It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fauci Emails Published

page: 16
81
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 12:57 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Am aware of CRISPR.

And several newer experimental technologies that can't be discussed here.

Lack of previously known markers does not = evidence that virus is not man made when we are still unaware of which technologies were available in wuhan bsl4.

CCP could have easily cleared that up on day 1, or any day since, but have chosen not to do that.



Have not seen anyone claim that covid was a completed bio weapon.

Have seen many that suspect it was CCP beginning to learn how to create one.

So complete red herring.



Of course it also means reverse.

But it was YOU who made the inaccurate claim here, not me.



Documents seem to indicate that GoF was pretty well known in fauxxi circles.

Not necessarily for bio warfare, but still GoF, and specifically on SARS like coronaviruses.

I did not say 'proof', that is your lame tactic to avoid admitting being inaccurate.

I said 'evidence'. Pretty big difference.




How deceptive of you.

Most serious lab leaks in past 20 years have been in CCP.

CCP had no modern labs before that.



Detailed reports of Ft Detrick incident are publicly available.

You might want to read those reports before comparing that incident in ANY way to what many suspect happened in wuhan.

I don't know enough about non ccp foreign incidents to comment on those.

Perhaps someone else will.

But whatever happened there doesn't in any way change the fact that CCP appears to have been in coverup overdrive since well before the whistleblower let the world know of covid's existence, and still to this day.


Any more absurd claims to make?



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 02:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

This is a false statement?



Despite the numerous and desperate investigations into the origins of covid-19, there is no conclusive evidence it came from any aspect of nature.





NEWS EXPLAINER
08 June 2021
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don’t know
Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.

www.nature.com...

There’s not yet any substantial evidence for a lab leak. Why are scientists still considering it?
Scientists don’t have enough evidence about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 to rule out the lab-leak hypothesis, or to prove the alternative — that the virus has a natural origin.




Seems like you wouldn’t know the truth if it was cited and quoted to you.

Dude has been and will continue to be a spokesman for the chinese.
He cares not about the truth.
There is a loooong post history that demonstrates such.
It is why he is defending china in this thread.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 02:07 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Perhaps you could enter a thread with something on-topic, rather than empty insults?

It is not an insult.
Simply the truth.
Sadly you have been defending the Chinese for quite some time.
Not suprisingly your chosen home nation is doing the same.
Just own it.

The chinese cooked this up in their lab, leaked it upon the world.
They will get theirs.
As will their defenders.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 03:39 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Still no conclusive evidence that it didn’t come from a lab either.


Either way. China, Fauci, Peter Dazsak, WHO have acted unethically. And not with transparency.




US researcher with ties to Wuhan lab personally thanked Fauci in April 2020 for dispelling lab leak theory ‘myths’

www.carolinacoastonline.com...


Daszak played a key role at the onset of the pandemic in suppressing debate about the possibility that the Wuhan Institute of Virology could be connected to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Daszak orchestrated a statement published in The Lancet medical journal in February 2020 prior to any serious research on the origins of COVID-19 condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggest the virus doesn’t have a natural origin. Daszak later admitted through a spokesman that he organized the statement to protect Chinese scientists from online criticism.

Daszak was also the only U.S. citizen allowed to participate in the World Health Organization’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19 in China in January and February. The WHO did not even ask to see deleted Wuhan Institute of Virology databases containing information on at least 16,000 virus samples it had studied prior to the pandemic because Daszak said he personally vouched for the lab.

Daszak then said U.S. intelligence on the Wuhan Institute of Virology shouldn’t be trusted after he and his WHO colleagues concluded it was highly unlikely COVID-19 leaked from the lab.





WHO inspector has conflict of interest in Wuhan COVID probe: Prominent biologist
Richard Ebright says Peter Daszak has conflict of interest in WHO and Lancet investigations of Wuhan outbreak

www.taiwannews.com.tw...

edit on 15-6-2021 by neutronflux because: Added source



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

This is a false statement?



