It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Three or more acting with "common intent."
originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: Phage
Great law actually. Here’s the link to read it : Link
It does some interesting things:
1 limits cities etc from defunding police, makes such actions easy to counter by state officials and governor.
2 makes the city liable if they refuse to take action against riots
3 increases penalties if the crimes occur during a riot
4 not letting people out on bail if criminal action happened during riot until they have first hearing in front of a judge
5 gives mandatory jail time for assaulting an officer
6 protects memorials, tombs, and historical sites better
7 basically prevents all the dumbass things Democrat cities have been doing to encourage and enable rioters and stiffens the penalties for doing so both to the rioters and cities who would encourage them.
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: infolurker
Great day for the citizens of Florida. They no longer have to live in fear!
I just have to add, it made me moist when De Santis made mention of, "If you are a mayor of one of our cities and you allow this violence to happen? It will be on you!". That had to shake the sandy ground they are standing on quite a bit!
theconservativetreehouse.com... hit-road-blocking-protestors/
The law grants civil immunity to people who drive into protesters who are blocking a road, prevents people accused of rioting from bailing out of jail until after their first court appearance, and increases penalties for assaulting law-enforcement officers while engaging in a “riot.” It also penalizes local governments that interfere with efforts to stop a riot and allows law-enforcement agencies that face funding reductions to file objections.”
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Three or more acting with "common intent."
I thought "3's a crowd". I didn't know it was a riot too!
originally posted by: pianopraze
a reply to: Phage
Great law actually. Here’s the link to read it : Link
It does some interesting things:
1 limits cities etc from defunding police, makes such actions easy to counter by state officials and governor.
2 makes the city liable if they refuse to take action against riots
3 increases penalties if the crimes occur during a riot
4 not letting people out on bail if criminal action happened during riot until they have first hearing in front of a judge
5 gives mandatory jail time for assaulting an officer
6 protects memorials, tombs, and historical sites better
7 basically prevents all the dumbass things Democrat cities have been doing to encourage and enable rioters and stiffens the penalties for doing so both to the rioters and cities who would encourage them.
Neither one of you “know” anything about the subject apparently
•Define “riot” as a violent public disturbance involving 3 or more people acting with common intent resulting in injury to others, damage to property, or the imminent danger of injury or damage
So, it's accurate? (speaking of deflection)
Nice deflection;
Please show where I have done so.
Will you stop defending hypocrisy and madness?