posted on Jun, 12 2021 @ 03:42 PM
Something to consider if you want to go into modeling or entertainment/acting/ tattoos on nice skin of the actors is rejected by the
producers/directors because of the legal ramifications. Tattoos are technically the art/property of the artist and it's a hassle to get a release
form signed. Also the H/mu, hair and make up people on set are to busy to cover up the ink. Unless you are an already established "talent"
consider your career path and what's most important... Easily hidden ink by clothes is a different story. Even on my indy productions, visible ink
is an instant rejection for someone wanting to be in front of the camera even if I love your audidion... Some talent agents will pay for laser
removal if you are a good actor for a particular production. I know there are exceptions to the rule...this is just what my agent told me back in
2000 just after I got taft-hartled into SAG.
On the other hand, crew people behind the camera, grips, gaffers, ACs, AD, scripties, PAs, Boom ops, sound rec. are covered in ink, body
modification, etc..
www.mondaq.com...
I know, the new ATS hates the media in all its ramifications, even though ATS is considered a social media forum.nvm....
edit on 12-6-2021 by
olaru12 because: (no reason given)