What questions still exist about January 6th?

Quite a few folks seemed to be upset that there wasn't going to be another investigation into Jan 6th. Several have been done so far, and we have learned that John Sullivan was an ANTIFA activist, that pretended to be a Trump supporter and was directly behind Ashley Babbit when she was shot, he even was the one to get the footage of the incident. He was paid by CNN for his work. We know that Office Sicknic died of natural causes and his death has nothing to do with the riot.

The only questions I may have left is were any other protesters/rioters tied to the left wing establishment as John was. Everything else seems to have been answered. Which seems to confirm that the only reason to make another inquiry would be to keep this in the forefront for another election cycle. As it's a crime to waste a great gift such as this was to the left.

link to article on John Sullivan

Yet, in footage streamed to his followers on Discord, Sullivan, who uses the name “Jayden X” on the app, can be heard inciting violence from inside the U.S. Capitol and boasting about breaking a window.

“If we don’t get in, we’re going to burn this sh*t down,” he gloats. “Let’s go! This sh*t’s ours. F*ck yeah. I can’t believe this is reality. We accomplished this sh*t. We did this sh*t together.

“I didn’t know I hit [the window] that hard. No one got that on camera… F*ck the blue! F*ck the blue!”

This footage comes from a source who wishes to remain anonymous for security reasons.


Moments after Sullivan captured Air Force veteran Ashli Babbitt getting shot and killed in the Capitol, a blonde woman accompanying Sullivan who appears to be his accomplice, Jade Sacker, gleefully exclaims, “We did it!”

“You were right! We did it,” she boasts.

“Dude, I was trying to tell you. I couldn’t say much,” Sullivan replies. “Is this not going to be the best film you’ve ever made in your life?”

So please explain what other things we need to learn about this event, and maybe we will find that indeed another look is warranted.

originally posted by: network dude

So please explain what other things we need to learn about this event, and maybe we will find that indeed another look is warranted.

I would actually like an investigation into why the DC mayor turn down additional support, why the cops moved the barriers away, opened the doors, stood around with zero defense other than to shoot one unarmed woman, why was ANTIFA breaking windows and trying to incite the riot?

But that isn't what Congress wants to investigate...

I think the "wire tie" guy being a Trump guy was debunked a while back along with other Democrat bulls#t stories.

Some other Democrat operators were proven to be "on the scene" as well I believe 😃

And there's some big I.D. questions about the guy that sat in Nancy's office too 😃

MSM reports are real thin with credibility 😃

We know that at least some members of Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are on the fed pay role.

I would like to know just how many and what were their instructions. How many antifa are on the same pay role, what were their instructions and who gave the orders?

Why did some capital police protect the building while others opened the doors?

Why no national guard after requested by capital police?

So please explain what other things we need to learn about this event, and maybe we will find that indeed another look is warranted.

I'd certainly like to know the answer to a couple things:

1) What organized groups were involved?
2) What were the objectives of any groups involved?
3) What level of coordination existed between groups involved?
4) What members of government had any kind of coordinated involvement?
5) Were any groups involved funded by outside organizations?
6) If there was outside funding, what were the objectives of outside organizations?
7) What coordination existed between any sources of outside funding and members of government?

That's just off the top of my head & there are likely many more that follow on from these. These seem like exactly what can be discovered by a true investigation.

a reply to: IagainstEye

those sound like logical honest questions that should be answered. We had the FBI look into this, although their track record for being unbiased is not too good. The Capitol Police looked into it, I believe they answer to Pelosi, so same deal.

It will be interesting to see if there is a group that is truly not biased, and is interested in finding the truthful answers to questions like those.

a reply to: network dude

What questions are left?
None whatsoever.
We all know that this wasn’t any sort of insurrection, anyone that thinks it was is a brain dead Leftist shill.
It was light years below what happened throughout the country last summer and is still going on now with Burn Loot Murder and all the rest of the butthurt clowns.
Trump incited it? My ass.

No "questions" need answered here. It is obvious to any "Real American" about Jan 6th.

It was nothing more than a blm or antifa riot. Only for a BETTER reason, by BETTER people.
And it wasn't even a "riot". But it is being sold as an "insurrection".

1. Pelosi lost her laptop, because she wasn't able, or willing to defend it. She's a "law giver". She "swore" to uphold the 2nd. Amendment. You'd think she'd know better.

2. An American Soldier, exercising her "right to protest", got shot and killed by a "leo", (corporate security guard), (revenue collector).
When thousands of Americans and their businesses, went up in flames by "insurectionist" blm and antifa folks during "peacful protesting". With Peloci onboard, blessing them in their protests.

3. BLM and Antifa being supported by Pelosi and her kind.

4. Me thinks? The LEFT is a hindrance to the nation, and are a threat, to the laws of our Republic/C.O.T.U.S..

NO, we don't all know that this wasn't any sort of insurrection.

I know what I saw. Own it.

a reply to: RazorV66

originally posted by: IagainstEye

I'd certainly like to know the answer to a couple things:

1) What organized groups were involved?
2) What were the objectives of any groups involved?
3) What level of coordination existed between groups involved?
4) What members of government had any kind of coordinated involvement?
5) Were any groups involved funded by outside organizations?
6) If there was outside funding, what were the objectives of outside organizations?
7) What coordination existed between any sources of outside funding and members of government?

