Stanford Study- China Virus 1000X Smaller Than Mask Holes

a reply to: SourGrapes

Save the world put a plastic bag over your head!

a reply to: Lumenari

Replace Jude with Not Vaxxed.

originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: Lumenari

Replace Jude with Not Vaxxed.

😎

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: IAMTAT

I’ll preemptively insert a retort to the inevitable argument that the virus is carried on water droplets which are larger than the stated nanometer scales.

Water evaporates, many factors determine how quickly including air pressure, contact material temperature and humidity however at these scales you can be assured the vast majority of viral particles are unrestricted by face masks. That’s not even considering the other detrimental health effects from unhygienic practice associated with wearing masks.

You are correct on both counts. The virus is carried on liquid droplets which are larger than the filtration mesh size. And, water evaporates. However, viruses don't evaporate. They stay stuck to the fibers of the filtration media basically by Hydrogen bonds.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Contact surfaces, like those pesky fingers that we use to adjust and remove our masks every 20 seconds before contaminating everything we touch.

The correct language is the distance between adjacent mask fibers (thread count), not "holes".

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: LordAhriman

Contact surfaces, like those pesky fingers that we use to adjust and remove our masks every 20 seconds before contaminating everything we touch.

Wash your hands. That was always a CDC recommendation.

Nobody ever said the masks would stop transmission, just that if we wore them and took these other steps it could slow it down.

If somebody with an aerosol virus breathes in your face, you're probably going to get that virus. If they have a mask on, you probably won't.

This is "cover your mouth when you cough" pre-kindergarten stuff.

a reply to: LordAhriman

They also said, "15 days to slow the spread" a year later and how is that working out?

originally posted by: tkwasny
The correct language is the distance between adjacent mask fibers (thread count), not "holes".

The spaces between the fibers are literally holes.

Definition of hole:

1a : an opening through something : perforation

So no points given to you on your attempt at Nazi Definition Monitor.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: LordAhriman

Contact surfaces, like those pesky fingers that we use to adjust and remove our masks every 20 seconds before contaminating everything we touch.

Wash your hands. That was always a CDC recommendation.

Nobody ever said the masks would stop transmission, just that if we wore them and took these other steps it could slow it down.

If somebody with an aerosol virus breathes in your face, you're probably going to get that virus. If they have a mask on, you probably won't.

This is "cover your mouth when you cough" pre-kindergarten stuff.

Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve.

Remember that?

a reply to: LordAhriman

The filtering efficiency of cloth face masks depends on many factors, pore size, shape and density. Considering the vast majority of masks aren’t tightly fitted all we really do is re-direct the aerosols. Instead of people directly in front of you it’s people to the side and behind clouded in your vapour.

These clouds this doctor is exhaling, are you telling me they aren’t water vapour?

a reply to: Grenade

These clouds this doctor is exhaling, are you telling me they aren’t water vapour?

Water vapor is invisible.

originally posted by: Lumenari
Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve.

Remember that?

"We", as a country, never did the things they asked us to do to flatten that curve.

a reply to: Lumenari

Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve

Donald J. Trump. Right?

Trump's 15-day plan to slow the coronavirus' spread is too short, experts say. Flattening the curve could take at least several more weeks.

www.businessinsider.com...

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Lumenari
Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve.

Remember that?

"We", as a country, never did the things they asked us to do to flatten that curve.

So, are you saying that if we'd only have complied for two weeks, we wouldn't be wearing masks now? 🤔

a reply to: 1947boomer

Please show your source for this claim.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Lumenari
Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve.

Remember that?

"We", as a country, never did the things they asked us to do to flatten that curve.

But we did something because we sure did wipe out the flu! Magic how that worked out isn't it?

Two viruses, and we effectively wiped one out for the year, but it's still our fault we're being kept under house arrest with dehumanizing and uncomfortable face coverings on because we didn't do what they told us to ... but we did ... but we didn't ... but we did ...

They change that so fast I get whiplash.

a reply to: Phage

Depending on the air temperature it will condense back to liquid when cold enough.

Is this a better example?

a reply to: Phage

lulz 24/7 rent free right?

Orange man bad for agreeing with 14 days, but we are talking 1 year later and you are defending that? You are either joking or you yourself are the joke.

a reply to: ketsuko

but it's still our fault we're being kept under house arrest with dehumanizing and uncomfortable face

House arrest? It's a piece of cloth.

They change that so fast I get whiplash.

2 weeks was never going to be enough but Trump decreed that it would be. He also decreed that COVID would be gone by Easter.