It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BTW, nice graphic... but if you wear short pants, they don't do much to protect you... and if you wear them on your head they do nothing to protect anyone (in either case, as the pee-er or the pee-ee). Maybe just tell people it's a good idea to wear proper pants properly and show them how instead of just saying "Everyone has to wear pants or else!"
originally posted by: Rob808
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Rob808
The idea behind peer review is sound, but only so long as the peers are reviewing the process objectively, not subjectively. When everyone knows the desired outcome and will ignore the flaws in the process in order to reach it, peer review breaks down.
I wasn’t discussing peer review here, simply noting that folks look to their peers for social cues, which of late is simply parroting SCIENCE without actually following any research. As I already stated, folks are confusing position and rank as the holder of science because it’s reinforced to let others think for you.