Conservatives the new rebels?

originally posted by: Mandroid7
There is absolutely no direct view of any strikes.

Yeah, they were probably pulling the blows like it was the WWE which those morons most likely watch when not QLARP'ing. Both are just as real.

May want to give their defense attorney a heads up to use this tactic to keep them out of the federal prison they're going to.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

So another non answer...nice

Try contributing something

Lame

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude

It's a sad reality that people who swore an oath to the Constitution would be considered rebellious.

Rebellious to who, should be the question asked.

Who will ask it? And will asking get you put in jail?
we are living in interesting times.

a reply to: The2Billies

The idea that being a conservative and believing most people are basically good is a rebellious and now politically unacceptable and inflammatory idea.

To the Republican Party that is an unacceptable and inflammatory idea.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
So another non answer..

A non-answer? It was an answer, you just don't like the fact that those clowns got charged. Must have been for not hitting the guy and only because they like Trumpy Bear.

The Department of Justice is charging an Arkansas man accused of repeatedly beating a police officer with an American flag during the riot at the U.S. Capitol. Learn about what the reeeeeeetard did here

a reply to: wheresthebody


Sonofabitch! I knew it!


These Canadians are an interesting bunch.


Someone should probably keep tabs on them.


Yknow, just in case they strike again.


You'll be surprised who's a Canadian and who isn't!


Richard Simmons. Not a Canadian.
How do you explain that???

I say we don't trust them.

We should blame them!

Blame Canada!

Conservatives are the hand-maidens of socialists.

By its very nature, conservatism can only slow the progression of big government and socialism rather than arrest it. This is because it fails to offer an alternative direction to which we are now moving. We might not have the welfare state if conservatives hadn't first implemented it in Imperial Germany. Recently the conservative party in the UK implemented vast state powers to restrict the liberties of its citizens, intervene in the economy, and penalize those who disobeyed. Conservatives are also willing to use the government to enforce the policies that may hinder the progression of socialism, but at the same time increasing state power.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Looks like you like playing games.
Let's see if you have the tact to answer two direct questions.


Why was an actress rubbing an onion on her eyes and claiming she was tear gassed?

Why were the police waving "the rioters" into the building?


..oh did you log off?
Lol
Surprise, surprise

originally posted by: Mandroid7
Why was an actress rubbing an onion on her eyes and claiming she was tear gassed?

Why were the police waving "the rioters" into the building?

Who cares? Not relevant to the fact that you claimed there was no riot.

a reply to: DBCowboy

It's a sad reality that people who swore an oath to the Constitution would be considered rebellious.

Yes. A sad reality. So real that it became enshrined into the U.S. Constitution with the 14th Amendment.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

a reply to: 19Bones79

It's not even a real country anyways

a reply to: wheresthebody


Always refreshing to see a fellow academic speak truth to power.


Nobody's that polite!

What are they playing at? Who are they even?

a reply to: underwerks

Sorry you are wrong.

The Republican Party
1. believes that the vast majority of US citizens are good people
2. the vast majority of US citizens are not racist/sexist etc
3. that Martin Luther King Jr. preached and taught the kind of anti-racism that we all should follow. Ask Tim Scott, Marco Rubio, Caitlin Jenner.
4. the nation was founded by flawed individuals as we all are, but the constitution is basically a good document with the idea of freedom and liberty for all people equally behind it

It is Democrats who believe:
1.the vast majority US citizens are racists, sexists, people who cling to their Bibles, ask Hillary or Obama or Biden
many liberals say most US citizens are just not very good people who need to be reeducated into politically correct thinking and speaking
2.the nation was founded in evil by evil people, what liberals and Democrats teach children in schools about the founding of the US, it was based in slavery by slavers and therefore the constitution written by them is entirely evil with evil intentions, making the US a fundamentally systemically evil nation filled with systemically, inherently and inborn( if one has low melanin levels) evil people
3.the constitution is a negative document that tells government what it can not do and needs to be changed to remove restrictions on what the government can do to the people, ask Obama, he said this several times
4. the Chinese government is the model by which Obama said he would like for the US Presidency, look it up

Show me one recent prominent and influential Democrat who has:
praised the vast majority of US citizens as good, honorable, and wanting the best for others
said the US is basically a good nation that has tried its best to get better and more fair and equal through the years
said the flag is a symbol of freedom that Americans should be proud of
You won't be able to because Democrats disdain the nation as a whole, its people and see US citizens as a bunch of pathetic, racists, sexists and evil capitalists

a reply to: 19Bones79

Canada is a constitutional Commonwealth realm. I noticed the image of Queen Elizabeth on their currency last time I was in Canada.

a reply to: pthena

So it's a front company.


The more you know...


And to think it all started out with a handful of igloos..

I mean in the civilized world we put ice in our drinks hallo nobody would ever use it as a brick that's soo impractical especially during the summer months.


We should study them and observe their habits.
It's a modern day Galapagos island.

a reply to: The2Billies

No you’re not.

If you’ve chosen a side and think there’s a good and a bad one then you’re part of the problem.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: wheresthebody


Sonofabitch! I knew it!


These Canadians are an interesting bunch.


Someone should probably keep tabs on them.


Yknow, just in case they strike again.


You'll be surprised who's a Canadian and who isn't!


Richard Simmons. Not a Canadian.
How do you explain that???

I say we don't trust them.

We should blame them!

Blame Canada!

I apologize.

We did it.

Did I apologize?

Sorry.

a reply to: 19Bones79

Within the context of conservativeness and rebelness
The U.S. has a sort of representative democracy. So does Canada and so does the UK.

As explained by my Boer-Canadian 5th grade teacher, and filtered through a faulty memory, the American Revolution went like this:

There were 14 colonies in North America. Thirteen of them wanted to break off from the British crown. They sent some delegates to Quebec, the 14th colony and said, "Hey, we're going to be rebels, come join us."

The Quebec people replied, "No way, we are not a bunch of rebels."

Then later, the New U.S. people decided to steal land from the Canadians, and that's how the war of 1812 started. Since Canada was a good subject, the British came and burned the U.S. capital. So the Brits won the war because Canadian land wasn't stolen, which was the U.S. objective.

=========
Why did I specify Boer-Canadian?

Years and years later, I saw a movie, The Little Kidnappers (1990_film)

Coralee Elliott Testar's version of the story revolves around letters written by James' son to his wife and children. Harry and Davy have brought them in a box James had carved for his son many years before. Through these letters, James begins to find healing from his grief over the death of his son at the hands of Dutch soldiers in the Second Boer War in South Africa, deliverance from the hatred in his heart for neighboring Dutch farmers, and acceptance of his daughter's love for the village doctor who is also of Dutch heritage.

The movie's title refers to the discovery and rescue by Harry and Davy of the neighbor's baby briefly left unattended on a beach and their decision to hide and care for it themselves rather than risk their grandfather's harsh and unmerciful reaction to it.

What it means to be a Commonwealth is that if the British decide to go to war with somebody over something that Canada doesn't care about, then Canada is also called on to supply its military.

a reply to: pthena

I always appreciate a history lesson





But I digress.
Why do we have a Japan forum but not a Canadian one?

We could even have a Canadian mudpit called:

'No sir! In fact, I am not sorry. You appear to be mistaken.'



New owners, take note.

a reply to: 19Bones79

The Japan forum is dedicated to the discussion of the Fukushima Nuclear Reactor Disaster started in 2011.

Start looking for a big Canadian disaster.