If I follow the science, where does it teach about more than 2 genders?

www.foxnews.com...

An elementary school physical education teacher in Virginia was placed on leave after an explosive speech in which he told his school board he wouldn't "affirm that a biological boy can be a girl and vice versa," Fox News has learned.

During a Loudoun County school board meeting Tuesday, teacher Byron "Tanner" Cross voiced his opposition to policies surrounding gender.

"My name is Tanner Cross and I am speaking out of love for those who are suffering from gender dysphoria," Cross told the board. He went on to discuss a "60 Minutes" special about the issue.

Here is a perfect opportunity to teach this educator a lesson. If someone here could list the peer reviewed science that explains all the different genders, we can finally put this thing to rest. I mean, we really should be looking to science for all this right? I suppose now it's just a matter of finding the book that lists all the proper pronouns to be used and when.

But please don't mistake this for some transphobic hate. I believe you have the right to think you are anything you want. That isn't for anyone but you to decide. It's like the rule that you are free to have your good time, and I fully support it, as long as your good time, doesn't mess with my good time. If you want to bring your good time, and mess mine up, then we are going to have friction.

Currently, there are two known genders, Male and Female. God made it fairly easy to tell. If you can write your name in the snow, you are male, if not, female. This is and has been science for a very long time. Now we learn new things every day, and new things come about to change our paradigm. If peer reviewed science can explain more than 2 genders, we will all learn something new. So here is the chance to present that information. Go!

www.mayoclinic.org...

Make up as many genders/roles as you want.

There's only 2 sexes when talking about human beings, however.

‘Follow the science’ -that’s three more words the left changed the definitions of to fit their narrative.

originally posted by: network dude
Currently, there are two known genders, Male and Female.

What if you're a herm?

But but but it feelz like there’s more!

a reply to: network dude


Interesting vid here about Bill Nye the propaganda guy.

Apparently Netflix have gone back into his science programmes and 'edited out' the parts about XX and XY chromosomes.

See 6:15

There's also info in there about a 1969 document from the President of Planned Parenthood to the head of Rockefeller's population council which discusses putting sterilants in the water supply.

Cheers.

a reply to: network dude

If you can write your name in the snow, you are male, if not, female. This is and has been science for a very long time.

So one day I wake up bedridden. My catheter bag is full. A nursing assistant who appears to be female, prepares to empty the bag.

I say, "How about this once, you take the bag outside and write in the snow for me."

She says, "Okay. As long as no one sees."

Then, when the coast is clear, she does it.

Question: Does that make her male and me female?

originally posted by: pthena
Question: Does that make her male and me female?

No, just weird. Which is fine.

a reply to: network dude
A man can get all of the hormones he wants and a fake vag and breasts, but he will always be a man at the chromosome level.

a reply to: network dude

I suppose now it's just a matter of finding the book that lists all the proper pronouns to be used and when.

Damn sure won't find it in the Bible.

You say follow the science, mention nothing scientific about gender.

Then mention god, you then say this is not about transphobia, then try and weasel out of this being biased with some nonsense about your "good time" and how it doesn't bother you yet you feel the need to create this post?

Now either you have a christian transphobic agenda or you are willfully ignorant and prejudice?

Stop using god and phoney science to back up your bias and read some scientific studies on gender

Although I pretty certain you won't read that.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: network dude

I suppose now it's just a matter of finding the book that lists all the proper pronouns to be used and when.

Damn sure won't find it in the Bible.

Do you mean you will not find a reference to something other than male and female in the Bible or that the book is utter nonsense?

a reply to: network dude

The argument about gender is not a biological one.
it's a metaphysical one.

If you believe in the soul then you can understand how inside a person can feel feminine, masculine or nether.
It's not their bodies they are talking about . It's the them that is inside that body that feels different.

Do you believe in a soul separate from the physical body?
Do you believe that the soul can have male, female, or neutral (energy) characteristics?

a reply to: network dude

Loudon County is stepping up to the plate the past few weeks! It’ll never happen in Fairfax Co. or Arlington, but at least there are some surrounding pockets of sanity.

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: network dude

The argument about gender is not a biological one.
it's a metaphysical one.

If you believe in the soul then you can understand how inside a person can feel feminine, masculine or nether.
It's not their bodies they are talking about . It's the them that is inside that body that feels different.

Do you believe in a soul separate from the physical body?
Do you believe that the soul can have male, female, or neutral (energy) characteristics?

You know, y’all trying to defend this trans agenda change your minds about what it is, every other day. Get your stories straight.

a reply to: network dude

If someone here could list the peer reviewed science that explains all the different genders, we can finally put this thing to rest.

How about wikipedia? That's peer reviewed and edited.
XY_sex-determination_system

The XY sex-determination system is a sex-determination system used to classify many mammals, including humans, some insects (Drosophila), some snakes, some fish (guppies), and some plants (Ginkgo tree). In this system, the sex of an individual is determined by a pair of sex chromosomes. Females typically have two of the same kind of sex chromosome (XX), and are called the homogametic sex. Males typically have two different kinds of sex chromosomes (XY), and are called the heterogametic sex.[1]

In humans, the presence of the Y chromosome is typically responsible for triggering male development; in the absence of the Y chromosome, the fetus will undergo female development. More specifically, it is the SRY gene located on the Y chromosome that is of importance to male differentiation. Variations to the sex gene karyotype could include rare disorders such as XX males (often due to translocation of the SRY gene to the X chromosome) or XY gonadal dysgenesis in people who are externally female (due to mutations in the SRY gene). In addition, other rare genetic variations such as Turners (XO) and Klinefelters (XXY) are seen as well. In most species in XY sex determination, an organism must have at least one X chromosome in order to survive

So:
homogametic,
xy males,
xx males,
xy gonadal dysgenesitic,
Turners,
Klinefelters,

Then there are the ZW sex-determinant animals and even "A temperature-dependent sex determination system is found in some reptiles and fish."

I guess that's the science part.
Once you mix the science up with religious philosophy, and psychology, and societal norms, and political partisan polemics; well then it's all just a big old mess.

a reply to: [post=25908268]network dude[/post


It does Not . Science Must Acknowledge the Rules of Nature and Physics . To Deny them is Unscientific .

originally posted by: MiaBandetoh

Stop using god and phoney science to back up your bias and read some scientific studies on gender

Although I pretty certain you won't read that.

I read it, from Scientific American, no less, and total poppycock. You call THAT "science"? And even if you accept that twisted nonsense as an absolute, cutting off your breasts and attaching a stick doesn't make you male, nor does cutting off your stick and making a pretend hole while you snarf a bunch of hormones make you female. And to then claim you are female and compete in female sports is a complete travesty.

Yes, thee are some genetic defects in nature, and that's what they are: mistakes. Don't point to mistakes as proof of anything being "natural."

[snipped]

a reply to: MiaBandetoh

I don't understand how anyone that believes in a soul wouldn't be pointing to trans people as proof of a souls existence.

they are literally telling us that whats inside them is different than the body.

What else would be inside them if not a soul?

originally posted by: pthena
a reply to: network dude

If you can write your name in the snow, you are male, if not, female. This is and has been science for a very long time.

So one day I wake up bedridden. My catheter bag if full. A nursing assistant who appears to be female, prepares to empty the bag.

I say, "How about this once, you take the bag outside and write in the snow for me."

She says, "Okay. As long as no one sees."

Then, when the coast is clear, she does it.

Question: Does that make her male and me female?

Interesting conundrum. I'll have to consult the magic 8 ball.

It said, "a favorable outcome is likely". So things are looking up!