you've ever changed air filters on machines.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Is that too complex for you to understand?

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Realtruth

originally posted by: beyondknowledge
This basically proves masks, when used for hours at a time, are mini pathogen incubators. The heat and moisture help the infectious organisms we normally breath in small amounts to be fruitful and multiply. I am supprised this hasent developed some new diseases yet or it has and they just have not identified them yet. All those little face mounted biology labs everywhere.

Exactly, similar to an agar petri-dish.

It allows for a perfect environment for normally occurring pathogens to multiply to possibly unhealthy ppm. Our bodies immune systems can normally handle naturally occurring levels, however add masks in and now it's not a normal situation.

It’s not a “perfect” environment for pathogen growth. All those non-viral pathogens listed need more than just a warm moist environment to grow. They need a source of nutrients. When they are in your body, they scavenge your cells to provide those nutrients. That’s one of the reasons they can do damage to you when you are infected. When they are on an agar plate, it is the agar that provides those nutrients. Medical masks are made of polypropylene fibers, which is definitely not a nutrient.

Only traces amounts of nutrient are needed for pathogens to live, in masks that most likely will come from saliva/amylase.

And petri dishes do not always contain nutrients, some are actually void depending on the research being done. I only gave petri-dishes as a laymen's example.

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: Chadwickus

During the last year of mask wearing, dentists have reported candida in the mouths of heavy wearers.

Going around with a filthy mask that is never changed by most will cause such problems. Whistleblowers have mentioned that for many long months. It makes sense, if you've ever changed air filters on machines.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Is that too complex for you to understand?

The masks “tested” weren’t filthy though, at least according to the article.

If someone is wearing the same mask day in day out and not sanitising it properly, of course there’s going to be issues.

I mean, most of us know not to use a hair dryer in a bath, but somehow, people still do.

a reply to: Chadwickus

It does exist in America, though rare. So what evidence do you have the results are not real?

a reply to: Realtruth
So I guess this means those kids have been in some pretty nasty surroundings.

It isn't like all those pathogens just popped into existence because of the masks.