Despite the numerous and desperate investigations into the origins of covid-19, there is no conclusive evidence it came from any aspect of nature.





NEWS EXPLAINER
08 June 2021
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don’t know
Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.

www.nature.com...

There’s not yet any substantial evidence for a lab leak. Why are scientists still considering it?
Scientists don’t have enough evidence about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 to rule out the lab-leak hypothesis, or to prove the alternative — that the virus has a natural origin.




Seems like you wouldn’t know the truth if it was cited and quoted to you.

Dude has been and will continue to be a spokesman for the chinese.
He cares not about the truth.
There is a loooong post history that demonstrates such.
It is why he is defending china in this thread.


I have made no pro-Chinese comments in any post in this topic thread to which I have so far written numerous posts.

In this topic thread, you have made more mention of the country than I have.

edit on 15/6/2021 by chr0naut because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

This is a false statement?



Despite the numerous and desperate investigations into the origins of covid-19, there is no conclusive evidence it came from any aspect of nature.





NEWS EXPLAINER
08 June 2021
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don’t know
Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.

www.nature.com...

There’s not yet any substantial evidence for a lab leak. Why are scientists still considering it?
Scientists don’t have enough evidence about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 to rule out the lab-leak hypothesis, or to prove the alternative — that the virus has a natural origin.




Seems like you wouldn’t know the truth if it was cited and quoted to you.

Dude has been and will continue to be a spokesman for the chinese.
He cares not about the truth.
There is a loooong post history that demonstrates such.
It is why he is defending china in this thread.


I have made no pro-Chinese comments in any post in this topic thread to which I have so far written numerous posts.

In this topic thread, you have made more mention of the country than I have.



So we should just forget everything you said on MANY other threads?

And yes, we understand why you would try to keep CCP out of this particular conversation.

Isn't working out very well, is it?



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

Still no conclusive evidence that it didn’t come from a lab either.


Either way. China, Fauci, Peter Dazsak, WHO have acted unethically. And not with transparency.




US researcher with ties to Wuhan lab personally thanked Fauci in April 2020 for dispelling lab leak theory ‘myths’

www.carolinacoastonline.com...


Daszak played a key role at the onset of the pandemic in suppressing debate about the possibility that the Wuhan Institute of Virology could be connected to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Daszak orchestrated a statement published in The Lancet medical journal in February 2020 prior to any serious research on the origins of COVID-19 condemning “conspiracy theories” that suggest the virus doesn’t have a natural origin. Daszak later admitted through a spokesman that he organized the statement to protect Chinese scientists from online criticism.

Daszak was also the only U.S. citizen allowed to participate in the World Health Organization’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19 in China in January and February. The WHO did not even ask to see deleted Wuhan Institute of Virology databases containing information on at least 16,000 virus samples it had studied prior to the pandemic because Daszak said he personally vouched for the lab.

Daszak then said U.S. intelligence on the Wuhan Institute of Virology shouldn’t be trusted after he and his WHO colleagues concluded it was highly unlikely COVID-19 leaked from the lab.





WHO inspector has conflict of interest in Wuhan COVID probe: Prominent biologist
Richard Ebright says Peter Daszak has conflict of interest in WHO and Lancet investigations of Wuhan outbreak

www.taiwannews.com.tw...



Then we just need patience, to wait for that unequivocal evidence to come to light, especially as there are redoubled efforts into finding the answers.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:21 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

And yet you ignore the unethical behavior. And if China would have been fully open, transparent, and fully opened up the lab, the investigation into covid would be father along.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

And yet you ignore the unethical behavior. And if China would have been fully open, transparent, and fully opened up the lab, the investigation into covid would be father along.



And a lot more humans would still be alive.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:35 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

Blaming someone for something they didn't do, just so you can believe your particular doom porn, is not ethical.

More lies from the chinese cheerleader.
Go big red!!!



