It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
EXCLUSIVE: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor' and WAS created by Chinese scientists who then tried to cover their tracks with 'retro-engineering' to make it seem like it naturally arose from bats, explosive new study claims
An explosive new study claims that Chinese scientists created COVID-19 in a Wuhan lab, then tried to cover their tracks by reverse-engineering versions of the virus to make it look like it evolved naturally from bats. The paper's authors, British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sørensen, wrote that they have had 'prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China' for a year - but were ignored by academics and major journals. Dalgleish is a professor of oncology at St George's University, London, and is best known for his breakthrough creating the first working 'HIV vaccine', to treat diagnosed patients and allow them to go off medication for months. Sørensen, a virologist, is chair of pharmaceutical company, Immunor, which developed a coronavirus vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has share options in the firm. The shocking allegations in the study include accusations of 'deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data' at Chinese labs, and it notes the silencing and disappearance of scientists in the communist country who spoke out. The journal article, exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com and slated for publication in the coming days, is set to make waves among the scientific community, as the majority of experts have until recently staunchly denied the origins of COVID-19 were anything other than a natural infection leaping from animals to humans.
Their new paper says these features of SARS-Cov-2 are 'unique fingerprints' which are 'indicative of purposive manipulation', and that 'the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.'
sample with a 96% match with the virus, a young medic's damning findings, and bat cave trip that killed three miners... the Mail dossier that can no longer be ignored
There can't be many jobs more hellish than that given to three Chinese miners in the mountainous province of Yunnan in April 2012. Tasked with cleaning out an abandoned copper mine in the county of Moijang, they found themselves in caves knee-deep in piles of guano — a foul-smelling combination of bat faeces and urine. As horseshoe bats roosted overhead, and rats and shrews scurried around in the droppings and muck, the men dug for hours at a time in the stinking, airless space. After two weeks all three had developed a severe, pneumonia-like disease. Three younger men were dispatched to take over but soon they, too, were suffering breathing problems, coughs, and fevers in excess of 39c (102f) — symptoms later described in an obscure Chinese medical paper and which are strikingly similar to the disease we know now as Covid-19. The six miners were moved to the No 1 School of Medicine at Kunming Medical University — more than 100 miles away in the provincial capital — where they were put on ventilators. Within months, three were dead.
The revelation gives fresh impetus to long-standing claims that the novel coronavirus virus — official name SARS-CoV-2 — originated not at the Huanan seafood and wildlife market in Wuhan, or at any of the other suggested 'ground zeros', but via a leak in a Wuhan laboratory. So could the virus (or a related variant) that infected the miners — and which is known to have been studied in Wuhan — be the cause of a global pandemic that has caused 168 million confirmed cases and at least 3.5 million deaths to date? It is a substantial leap to make in what is a complex narrative, but there are grounds for serious consideration, not least the genetic similarities between the Moijang cave virus and SARS-CoV-2 as I shall explain. Of course, this isn't the first time that the 'lab leak' theory has been mooted as the cause of the pandemic. For many, the likelihood of a novel virus emerging in the very city where labs specialising in coronavirus research were located was always too much of a coincidence. But such claims were dismissed more or less from the start.
originally posted by: tamusan
Like I said before. This was all started by a lab worker being bit and peed on multiple times by a bat. Whether or not it was tweaked by humans or not is still a valid question though.
originally posted by: liliththedestroyer
a reply to: kingparrot
iIwas going to say the same thing, but this has already been discussed, my theory was a person got infected with Covid at the lab and went into the wet market to purchase food, and infected the people in that market. It didn't come form a bat, it came from the lab. last year, it was a crazy conspiracy theory and people thought you were nuts for bringing it up, but i always knew th truth and now they are stating it did! Well duh?! Fauci funded it, and he can deny it all he wants but the fact is they have messing with this virus since 2014! China admitted that they purposely unleashed it as a bio weapon. I think it's extremely weak. Why not unleash Ebola or something more deadly?
originally posted by: kwakakev
I did consider the wet market origin for a few days, maybe a week or two when trying to work out what was going on in the Wuhan crematoriums. Something was released from that lab. Not all cases of Covid are SARS-CoV-2. How the spike protein was engineered for the ACE2 receptor was a dead give away. Now how the vaccine is all engineered around this vital body and reproduction molecular messaging has the 'kill em all' approach.
originally posted by: LanceCorvette
All this "is it" "no it isn't" "yes it is" over the past year is all part of the psy-op.
The real goal was having an exercise to see what it would take to get 100% submission to a government mandate - in this case, wearing a mask.
The sheeple, well, they put one on the day they were told to.
But this "man made muh deadly" fake new information is geared toward those of us who said, "my body can handle a natural virus, that's what bodies do".
So they say "Lance, it's not natural and the only way to prevent it is to mask up."
It's all a psy-op.
The mask wasn't the submission part.....that can't be tabulated. That was solely to see if folks would chastise others, similar to the yellow star. The submission stats are still coming in from those that got a jab....this is the true test for submission. Getting the numbers of folks who have no clue what they are getting, but just trust the pharma companies and government to get the jab. These are the stats they are looking for.