How Michigan Election Was Compromised - Forensic Video Evidence Release by Law Firm

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: Vector99

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Vector99
So, instead of productive discussion/debate, you choose the childish route.

There is nothing productive about morons like the guy linked in the Original Post that claim they have proof. Know why? Because they don't. They deserve ridicule and contempt.

And you know this to be 100% fact because you looked through everything they presented?

Or just some feels?

I get it that you want someone to actually address the claims made in the video. OK, I watched the video, so here's what I took away:

The lawyers who are desperately trying to prove massive amounts of corruption, fraud, or whatever, in
Antrim county hired a computer security specialist to hack into a Dominion voting machine and alter some code that switched votes from Biden to Trump and vice versa, while leaving all the other votes unchanged.

Let me begin by saying that I don't doubt that someone sufficiently skilled in hacking COULD do that if they somehow got unimpeded access to a Dominion voting machine.

However, at no time in the video did the specialist claim to have any evidence whatsoever that someone actually DID get access to a voting machine or that someone actually DID change votes in that way.

In fact, there are two lines of evidence that that didn't happen.

First, Trump actually won Antrim county by a substantial margin. If the dastardly Democrats hacked into the machines (would it take more than one machine?) for the purpose of swapping votes between Biden and Trump, does that mean that Biden actually won? Did the Democrats commit voter fraud for the purpose of making Trump win?

No, they did not. The reason we know that is that no votes were switched one way or another. The reason we know that is that a hand recount of all the ballots in Antrim County was performed and validated the results of the machine counting within the usual margin of error. (That means that Trump actually picked up 12 more votes out of nearly 16,000 cast, after the hand recount). As the security specialist pointed out in his video, if someone had switched votes between Trump and Biden, then the paper ballots would NOT have agreed with the machine generated tally and audit trail. But they did agree.

QED

well done sir. You took the time to confront the facts.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

(Trump) lost to a dementia addled cretin because people got tired of his clown show antics.

No, Trump lost to an extremely biased non-journalistic media and left leaning cancel culture brainwashing corporations.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

she's a clown

As my father used to say..."Pot meet kettle"

originally posted by: PurpleFox
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Can you comment on what was in the video please instead of being your typical douchelord self for once?

Leave him alone he brings much needed comedy relief to the mud pit!

originally posted by: 1947boomer

First, Trump actually won Antrim county by a substantial margin. If the dastardly Democrats hacked into the machines (would it take more than one machine?) for the purpose of swapping votes between Biden and Trump, does that mean that Biden actually won? Did the Democrats commit voter fraud for the purpose of making Trump win?

No, they did not. The reason we know that is that no votes were switched one way or another.

I'm an elections judge here in Texas and I can address that first point for you: it would have involved rigging hundreds of machines *and* the evidence would be immediately discoverable.

Before an election starts (that morning, before polls open), we run a printed report from the ballot counting machine and it has to show all zeros on everything. If there is data in the machine, the tabulation will show it and it will throw the ballot count off.

And secondly, paper ballots are preserved (as we've seen) and a recount would quickly have shown a mismatch (as you point out) between ballots cast and votes received.

Multiple copies of the results are kept. I have the packets from this election (local election) that I am obligated to keep for two years in case there's a question. This packet includes a printout of the results of how many votes there were for each candidate and for each proposal. I have one and there are two duplicate packets that are sent to different locations.

All someone would have to do is request the judges to bring in their sealed envelopes and compare them with what the county has and what the state has. Bingo... instant proof of fraud if they don't match.

a reply to: Byrd
Cool story bro, that doesn't address the intense push back from an otherwise harmless audit.

Infact, if its as easy as you say, why the games and gimmicks?

Not an easy answer, huh?

Btw, election judge? You like them results for the Special Election run off? How about Critical Race theory push back? Keeping Texas RED.

originally posted by: Realtruth
Biden and Trump votes were swapped in Michigan, irrefutable proof via forensic analysis with the official election software, in a real-time video

I personally could care less about sides, partisanship, or the any of the cry-baby games that constantly go on between sides, however when it's about the Real Truth, the lack of, or absolute corruption of our country I have a problem with that.