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: Nunyabizisit

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

This is a false statement?



Despite the numerous and desperate investigations into the origins of covid-19, there is no conclusive evidence it came from any aspect of nature.





NEWS EXPLAINER
08 June 2021
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don’t know
Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.

www.nature.com...

There’s not yet any substantial evidence for a lab leak. Why are scientists still considering it?
Scientists don’t have enough evidence about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 to rule out the lab-leak hypothesis, or to prove the alternative — that the virus has a natural origin.




Seems like you wouldn’t know the truth if it was cited and quoted to you.

Dude has been and will continue to be a spokesman for the chinese.
He cares not about the truth.
There is a loooong post history that demonstrates such.
It is why he is defending china in this thread.


I have made no pro-Chinese comments in any post in this topic thread to which I have so far written numerous posts.

In this topic thread, you have made more mention of the country than I have.



So we should just forget everything you said on MANY other threads?

And yes, we understand why you would try to keep CCP out of this particular conversation.

Isn't working out very well, is it?


I haven't been particularly pro-Chinese, even in other threads.

But I often get accused of being on China's 'side', somehow, perhaps because I suggest the illogic of believing in their favorite doom-porn, and they have not got the capability to debate a topic, so they wheel out some old stereotypical insult they have heard someone else use.

Hell, just look at this topic thread, I have not said a single good word for China, yet look at the number of those who have made their only contributions to this thread, that I have done the opposite.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:42 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut



Additionally, the earliest cases of the disease, patient zero candidates, were not associated with the Wuhan Lab, or of the seafood market there, or its produce.

Total baldfaced china loving lie.
Pulled straight from his keister.

Go big red!!!


Even the Chinese won't attempt that level of bs.
www.bbc.com...


Chinese authorities originally reported that the first coronavirus case was on 31 December and many of the first cases of the pneumonia-like infection were immediately connected to a seafood and animal market in Wuhan, in the Hubei province.





edit on 15/6/2021 by shooterbrody because: China cheerleader lies



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 05:48 AM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut


Even IF true that you haven't discussed CCP.

THIS time.


You certainly don't seem too interested in discussing the fauxxi emails.

Some of which indicate that fauxxi's team has always believed that source was wuhan bsl4, and source was coronavirus GoF based on evidence available to them a long time ago.

You also NEVER seem to want to discuss CCP Tiananmen Square Massacre.

Why is that?



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 06:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: chr0naut

This is a false statement?



Despite the numerous and desperate investigations into the origins of covid-19, there is no conclusive evidence it came from any aspect of nature.





NEWS EXPLAINER
08 June 2021
The COVID lab-leak hypothesis: what scientists do and don’t know
Nature examines arguments that the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a lab in China, and the science behind them.

www.nature.com...

There’s not yet any substantial evidence for a lab leak. Why are scientists still considering it?
Scientists don’t have enough evidence about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 to rule out the lab-leak hypothesis, or to prove the alternative — that the virus has a natural origin.




Seems like you wouldn’t know the truth if it was cited and quoted to you.

Dude has been and will continue to be a spokesman for the chinese.
He cares not about the truth.
There is a loooong post history that demonstrates such.
It is why he is defending china in this thread.


And extreme anti American rhetoric at every opportunity

Muslim-killing, ultra-oppressive, authoritarian warmongering communist country : good

Orange Man: Bad.



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 06:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
Human viruses: discovery and emergence

Sorry to stomp all over your vast understanding of "Gee whiz" science online articles.

From tfa:

"There are 219 virus species that are known to be able to infect humans."

So - how many different genus - or strains - of each species are there?.

For anyone else, it has to do with the meanings of words - 'species', 'genus', 'strain' and 'virus particles' - all words with specific, but different, meanings - something that naut tries to leverage in order to support their religion (blind worship of state/science).



posted on Jun, 15 2021 @ 07:15 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



new topics

top topics



 
81
<< 13  14  15   >>

log in

join