Verdict GUILTY

The disrespect for the regular people on the jury is quite vile.
There is no evidence of any kind of any irregularities from the jury.
There is no evidence the jury did anything outside their duty.
Yet here I have read everything from their families being threatened to they were incompetent.
With absolutely no evidence.

You people understand these are everyday Americans undertaking their civic duty?

They are not politicians, or life long civil servants, they are volunteers.

I understand people will disagree with their verdict, but to pile on made up bs is disgusting.

originally posted by: MayRenee
I do have EMS training, and, I am well versed in law, professionally, and again, I saw it with my own eyes. Your showing your truth, it is ugly.

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: MayRenee

Did you take a 2 week course to be a firefighter, too, and spend 8 hours training to be EMS? Because your expertise is lacking in facts. Specifically those presented in court.

*you're

I'm putting myself in the shoes of a juror sitting there taking notes of everything that I was presented with from both sides. I'm not seeing your angle. It seems too influenced from the outside.

The worst part about all of our arguing. If he did not break the law none of this would have happened. None of it. If he simply went with the cops he would have OD'd later.

End of story.

a reply to: LSU2018

After everyone got pissed off about the cop, another video surfaced that showed the suspect swinging on the cop repeatedly before the cop got the upper hand.

And that's the point i made. If the Police Officer reacted the way he was trained to, and there is video evidence to that fact, then the officer has nothing to fear.

Also Police carry body-cams so any evidence he requires to back up his actions should be available.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Piling on made up bs is not exactly uncommon on here.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: shooterbrody

Piling on made up bs is not exactly uncommon on here.

Normally it is on politicians.
We have graduated to crapping on each other.

a reply to: LSU2018

You ever gonna address the intent claim you made and the video of the closing arguments I posted where intent was not required?

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: shooterbrody

Piling on made up bs is not exactly uncommon on here.

Normally it is on politicians.
We have graduated to crapping on each other.

No, it was crapping on the jurors.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Our jurors here are everyday Americans.
Those here crapping on them are everyday Americans.
Unless they are paid trolls, sock puppets...ect.

I assume most would not crap on their neighbors.
People on the jury are neighbors.

originally posted by: matafuchs
The worst part about all of our arguing. If he did not break the law none of this would have happened. None of it. If he simply went with the cops he would have OD'd later.

End of story.

There's nothing like an opinion from a qualified medic presented with compelling evidence.

And that's nothing like it.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Our jurors here are everyday Americans.
Those here crapping on them are everyday Americans.
Unless they are paid trolls, sock puppets...ect.

I assume most would not crap on their neighbors.
People on the jury are neighbors.

You assume wrong. Lots of folk crap on their neighbours.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2
Here, where I reside, we do not.
We still shovel snow off our older neighbors sidewalks.
To see everyday Americans crap on other everyday Americans is sad.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2


3) Causing someone’s death without intending the death of anyone, while committing a felony other than criminal sexual conduct (rape or sexual assault which would be first-degree murder) or a drive-by shooting

You seem to have a tenuous grip on reality, at best.

What does it say to you...lol

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: LSU2018

Dude his knee is on his neck. So much so that his foot isn't even touching the ground.....

Eureka! You didn't watch the closing arguments. Dr. Tobin spent over 120 hours working on his testimony and he worked it all based on that one split nanosecond of the toe coming off the ground. Eric Nelson destroyed that photo by matching the timeline of that photo with the timeline of the video and as Chauvin began to lose his balance, his toe came off the ground for a fraction of a second as he regained his balance.

I'm really not trying to argue with you (saving it for the asshairs). I agree Chauvin could have done things a little differently, but I don't for one second think he deserved to be charged with 2nd and 3rd degree murder. In my honest opinion, Aggravated Manslaughter would have fit his trial more than what he got, but he became the left's sacrificial lamb. Kim Potter will be next, and the Ohio cop who shot the girl trying to stab two other girls, will be after Potter. This has become a game to those people.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: LSU2018

Why wouldn't they quit?

If they did their job correctly they would have nothing to fear.

If they can't do that, they shouldn't be in The Police Force in the first place. Society don't need 'em.

They are doing their job right. Good ol great citizens come in after the fact and start recording, giving a skewed alternative to how the incident started and ended and how it got to the point it was at. I saw one video where a cop was beating a guy up. Started from that point. After everyone got pissed off about the cop, another video surfaced that showed the suspect swinging on the cop repeatedly before the cop got the upper hand.

As much as we used to always rely on video evidence, it's video that has now corrupted everything because it's always cherry-picked.

Cherry picked? Like your photo?

How is a video cherry picked?

It shows what actually happened.

That wasn't my photo. It was a photo being used to prove me wrong.

Thanks for accidentally backing me up. I owe you one.

originally posted by: matafuchs
The worst part about all of our arguing. If he did not break the law none of this would have happened. None of it. If he simply went with the cops he would have OD'd later.

End of story.

That's right. Every single bit of this could have been saved by simply complying. Then we could argue about which racist cop was responsible for not calling for help for Floyd and purposely letting him OD, or killing him by purposely taking him out of his mid-size SUV and placing him in another mid-size SUV after he screamed he was claustrophobic, thus killing him with claustrophobia.

We could rewind that entire scenario multiple times and we'd still get to the same ending.

originally posted by: LSU2018

Why wouldn't they quit? They can't do their job without the media painting an even bigger target on their back each time while news of a cop sitting in his car having lunch - getting blasted in the head and killed in cold blood - goes completely unnoticed.

The bigger question I have is what do they use now to restrain a person. Taser is now considered a form of lethal force, so a guy is fighting you and you can't do much....

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: LSU2018

After everyone got pissed off about the cop, another video surfaced that showed the suspect swinging on the cop repeatedly before the cop got the upper hand.

And that's the point i made. If the Police Officer reacted the way he was trained to, and there is video evidence to that fact, then the officer has nothing to fear.

Also Police carry body-cams so any evidence he requires to back up his actions should be available.

They do, and all four bodycams were presented during the trial and they showed the whole scene from all different angles. The bodycam footage is what ultimately caused me to change my mind about Chauvin.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: LSU2018

You ever gonna address the intent claim you made and the video of the closing arguments I posted where intent was not required?

I addressed that a few pages ago.

originally posted by: LSU2018
I addressed that a few pages ago.

I'm not seeing the reply.