It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlackArrow
a reply to: ColonelSF
Gates left the country under TRUMP, and pulled all of his funding out of everything American. Gave it ALL to the chinese, he is very much in bed with the chinese. This becomes obvious when you learn who owns the companies involved..
Simply because they do not stop him from mass testing on their people. If you click my Corona Heist and scroll down, you will find the genocides that have taken place in china. There's also paystubs to WHO, and many other fun tidbits included in that document. Or you can just check the wiki, but the point of the document was to have everything together with 'community approved' resources.. Those that trust certain media's, etc will find all links approved..
I still need to add a bunch more info, but honestly I haven't been motivated to do so, not because don't have the info.. I definitely do, just.. no one believes you anyway, so what is the point? Despite the evidence and paper trails to everything..
He only recently came back after BIDEN won the election. "I am so eager and excited to work with the Biden Administration" - Bill Gates.
Bill gates teams up with Biden
More working with BIDEN
Telling Biden What to do
vaccine formulas shouldn’t be shared with developing world for their 'safety'
The FDA banned Bill Gates ID program under Trump, so when he realized he couldn't continue testing on Americans, he went over to china. As simple as that.
His ID program was very complex in detecting 'covid'.
www.digitaltrends.com...
After The Biden Administration took office,
coronanews123.wordpress.com...
Syringe Injectables sponsored by Bill Gates is actually APPROVED.
FDA TO APPROVE SYRINGE-INJECTABLE BIOCHIP, NANOPARTICLES IN COVID TEST, POSSIBLE NUREMBERG CODE VIOLATIONS (“ONCE WERE THE LIVING”)
This was only approved under the Biden Administration because of the close ties with Covid. Either way, happy hunting. Welcome to the world's most Evil Man. So evil he had to actually tailor a 'kids cartoon' to show how 'amazing' he is. Despite his horrid dealings and manipulations of the world, just to hide behind a few 'good' deeds he's done in his life... Bill Gates Cartoon
But behind that logic, even the Devil has a few good deeds under his belt. Including Promoting "free will" through temptations.
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: OrionHunterX
You are mis-labeling it. It would appear to be the 'USA virus', from that list.
Inflicted on the world by the USA.
And they started by unleashing it on China.
You just need to slow down the production
The big flaw in your theory is that reducing population would reduce earnings. Why would they want to do that?
originally posted by: surfer_soul
By production i assume you mean reproduction? One way to do that is have a vaccine that renders 70% of the female population infertile. As the OP suggests.
The big flaw in your theory is that a large population has something to do with increased earnings. The vast majority of the worlds population are poor, the globalists call them “useless eaters”
originally posted by: surfer_soul
So you think making people infertile is ok then?
By terminating I was referring to another posters comments “it’s us or it nature” Like someone has to go... I’m all for preserving nature, but it’s human greed that’s the issue, not population.
Consumers dependent on scraps and handouts/welfare/benefits , who hold hardly any of the global wealth collectively, in the economic scheme of things they do all the work but have the least assets/wealth.
originally posted by: surfer_soul
Well much of that work is done to support the current population, if the population were to gradually decline much of that work wouldn’t be necessary. Also in the developed nations the work has already been exported to the developing nations (cheaper labour) leaving many dependent on benefits/welfare. These people aren’t needed in an economic sense.
Also according to the WEF we are shifting to a resource based economy, which will be quite different to the consumer based one we have now. Because of most likely and artificial scarcity of resources, people will be allotted only a certain amount of resources they can consume. Smart meters and appliances will automatically track what is being used in the home, AI will monitor and allocate resources to where they are required etc..
originally posted by: surfer_soul
I was suggesting the poster terminate themselves if it was them or nature before making out its other people that are the problem. It was to make them think about what they were saying, you have misunderstood me entirely.
You said yourself that an increasing population puts pressure on nature. We are stuck on a planet with limited resources, and however much it can support it can’t support a growing population indefinitely.
I think the the plan is to make roughly 70% infertile. It would be a fairly gradual reduction then and the most humane way in the PTBs eyes. Fertility rates have already declined in some developed nations, with a growing number of elderly to support. Which is the real reason so much immigration has been allowed to happen in these countries.