Eric Clapton detailed his “disastrous” health experience after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine

originally posted by: chiefsmom
Good for him for being in the public eye, and still having the courage to speak the truth about his experience.

Indeed! Clapton's speaking out reminds me of Roger Waters' speaking out against the treatment of Julian Assange. It's good to see courage amongst the older musicians.

originally posted by: BlueJacket
Chelsea Handler is sick and deaf in one ear, 4 hours after shot 2...and that Moderna...you know the company that never made a successful vax?

She's fine.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: BlueJacket
Chelsea Handler is sick and deaf in one ear, 4 hours after shot 2...and that Moderna...you know the company that never made a successful vax?

She's fine.

huh..error message?

a reply to: LordAhriman

She’s fine?

Just like 99.96% of ALL people who contract the China virus?

That’s good.

There is NO requirement for mass vaccination against such an innocuous ‘threat’

The VAST majority of people who contract the minor China virus, are fine

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: LordAhriman

She’s fine?

Just like 99.96% of ALL people who contract the China virus?

That’s good.

There is NO requirement for mass vaccination against such an innocuous ‘threat’

The VAST majority of people who contract the minor China virus, are fine

It's about 98%

a reply to: LordAhriman

Oh no

SHUT THE WORLD!!!!!!!

a reply to: Doctor Smith


Eric Clapton is an Idiot , CONFIRMED .

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Most of the articles you will find on this are spinning that Clapton is mistaken. That the Experimental MRNA treatments are perfectly safe. Clapton states that he has been mislead by extreme media propaganda. And he is exactly right. These 2 articles did a good job of just stating Clapton's thoughts on the matter without spinning it.

Eric Clapton’s Anti-Vaccine Diatribe Blames ‘Propaganda’ for ‘Disastrous’ Experience

Eric Clapton blames ‘propaganda’ for ‘disastrous’ COVID vaccine

Stop tryig to mislead people astrazenca uses the old method where they actually infect you with the virus. This is why MRNA vaccines are safer you dont get the virus and cant get the virus from it. Whats happening here is the British government wants to use a British company to buy the vaccine from. This still hasnt been approved for use in the United States and at this point likely wont. Because through studies the MRNA vaccines have been shown to be much safer. as well as effective.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
Eric Clapton is an Idiot , CONFIRMED .

Correction: He WAS an idiot, for taking the vaccine 2 times. He's now no longer an idiot, clearly, as per his open letter and coming out against the vaccines and lockdown. Good on him.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
a reply to: LordAhriman

Oh no

SHUT THE WORLD!!!!!!!

1 in 50 people is not a problem?

a reply to: LordAhriman

Most of the numbers add up to less than 1%. And that's with all the misdiagnosed influenza A and B added in.

Where did you get 2%? Even though 2% is also a very low death rate. You'd be a fool to get those shots even at 2%.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
Most of the articles you will find on this are spinning that Clapton is mistaken. That the Experimental MRNA treatments are perfectly safe. Clapton states that he has been mislead by extreme media propaganda. And he is exactly right. These 2 articles did a good job of just stating Clapton's thoughts on the matter without spinning it.

Eric Clapton’s Anti-Vaccine Diatribe Blames ‘Propaganda’ for ‘Disastrous’ Experience

Eric Clapton blames ‘propaganda’ for ‘disastrous’ COVID vaccine

Stop tryig to mislead people astrazenca uses the old method where they actually infect you with the virus. This is why MRNA vaccines are safer you dont get the virus and cant get the virus from it. Whats happening here is the British government wants to use a British company to buy the vaccine from. This still hasnt been approved for use in the United States and at this point likely wont. Because through studies the MRNA vaccines have been shown to be much safer. as well as effective.

You call yourself a doctor???????????????? You are absolutely wrong. Or you are a liar. Just go away troll.

Viral vector-based vaccines, such as those developed by AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, use a harmless virus, or adenovirus, as a delivery system to trigger the immune system to create antibodies to fight off an infection by SARS-CoV-2, which is the virus that causes COVID-19. The adenovirus is not SARS-CoV-2 itself, but rather a different, harmless virus that has been manipulated so it’s unable to replicate and cause illness. Adenoviruses are viruses that cause the common cold and there are many different types, which have been used for decades to deliver instructions for proteins, Health Canada explains on its website. In the case of COVID-19, the vector virus delivers specific genetic instructions to the cells in the body to produce a harmless piece of SARS-CoV-2 called the spike protein. The cells then display this spike protein and the immune system triggers a response.