That's just off the top of my head & there are likely many more that follow on from these. These seem like exactly what can be discovered by a true investigation.

Sounds like you are talking about BLM... What funding do you need when something lasts for a few hours and then all leave at curfew? What was the objective too as most looked bewildered talking selfies as they walked around. What would have been the objective there?

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: network dude

What questions are left?
None whatsoever.

I'm not so sure of that. I wish somebody could compile all the footage that was being recorded that day, (there was a WHOLE lot of it), compare the timestamps and get an accurate timeline of who did what where and when. I think the fact that it all went south just when Arizona was about to object to the election with information they had is important. When the session was reconvened, no states objected to anything. And Arizona didn't get to finish what they were about to start.

I think if a proper timeline was compiled, we could see that it was probably coordinated to break right when Arizona started to speak and that was the whole objective of the "disruption."

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
NO, we don't all know that this wasn't any sort of insurrection.

I know what I saw. Own it.

What exactly did you see... What did they actually accomplish with zero weapons and little resistance from the cops? One would think they could have easily done anything they wanted to do, so maybe they did with the selfies.

This needs to be investigated and verified 100% because AOC is a known instigator and liar bullssitt artist 🤣


Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reveals she's attending therapy and learning to 'slow down' after Capitol riot🤣

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to go to therapy after the January 6 Capitol riot.

She told Latino USA on Friday that members of Congress effectively "served in war" during the event.

The lawmaker also said the Trump administration had many people "in a very reactive mode."

Some may have answered this question for themselves , or had it answered for them by pushers of conservative propaganda. However this ''interpretation is far from being an established ''truth''.

Indeed, Sullivan had been associated with Antifa. However he had moved on from that group. Those of that group had disavowed his activity with them before he decided to visit the rally. He was a schmo looking for his own notoriety.
He had orchestrated a number of other ''rallies'' looking to be the center or focal point of those rallies.

His attendance on Jan 6 was an attempt to garner fame for himself as a ''journalist'' who caught much of the riots on film. And yes he helped urge on some of the rioters. So that he could film them. He was a lone actor in his actions.

Now true or false, this demonstrates just how there are still questions about Jan. 6th. Some will believe one thing and others will believe another. Proof is not completely substantiated in either direction.

www.politifact.com...

The weakly answered questions about Sullivan is one example of how the questions about Jan 6 remain unanswered.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

using politifable as a source doesn't have the same clout it used to.

Sullivan was an agitator, listen to his own words, not some biased source.

a reply to: network dude

You are offended by the link I offered. Fine. There are plenty more places to go but I will not help you find them Dude. I know you well enough to know that you will just dismiss them as well. You have found your own '' unbiased'' sources so all that offer something other than what you have found must be ''biased'' .

Still, the ''questions'' have NOT all been anwsered. Maybe for you but for so many others, no.
Carry on Dude.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
NO, we don't all know that this wasn't any sort of insurrection.

I know what I saw. Own it.

a reply to: RazorV66

LMAO
Like you own Burn Loot Murder and the rest of the goons destroying cities across the country?
You were probably involved in some of it.
Jan 6th was a picnic compared to that mayhem.

originally posted by: MiddleInsite
NO, we don't all know that this wasn't any sort of insurrection.

I know what I saw. Own it.

a reply to: RazorV66

I saw this on Inauguration Day 2017. Looks a lot more violent than what happened Jan 6th. Funny, the word "insurrection" never came up.

originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind

originally posted by: RazorV66
a reply to: network dude

What questions are left?
None whatsoever.

I'm not so sure of that. I wish somebody could compile all the footage that was being recorded that day, (there was a WHOLE lot of it), compare the timestamps and get an accurate timeline of who did what where and when. I think the fact that it all went south just when Arizona was about to object to the election with information they had is important. When the session was reconvened, no states objected to anything. And Arizona didn't get to finish what they were about to start.

I think if a proper timeline was compiled, we could see that it was probably coordinated to break right when Arizona started to speak and that was the whole objective of the "disruption."

Ok let me rephrase that.....
There are no questions left at all about any involvement by Trump and his supporters.
There are always questions about the Dems and their supporters conduct involving their sleight of hand shell games.

I would like to know about the meeting at Trump International hotel the night before which included many from the inner circle and Tommy Tuberville who is pictured there, yet claims he never was.

I would like to know about Enrico Terrio's visit to the WH before the "it'll be wild" tweet. He said he was invited. The WH backtracked saying no he was on a self guided tour, but as a convicted felon he wouldn't pass the necessary security check needed in advance of the tour.

I would like to know who was given a tour of the Capitol in the days prior and by whom, considering tours were not generally permitted due to Covid.

With over 150 police officers injured including eyes gouged out, what happened to Blue Lives Matter?


And why did so many middle aged people gleefully post pictures of themselves, as they said "on the front lines" hitting police, breaking windows and barriers claiming they needed to stop the certification, yet claimed they couldn't understand why police were trying to stop them. What made them think that trying to physically stop the electoral process was ok?