Conservatives the new rebels?

a reply to: The2Billies

True.
What's scarier is the fbi starting the "right wing terrorism will be a problem!"
Advertisement campaign before all of this clearly planned stuff went down.
Our gov looks like the terrorists.
It's pretty disheartening honestly.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the constitution of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same.

I won't apologize for it, and won't be changing my mind. Our nation has an amazing policy of allowing the asstards the ability to go somewhere else if they choose to. Pack your bags bitches, Venezuela is calling.

a reply to: The2Billies

I think that's how the Republicans would like to be seen but it isn't a rebellious stance.

Personally I think this is more accurate...

originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: The2Billies

True.
What's scarier is the fbi starting the "right wing terrorism will be a problem!"
Advertisement campaign before all of this clearly planned stuff went down.
Our gov looks like the terrorists.
It's pretty disheartening honestly.

Yep, government employees were told by the Biden administration to start reporting to HR all their friends and relatives who are conservative and just might be a right winger.

This is true but I can't tell you how I know or I put real people at real risk, just quietly ask any federal employee you know.

One person did report his brother as believing in conservative ideas, even though he thought his brother wasn't a "terrorist" at all, in any way shape or form, but he was worried about losing his job because his brother was vocal about conservatism on his social media.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Mandroid7
There was no riot. You are uninformed or lying..as usual

That cop must have been whacking himself in the head on the bottom video. Neat trick how he got the bearded cretin to whack him with a flag while laying on the ground.

which half of the country did that gentleman represent? North, or south? Or was he just there representing his state? We couldn't fit all the 75 million into the roped areas, so we sent a few hundred representatives. But I assure you they speak for everyone, just as the Bernie Bro did when he popped a cap in Steve.

And we asked them to come armed, but all they could find was a flag pole. That guy must have been from Jersey. (strict gun laws there)

originally posted by: network dude
which half of the country did that gentleman represent? North, or south? Or was he just there representing his state? We couldn't fit all the 75 million into the roped areas, so we sent a few hundred representatives. But I assure you they speak for everyone, just as the Bernie Bro did when he popped a cap in Steve.

And we asked them to come armed, but all they could find was a flag pole. That guy must have been from Jersey. (strict gun laws there)

Er, what? Did you just infer all of that from correcting the other poster that there was in fact rioting that day?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: network dude
which half of the country did that gentleman represent? North, or south? Or was he just there representing his state? We couldn't fit all the 75 million into the roped areas, so we sent a few hundred representatives. But I assure you they speak for everyone, just as the Bernie Bro did when he popped a cap in Steve.

And we asked them to come armed, but all they could find was a flag pole. That guy must have been from Jersey. (strict gun laws there)

Er, what? Did you just infer all of that from correcting the other poster that there was in fact rioting that day?

Er, what? Are you still trolling?

a reply to: TrulyColorBlind

Are you? My comment to the poster in question was about him claiming there was not rioting on January, 6th. There was, not really open to interpretation.

a reply to: network dude

... so we sent ... we asked them to come armed ...

You are aware that you have the right to remain silent aren't you?

Liberals Raged Against the Machine just long enough to become a more rigid, oppressive, totalitarian Machine.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

there was a riot, but if you concentrate super hard, you find that there were a few hundred folks being douchebags, and swinging at cops. (which is 180 degrees away from the movement they were supposed to be totally invested in) and there is a better than average chance they didn't represent the entire republican party. Which is the narrative that dick faces seem to be pushing. I feel it's important to make sure that particular aspect is crystal clear.

Most of us didn't beat up on cops, and even better, most of us weren't there that day.

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: network dude

... so we sent ... we asked them to come armed ...

You are aware that you have the right to remain silent aren't you?

Sure, I fully admit to using MKUltra type communication to channel a select few protesters into being violent, while leaving the majority of them bewildered and lost. it's a gift I learned.

originally posted by: network dude
there was a riot, but if you concentrate super hard, you find that there were a few hundred folks being douchebags, and swinging at cops.

I don't recall attributing the rioting behavior that day to anyone but the QLARP'ing rioters. Feel free to correct me though.

Most of us didn't beat up on cops, and even better, most of us weren't there that day.

Again, I'm not the person making those implications.

a reply to: The2Billies

My Northern roots fought against the British Crown. They were rebels.

My Southern roots came later. They prided themselves as English. But they sided with breaking the Union. They were rebels.

My roots are rebel through and through.
I am an ethnic rebel.
If you don't agree with that, then you are racist.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I'm just making sure that it's super crystal clear when folks stop by and read things. Believe it or not, some idiots really do want to make it look like the riot on the 6th is the fault of all those not on the left.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Yeah that looks pretty serious bud. Lmao
Get out of here.
Maybe you should go cry with an onion about it?

onion crying

originally posted by: network dude
I'm just making sure that it's super crystal clear when folks stop by and read things.

I'm pretty good about parsing my words as I'm sure you've seen over the past 15 years here.

originally posted by: Mandroid7
Yeah that looks pretty serious bud.

Yeah, I agree, that's what rioting looks like. I'm sure that bearded asswipe is going to enjoy a federal penitentiary unless you decide to take up his case and use the 'there was no riot there on the 6th' defense or as it's known legally, the 'la-la-la-la defense'. Should work based on your inability to grasp the reality of the events.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

There is absolutely no direct view of any strikes.
Nice try though.
Care to comment on the actress claiming she was tear gassed while rubbing a onion on her eyes? The cops leading everyone in?

Yeah, didn't think so. Typical deflection from you.

a reply to: network dude

It's a sad reality that people who swore an oath to the Constitution would be considered rebellious.

Rebellious to who, should be the question asked.