China Busted Planning WW3 With Biological & Genetic Weapons - Including Coronavirus

a reply to: infolurker

I’m not one to defend nor have any kind words about the CCP though I would be extremely surprised if our governments in the west haven’t discussed and planned how to wage biological warfare against our enemies. It would actually be remiss of them not to, as disgusting as it sounds. Wars a gritty business.

a reply to: infolurker
And you think Porton Down (England) and Fort Detrick (USA) are not doing the same? Or collaborating with Wuhan? Or these governments are not funnelling funds to Wuhan to experiment with stuff like this? Follow the money is a very good expression.

a reply to: CthulhuMythos

That's one of the reasons they don't like us calling it the China virus.
I'd say it should really be named the Globalist joint venture virus.
They've tried very hard to whitewash the origins of this thing .
If we get the truth, the involvement of all responsible parties would be under scrutiny.
On the other hand, if it was just China then people would expect there to be consequences that the rest of the world seem afraid to address.

Just my speculation.

a reply to: infolurker

China are late to the game , Russia and the United States have been working on Genetically engineered bio weapons for decades.

Many countries and regions, where 30 years ago biotechnology merely meant brewing beer and baking bread, have established high-tech facilities for vaccine or single-cell-protein production that could be subverted for the production of biological weapons. Today, nearly all countries have the technological potential to produce large amounts of pathogenic microorganisms safely (Fig. 1). Second, classical biowarfare agents can be made much more efficiently than their natural counterparts, with even the simplest genetic techniques. Third, with modern biotechnology it becomes possible to create completely new biological weapons. And for technical and/or moral reasons, they might be more likely to be used than classical biowarfare agents. These possibilities have generated new military desires around the world, including within those countries that have publicly renounced biological weapons in the past. This paper deals predominantly with the last two factors, and with the use of real-life examples, we shall discuss the possibilities for such military abuse of biotechnology.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

I remember reading a decade or so ago of research by the US into ethnic-bioweapons that could target enemy forces but leave friendly forces untouched , handy for arenas like Afghanistan.

Not defending China but nobody has clean hands here.

a reply to: Gothmog



Thanks Goth! Also, shout out to the intellectually depraved didn't mean to forget you guyz(people).

a reply to: infolurker

We have our own think tanks that do the same.

A plan for every scenario or eventuality that may arise.

Canny sit there with stockpiles of WMD and enough nukes to destroy the world several times over whilst complaining about the competition, as its simply poor form.

Anyroad the source is the Daily fail have to wonder as to the veracity of the information there if im honest.

As expected but the US, but the UK... assuming the story is correct.

every major player in the last 50 years has worked on bioweapons, here is the question which country either intentionally or accidently released a pathogen that wrecked the worlds economy...

a reply to: infolurker

China has a strict no first strike policy. It's an important part of the national psychology to think of itself as being a victim rather than an aggressor, so it absolutely will not strike first. Doing so would be nearly unthinkable.

In short, it doesn't matter what China has, because it's not going to use it unless somebody else attacks China first.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
As expected but the US, but the UK... assuming the story is correct.

every major player in the last 50 years has worked on bioweapons, here is the question which country either intentionally or accidently released a pathogen that wrecked the worlds economy...

Covid simply isn't effective enough to be a bio-weapon. It mostly attacks the elderly, the over weight and people with diabetes. The people who are least economically active and who aren't known for their part in warfare.

It's just not credible as a weapon.

a reply to: gortex

Didn't Putin accuse the US of trying to obtain DNA samples from Russians some time ago?
I'm sure I read that somewhere but it wasn't a big news story and disappeared quickly.

a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

From your quoted source:

...some of them can cause SARS disease in humanized mice models and are untreatable with therapeutic monoclonals and you can’t vaccinate against them with a vaccine. So, these are a clear and present danger…

Interesting! So why all the emphasis on "the vaccine"???

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Irishhaf
As expected but the US, but the UK... assuming the story is correct.

every major player in the last 50 years has worked on bioweapons, here is the question which country either intentionally or accidently released a pathogen that wrecked the worlds economy...

Covid simply isn't effective enough to be a bio-weapon. It mostly attacks the elderly, the over weight and people with diabetes. The people who are least economically active and who aren't known for their part in warfare.

It's just not credible as a weapon.

It doesn't need to be.
The lock down and the resulting effects from interruption of medical treatment, operations and diagnoses is going to be felt for years to come.
Add a spike in suicides and ruined lives from lost businesses and isolation for those living alone and the cumulative effects of all these things will be quite horrific.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Irishhaf
As expected but the US, but the UK... assuming the story is correct.

every major player in the last 50 years has worked on bioweapons, here is the question which country either intentionally or accidently released a pathogen that wrecked the worlds economy...