I think this may have implications on electronic voting from here on out.


Original link to the law firm

Attorney DePerno team proves Dominion Voting Machines can switch votes

Again this dead horse? Sidney Powell told you is a a BS made up lie, NewsMax told you it was a BS made up lie, OAN told you it was a made up lie, the pillow guy will be broke by the end of the year, Lin Wood will probably be in jail by the end of the year, Rudy will definitely die in jail and you all still believe this crap?

I swear to God that one of these day Imma jump on the Q/ right wing conspiracy gravy train. Seems to be the easiest money ever made.

originally posted by: The2Billies
Nothing will come of voting corruption and changing votes from Trump to Biden. Why? The Democrats won't let it. TPTB won't let it. The Mainstream media won't let it.

...
The Supreme Court will cut a deal with the Dems, that if they don't enlarge the court, they won't take the case.

The Supreme Court has already been intimidated by the Democrats, that is clear.
...

You are confused. We don't need the Supreme Court to do something about it.

We need State Legislatures that aren't afraid to exercise their Constitutional authority and do their Constitutional duty.

No courts needed. The Legislatures can simply declare the election results void for fraud, and either do a full state-wide recanvassing and audit (including the paper ballots and discarding fake and obvious fraudulent ones) and doing a hand recount discarding any and all invalid/illegitimate ballots, and based on the results, unseat the fake winners and seat the real winners in all down ballot elections, then vacate their D/Biden Presidential electors, and appoint new R/Trump electors, or simply hold special elections under special rules that will insure a valid election.

I prefer simply doing the full audit/recount.

a reply to: Bunch

Your post is not only delusional, but emotionally conceived.

Seriously, I've never met an ATS user who's own stats are ratioed, I mean, you have more post than stars 😂 seems your words are dismissed most of the time with a grunt and eye roll.

a reply to: Bunch

Sydney Powell, Newsmax, and OAN? Question: Who told you? It's obvious you've never listened to any of the sources you quoted.

a reply to: Arnie123
Oh no!! Your imaginary “make me feel good” stars. Lol what a waste of a life if you think that’s valuable in any way, shape or form.

originally posted by: Bunch
a reply to: Arnie123
Oh no!! Your imaginary “make me feel good” stars. Lol what a waste of a life if you think that’s valuable in any way, shape or form.

Oh? "A waste of life?" What's with the immature language? Are you unable to have a discussion coherently?

I get it, salty and angry, even after Trump, now that's a sad and wasted life 🤫

a reply to: Arnie123
It ain’t me that needs to live in an echo chamber of lies to get my “feel good” lol

originally posted by: Bunch
a reply to: Arnie123
It ain’t me that needs to live in an echo chamber of lies to get my “feel good” lol

Correct, you don't "need" to live in an echo chamber, you're just choosing to *shrugs*

I mean, an NPC such as yourself makes that abundantly clear just by what you post 😌

a reply to: Arnie123

Just keep giving your monies to this guy. He is serious and will get the job done. He will find that smoking gone and Trump will be back in power by August. Trust him... trust them all but more importantly... don’t forget to donate... and a lot.

a reply to: Realtruth

Of course they can hes altering the database in SQL. Its simple to confuse the software if you manipulate the database. There is no software on the planet that would catch you altering a database. Realy not sure what these people think happened though im very sure someone is going to allow someone to connect an SQL server to a voting machine and change the data. and if they did it would show if someone examined the database. This is well stupid saying you can do omethng and showing it happened are entirely different. They obviously couldnt find a problem with the database or they would have said something.

a reply to: dragonridr

Who would have been allowed to look who also was competent in the subject of electronic auditing?

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: dragonridr

Who would have been allowed to look who also was competent in the subject of electronic auditing?

Whoever the state hired to take care of the voting systems they bought. I would hope your state is not stupid enough to buy a machine and not send someone to learn how to use it.

a reply to: dragonridr

You'd be surprised...do you have any clue if and who your state hired...and if that's party was inpartial?

Edit: I see you meant someone from the company who made those machines...well that's pretty laughable as it has already been shown the folks running the company in charge of most machines were pretty untrustworthy.