It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We know that because, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most of the people who were in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But, strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven't been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls these people "unindicted co-conspirators." What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they're FBI operatives.
For example, one of those "unindicted co-conspirators" is someone the government identifies only as "Person Two." According to those documents, "Person Two" stayed in the same hotel room as an "insurrectionist" named Thomas Caldwell, who's alleged to be a member of the group called the Oath Keepers. "Person Two" also "stormed the barricades" at the Capitol on January 6, alongside Thomas Caldwell.
The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell -- who by the way is a 65-year-old man -- was led to believe there would be a "quick reaction force" also participating in January 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person Three" -- who had a hotel room and an accomplice.
originally posted by: network dude
www.foxnews.com...
We know that because, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most of the people who were in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But, strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven't been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls these people "unindicted co-conspirators." What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they're FBI operatives.
For example, one of those "unindicted co-conspirators" is someone the government identifies only as "Person Two." According to those documents, "Person Two" stayed in the same hotel room as an "insurrectionist" named Thomas Caldwell, who's alleged to be a member of the group called the Oath Keepers. "Person Two" also "stormed the barricades" at the Capitol on January 6, alongside Thomas Caldwell.
The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell -- who by the way is a 65-year-old man -- was led to believe there would be a "quick reaction force" also participating in January 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person Three" -- who had a hotel room and an accomplice.
Opps, I don't think this part was supposed to come out. At least it's good to know we had professionals helping drive the narrative.
It does help answer that nagging question I have had. "Why did a group of people who were totally against violence, and totally for the police suddenly attack them?
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: bigsnowman
trust me.
as far as I could throw you.
originally posted by: network dude
www.foxnews.com...
We know that because, without fail, the government has thrown the book at most of the people who were in the Capitol on January 6. There was a nationwide dragnet to find them. Many of them are still in solitary confinement tonight. But, strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven't been charged. Look at the documents. The government calls these people "unindicted co-conspirators." What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they're FBI operatives.
For example, one of those "unindicted co-conspirators" is someone the government identifies only as "Person Two." According to those documents, "Person Two" stayed in the same hotel room as an "insurrectionist" named Thomas Caldwell, who's alleged to be a member of the group called the Oath Keepers. "Person Two" also "stormed the barricades" at the Capitol on January 6, alongside Thomas Caldwell.
The government's indictments further indicate that Caldwell -- who by the way is a 65-year-old man -- was led to believe there would be a "quick reaction force" also participating in January 6. That quick reaction force, Caldwell was told, would be led by someone called "Person Three" -- who had a hotel room and an accomplice.
Opps, I don't think this part was supposed to come out. At least it's good to know we had professionals helping drive the narrative.
It does help answer that nagging question I have had. "Why did a group of people who were totally against violence, and totally for the police suddenly attack them?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: network dude
"Unindicted co-conspirator" can also mean "cooperating witness". You need to ask yourself what's more probable, that they're all FBI operatives or are they people narc'ing on their buddies so they don't go to prison.
originally posted by: network dude
I suppose it would be best to ask, but then what answer would you expect?
originally posted by: Shaiker
When BLM are glorified for burning down your business, while protestors at the source of the many woes in our country are called insurgents and hunted down placing themselves above all other citizens of our nation.
When anyone questions their narratives such as the capitol riots, blm protest, election fraud, vax, epstein, 9/11, Iraq war, transgender, education among many more that could be listed they are demonized as conspiracy theorist or supporters of the bad man.
If you are one to believe the narrative without question, just remember the narrative still needs more folks to blame for whatever woes they can think up to cause division and some day soon you too may be "part of the problem" rather than a blind supporter.
The great purge of 2020/2021 has targeted the elders , I ask where were sick and dying sent in New York and other emerging cases in other states. Now they have forgotten the narrative of muslims bad and began targeting Whites and any one that sympathizes with them on any of the questioning above.
If the masses are divided their power grows and the waters continue to be murky and they will reiterate. At some point these folks will turn on the poor to raise the middle.
Maybe not in the near future, but at some point many of you "yes citizens" will become the target as the strategy of division continues.
originally posted by: Nunyabizisit
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: bigsnowman
trust me.
as far as I could throw you.
Melting might be more efficient.