Covid simply isn't effective enough to be a bio-weapon. It mostly attacks the elderly, the over weight and people with diabetes. The people who are least economically active and who aren't known for their part in warfare.

It's just not credible as a weapon.

Well, one point of note here, the ChiCom flu IS consistent with the Chinese philosophy of war though. As you note, they won't strike first...unless they can look like they're not striking first. Specifically, the Chinese philosophy is about slow and constant pressure, not about a decisive strike and victory. Kind of a death by 1,000 cuts kind of thing.

So, from this perspective C-19 actually does serve a weaponized purpose. Yes, it kills the elderly and the weak, but at the same time it demoralizes their opponent and crushes his economy, further demoralizing him (us).

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Irishhaf
As expected but the US, but the UK... assuming the story is correct.

every major player in the last 50 years has worked on bioweapons, here is the question which country either intentionally or accidently released a pathogen that wrecked the worlds economy...

Covid simply isn't effective enough to be a bio-weapon. It mostly attacks the elderly, the over weight and people with diabetes. The people who are least economically active and who aren't known for their part in warfare.

It's just not credible as a weapon.

Anything that was blatantly a weaponized biological (i.e. higher mortality rates, impact on broad segments of the population) would trigger a war.

The trick is to inflict economic damage, fear and chaos in the enemy without making your enemy suspect it was you that released the agent.

I've no idea whether or not the release from Wuhan was intentional, but what does it matter. The Western countries and their economies are still reeling 1 year+ after the event. In 2020 China's GDP actually had net growth, but not the US, not the EU, all other industrialized nations' GDP contracted.

Hmmm....

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

Exactly what I was saying above you! Excellent point!

Death by 1,000 cuts, not one massive wound, which would be easy to identify the source of.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

The restrictions imposed by our own government have been disastrous, too.
There are positive health benefits from fresh air and exercise, healthy diets and pleasure from socialising and sunshine.

We've been concentrated into the big supermarkets . Limited shopping options.
Encouraged to eat take away food.
Exposure to sunshine and exercise limited.
Enforced isolation and depersonalised by mask use.

Add the constant doom and gloom and death threats from the media into the mix and I feel like the government has been more lethal than the virus.

The US thought the worst-case was losing an aircraft carrier to China, and here China was preparing for something very different and far more horrific.

Straight from Art of War actually. "Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected"...

originally posted by: lostbook
This is alarming news. If we're hearing about this then there must be something even worse that the public isn't privy to...

What is worse is that we already lost the war; China's engineered Caronavirus has an enhancement that when a second pathogen is introduced into a pollution the two would combine to become even more deadly.

After the first stage of the attack was seen to be successful, China in secret tell the other world leaders its finger is on the button and that they must agree to surrender. After months of seeing their economies crumble; seeing that they could not create an effective vaccine against a Caronavirus that mutates; and being assured a place of distinction by their new Chinese leaders; most of the world's leaders capitulate.

The only significant holdout is the US president Donald Trump; who threatened to expose the situation to the world. After Trump makes some test exposure remarks blaming China for the Caronavirus the world leaders who did surrendered make it clear to Trump that he himself is vulnerable to the combined power of China and their new Vichy allies (including members of the US congress); Trump reluctantly backs down from exposing China until after his reelection where he felt he would have more room to fight back. China and the Vichy allies make sure Trump does not win reelection.

Because the US has a tendency to value individuality over collectivism and because it has the might to mount a resistance China also had to foster internal civil unrest in the US. AS an enemy who is fighting amongst themselves does not have the ability to project outward. After Trump is removed from office the Chinese install a man both suffering dementia and who has been corrupt with foreign influence for decades (including China) as the next US president that they control from behind the mask.

After Biden's inauguration he signed the USA Instrument of Surrender in secret and WW3 comes to an end with China the victor and new world leader. Now the general public will be groomed for full disclosure over a prolonged period of time so as to avoid a resistance.

originally posted by: 19Bones79
a reply to: infolurker


I remember a simpler time when Hillary Clinton with her vast experience assured us Trump is wrong about China and that Russia is in fact the bigger threat.


What a glorious time that was for intellectuals and sensitive, nuanced souls.

I'm convinced she's the one who paid china to release the virus in the first place.
She sure got awful quiet after her boss obama didn't cheat hard enough for her to win the election in '16, but the deep state blackmail ol' bill took when he got into office is still serving them well, still getting their enemies suicided.
She never did go to prison for her crimes against humanity, so instead she kept doing what she does best- her part for the party.

Now that its practically public knowledge that the virus is manufactured, how long before the vaccine crowd catches a whiff of whats going on?
Who am I kidding, this will never make public news.

a reply to: dandandat2

Well if that doesn't paint a grim picture, I'm not sure I know what does!