What is the difference between mRNA and viral vector-based vaccines?

a reply to: Doctor Smith

Ok time for your further education first

Adenoviruses are common viruses that cause a range of illnesses. They can cause cold-like symptoms, fever, sore throat, bronchitis, pneumonia, diarrhea, and pink eye (conjunctivitis). You can get an adenovirus infection at any age.Now this is relatively harmless as our immune system takes them out as long as they don't overpower it. This is why pink eye is relatively rare. To make it safe they kill the virus before injection well most of it anyway some still can survive. And yes people can have severe reactions to Adenovirusses especially if you have had them before.

Now mRNA doesn't use any virus at all therefore your immune system cannot be attacked it simply creates the spike protein the virus uses so anything with that protein is attacked by your immune system. So mRNA doesnt react the same way at all making it much safer.

Now I get it your an anti vaxer but you have to at least have some education in chemicals or biology to understand this. Your way out of your league here you keep either intentionlly or through stupidity miss representing the vaccines.

a reply to: dragonridr

You seem to think that the astrazenca vaccine is the same as regular vaccines of the past.

The astrazenca vaccine is a (viral vector vaccine). Instead of a synthetic code (amino acids) it uses a real virus to program your cells. Like mRNA vaccines, Viral vector vaccines also program the cells RNA to cause the cell to produce the same protein spike as the mRNA vaccines.

Viral vector vaccines are not normal vaccines like the vaccines of the past. Normal vaccines use denatured or weakened pathogens for the body to react to making antibodies.

It is not clear which is safer. mRNA or viral vector vaccines. They are both DNA experimentation drugs. Use at your own risk.

originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: dragonridr

You seem to think that the astrazenca vaccine is the same as regular vaccines of the past.

The astrazenca vaccine is a (viral vector vaccine). Instead of a synthetic code (amino acids) it uses a real virus to program your cells. Like mRNA vaccines, Viral vector vaccines also program the cells RNA to cause the cell to produce the same protein spike as the mRNA vaccines.

Viral vector vaccines are not normal vaccines like the vaccines of the past. Normal vaccines use denatured or weakened pathogens for the body to react to making antibodies.

It is not clear which is safer. mRNA or viral vector vaccines. They are both DNA experimentation drugs. Use at your own risk.

They use a pathogen to infect cells just like every vaccine produces earlier. The difference is they reprogram the virus to infect cells with specific instructions. But its still the same process. mRNA vaccines avoid this step of infection completely since no virus is used. They simply put the RNA into a peptide delivery system. Meaning no virus is used.

As far as safety RNA is only survivable for a limited time about 2 hours. It affects cells that our body uses to produce antigens so its effects are very limited. It's basically limited to our immune system. You attempt to create fear by misrepresenting the vaccines. For 99.9 percent of people, it would be safer to have it than not take the vaccine.

But with any vaccine there will be people that have adverse reactions, Just to let you know the covid vaccine has shown fewer side effects than things like birth control. More people have died from birth control than the corona vaccine. To expect it to work on everyone is just stupid there isn't even food that everyone can eat.

You go out of your way to fight the vaccines I've seen your postings and frankly you lie a lot or maybe you yourself are being misled I'm not sure. But I would suggest maybe changing your approach to ask questions instead of making claims you don't seem to understand.

There is a lot of people on ATS with the background to answer your questions. Try something new ask questions about the vaccines and learn something new instead of making judgements and trying to find things to fit your beliefs.

a reply to: Doctor Smith

"Safe" is a relative term. Anyone who says they can't cause harm is simply lying. I had a patient who died from the vaccine, no other possible cause of death.

It's a question of what is your risk from harm if you get the vaccine vs if you don't, and then making an informed decision.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Doctor Smith


Eric Clapton is an Idiot , CONFIRMED .

He’s also the most overrated guitarist of all time.
And the reason Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead (the one guitarist that can’t be over rated)

originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Doctor Smith


Eric Clapton is an Idiot , CONFIRMED .

He’s also the most overrated guitarist of all time.
And the reason Stevie Ray Vaughan is dead (the one guitarist that can’t be over rated)

Though I agree Vaughan is better or was I'm going to be honest, and say Clapton is pretty damn good. Crossroads has one of the greatest rock guitar solos ever recorded.

a reply to: dragonridr

I strongly disagree. Give me two years and I’ll have you blowing that solo out of the water every time.
youtu.be...
Texas Flood-now this is a guitar solo!

I like the way I play guitar more than those 2. But they're good.