a reply to:
theatreboy
Yeah I wouldn't put it past them using toxic vaccines to push this agenda through, it's 100% open for interpretation by whomever is in power, not even
healthcare officials, only politicians. Then to be enforced by a judge who once again is not in the medical field. The only medical rulings a judge
can make is if someone is mentally stable enough to stand a trial, and even then they need backings from actual doctors. They can't even make that
ruling without support of court appointed doctors.
Of anyone actually looks at the bill head on and isolated words like "clarity and evidence" people will argue that it's a requirement. Already seen
people try to push that motive.
But in the world where math and logic is compliant, even in general programming if this information with all the ifs/ands/maybes/opinions and buts..
it would cause an infinite loop error on the first line. Because each branch of "may or may not" adds a new trigger point for a separate event.
In short they have it written, so anyone can perceive it as a single path but in actuality there's more branches then a family tree. Which means it's
a 100% open ended bill that "is not limited to" things actually posted there.
An example is "belief" that someone is contagious enough that just by breathing. Legal requirement is based on "situation of the opinions of the
delegate/governor" and can be witheld based on "current circumstances".
While they try to initiate blind rules, "any means deemed necessary to protect" can literally be shoot to kill orders under the ruse of protecting the
people. This is NOT limited to just people in custody.
This type of legislation opens the doors to executing opposition of opposing parties that try to run against the current elected officials. By name or
description.
This type of legislation, not only puts loopholes in place where court orders don't even need to be filed, by release and rearrest. Your not even
permitted a defense or hearing under whatever circumstances they believe one might have.
Last but not least, even if this legislation was used to better our world. Let's make an example, 20 people are infected on an aircraft, they spread
their ailment. 6 people show symptoms and get arrested, the rest are let go. This still permits the remaining 14 people who are asymptomatic to
continue the spread of the virus or contagion.
Passenger manifest must be obtained by court order, so let's say they take it a step further. Already a majority of these people are out the door and
have direct contact with family members, friends and more continuing the spread.
Now let's pretend every corner of an airline has cameras with facial recognition software. To Round up not only people who boarded flights between
airports, but people who said goodbye, cabs, etc.. then every person transportation of said person was in contact with..
Their contacts and their contacts contacts(everyone they have been in contact with). It would take months to round up every person that has in some
way been in contact with anyone who was originally at the airport. At the said time of spread.
Not even forgetting the incubation and spreading period before symptoms even begin to show. Making this legislation 100% useless, while giving power
to those who aren't the slightest bit qualified to make any form of judgement calls.
In shorter words, this legislation does nothing to prevent dangers from entering the public and is highly situational tht depends on closures being
done at all airlines a sick individual and anyone around them being done in the matter of minutes being discovered. It's a severe waste of resources,
in assuming that every airline #s down bars and all trapping everyone inside across the country.
Either way if not for the 404 errors on coding, and infinite loops, as well as lack of manpower to even begin such a thing. The actual targets will be
opposition of any and all forms instead of being used for any real beneficial reason. Because this legislation is not viable on a grand scale. Unless
all windows and doors literally lock down at say every airport world wide at the first sign of a sniffle or sneeze.
Cause let's be realistic here, how many of you travelled from east to west coast by airline? Imma use this as a prime example. There is no direct
flights between New York and California, The average of airports a person must go through is a minimal of 2, but more often then not 3 airports to
get to their destination. These are NOT small airports, a standard flight from NY to California will either have you stop in Texas or Chicago, and
both of those are just as busy as ANY main city subway.
My other main point is with this open legalisation bill, they know EXACTLY what they are doing. These are politicians after all, filling in loopholes
is like sex to them. Especially when stripping away more rights for control over others. These are the people that write the laws for lawyers to
enforce and decide if someone was wronged, with high profile cases sliding because of loopholes purposely left in place.
Even by a miracle this does not pass legalisation as is, and doesn't make its way to a permanent bill. You can bet your asses it will become the next
pet project hidden amongst a desperately needed BILL to pass in parts or if not entirety. Among the 1000pages of bull# that lobbyist demand.
Be on the lookout for anything that benefits the american people, and be sure to read through it all with a fine tooth comb, because chances are at
least part of this will wind up in the bill.
edit on 27-5-2021 by BlackArrow because: (no reason given)