It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Intolerance so often comes from the left with words like 'Uncle Tim' and the 'n-word' being used against me," Scott said. "And last night what was trending in social media was 'Uncle Tim,' and they doubled down on this concept of liberal oppression. It is stunning in 2021 that those who speak about ending discrimination want to end it by more discrimination."
"The left has doubled down that they are going to, not attack my policies, but they're literally attacking the color of my skin," he added.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude
The ideology that the left is embracing is using a faux racism issue to usher in Marxism as a solution to racism.
Also of note;
If democrats and the left have control of universities, entertainment, social media platforms, education, sports. . .
Then why is there "institutional racism" unless they are the cause of it.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The stunning hypocrisy is that the Republicans thought that by getting the only black Republican in the Senate to try to rebuff any trace of systemic racism in the US today would convince any black people that he was sincere and looking out for them.
So you can produce proof that Sen. Scott was only elected to provide "cover" for Republican racism?
thehill.com...
He said it's at least the third time he's gotten a call from a supervisor or chief of police since he joined the Senate.
More broadly, Scott said that in his life he has had a number of interactions with police that are similar to those expressed by black men around the nation. He said that in one year, he was pulled over seven times by police.
"I do not know many African-American men who do not have a very similar story to tell, no matter the profession, no matter the income, no matter their disposition in life," he said.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The stunning hypocrisy is that the Republicans thought that by getting the only black Republican in the Senate to try to rebuff any trace of systemic racism in the US today would convince any black people that he was sincere and looking out for them.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ketsuko
So you can produce proof that Sen. Scott was only elected to provide "cover" for Republican racism?
I didn't say that. I said he was [blatantly] chosen to give the Republicans rebuttal to Biden's Address to Congress because he was black.
thehill.com...
He said it's at least the third time he's gotten a call from a supervisor or chief of police since he joined the Senate.
More broadly, Scott said that in his life he has had a number of interactions with police that are similar to those expressed by black men around the nation. He said that in one year, he was pulled over seven times by police.
"I do not know many African-American men who do not have a very similar story to tell, no matter the profession, no matter the income, no matter their disposition in life," he said.
His presentation, saying that America is not a racist country goes against his personal story and testimony and was seen as being especially hypocritical and insincere.
originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The stunning hypocrisy is that the Republicans thought that by getting the only black Republican in the Senate to try to rebuff any trace of systemic racism in the US today would convince any black people that he was sincere and looking out for them.
So then the truth emerges ?
It's not about Black or White , It's about party politics and whether or not your going along with the Program .
Even his black skin could not protect him from being attacked by the Left , yet another preview of the true Left they care nothing for minorities but only care what minorites can do for them on the Chess Board.
a reply to: Sookiechacha
I didn't say that. I said he was [blatantly] chosen to give the Republicans rebuttal to Biden's Address to Congress because he was black.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I didn't say that. I said he was [blatantly] chosen to give the Republicans rebuttal to Biden's Address to Congress because he was black.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The stunning hypocrisy is that the Republicans thought that by getting the only black Republican in the Senate to try to rebuff any trace of systemic racism in the US today would convince any black people that he was sincere and looking out for them.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I didn't say that. I said he was [blatantly] chosen to give the Republicans rebuttal to Biden's Address to Congress because he was black.
And now we know how Kamala Harris was made VP.