Screw Google Drive, get your VAERS compilation here

Google's removal of the Frontline Workers and VAERS report is currently being discussed here
However, I believe this information is very important and shouldn't be lost deep in comments and therefore deserves its own thread. Get it while you still can.

(And for anyone still using Google, for the love of all that is good and holy please switch to DuckDuckGo when searching.. You'll instantly notice the difference when your info isn't being filtered.
No longer will you see 15 Snopes links, debunk videos and alphabet news station articles flooding your results, especially for anything conspiracy.)

Here you can access the compilation
Frontline Workers Testimonies_News Reports_VAERS data_11APR2021.pdf

Screw Google
Keep fair and righteous access to information free and flowing

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

All information needs to be available for any of us to make informed decisions.

Thank you for this thread.

There are always two sides to any issue, and whenever one side gets silenced in any way by a third party (such as the media or a tech platform), that tends to make me suspicious.

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

Better yet, forget the middleman.
vaers.hhs.gov...

While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.

a reply to: Phage
Absolutely the opposite of clear and concise info sourcing
VAERS is clunky and tedious to comb through for minimal info
Designed to be as off-putting to the casual comber as possible
That's why this compilation exists in the first place
To condense and present information in a much easier form to digest
Photos, clearly laid out info and of course all the social media examples
Full explanations, timed reports, news and media sources...
Simply the number1 source of this type of info available anywhere period

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

I'm sure Frontline offers a very unbiased sample of VAERS reports and is careful to explain their shortcomings.

Hey, wait minute. That's the gish gallop "document" that was being discussed elsewhere. Nothing to do with a "VAERS compilation." Your title is deceptive.

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

Thank you!

a reply to: Phage

Why do you think that a diagnosis of covid-19 as cause of death is used so liberally? Yet these same officials and pseudo-health agencies are so quick to make sure that doubt is cast on any negative consequence a person had after being injected with these experimental therapies? Hospitals/doctors/medical examiners were and are advised that they may give a diagnosis of covid-19 or call a death a covid-19 death even without a test or verification of infection whatsoever. Why are then so quick to do the exact opposite with diagnosing of negative events experienced after taking these experimental therapies?

a reply to: KansasGirl

Why do you think that a diagnosis of covid-19 as cause of death is used so liberally?

What makes you think it is?

Hospitals/doctors/medical examiners were and are advised that they may give a diagnosis of covid-19 or call a death a covid-19 death even without a test or verification of infection whatsoever.

You exaggerate.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KansasGirl

Why do you think that a diagnosis of covid-19 as cause of death is used so liberally?

Hospitals/doctors/medical examiners were and are advised that they may give a diagnosis of covid-19 or call a death a covid-19 death even without a test or verification of infection whatsoever.

You exaggerate.

That’s your opinion.

reverse corporatism in effect right now 😃

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

God Bless You ADAMandEVIL!

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: KansasGirl

Why do you think that a diagnosis of covid-19 as cause of death is used so liberally?

Hospitals/doctors/medical examiners were and are advised that they may give a diagnosis of covid-19 or call a death a covid-19 death even without a test or verification of infection whatsoever.

You exaggerate.

That’s your opinion.

He's got buyers remorse.
He actually believes that antibodies in the blood to the toxic sludge in his 'vaccine' will protect him from a virus in the lungs.
Listen to a real expert(that ain't you Phage)

thephaser.com...

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL
I know a girl that does medical coding for vaers. She just graduated and it was an easy contract to land. She told me about a month after she started (around late february) that they are several months behind and basically they cannot hire people fast enough to keep up with the reports as so many people were vaccinated so quickly. I wouldnt take that to mean the numbers are staggering ( tho that is what I personally believe), but once we reach the equilibrium of compliance vs non-compliance they will start to catch up and we will see some real numbers so long as they are not continuing to fudge them.

VAERS is a voluntary system composed of reports by people who choose to use it. When you get a shot they give you a brochure that says, "Please consider helping us out." Most of the brochures wind up in a convenient trash receptacle stationed nearby. It is not a comprehensive all-inclusive database. Most of it is reports of people who say, "My arm hurts!" But two days later when it does not hurt any more, they don't report back.

a reply to: schuyler

It isn't a "VAERS complilation." That is a misrepresentation. It is a gish gallop of media reporting.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: schuyler

It isn't a "VAERS complilation." That is a misrepresentation. It is a gish gallop of media reporting.

We don't disagree. Indeed, scientifically, it is virtually useless.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: schuyler

It isn't a "VAERS complilation." That is a misrepresentation. It is a gish gallop of media reporting.

What's the over/under on the number of times Phage uses gish gallop in this thread?

a reply to: ADAMandEVIL

Thank-you! It's critical to keep this information circulating around the internet.

If you come across a website with statistics and a link to circleofmamas.com... , please post it to this thread.

Knowledge saves lives!

The data in VAERS is used as per the disclaimer, they use it to establish if they need to go further analysis.

So when people point out anomalies, it's actually what the CDC uses VAERS for


The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.

a reply to: putnam6

The data in VAERS is used as per the disclaimer, they use it to establish if they need to go further analysis.

Indeed. But the document provided has nothing to do with VAERS.