Triangular UFO Footage Confirmed By Pentagon

a reply to: Lucidparadox

It flashes exactly like a strobe light, at exactly the same speed as a strobe light. But let's not assume it's a strobe light, let's assume that it's something relating to aliens, and throw the strobe light out. Makes total sense to me.

a reply to: Zaphod58

My favorite guess was when he said could be aestatic because aliens like to travel to earth to flash in our atmosphere so we can see how cool they are. Its like putting rims on a car i guess.

looks like someone dusted off a Vought V-173.

a reply to: anzha

A jet powered V-173 might be.....interesting.

Most likely a target array or drone..

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Lucidparadox

So aliens fly around with strobe lights for visual identification now?

Aliens want to be safe too

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Lucidparadox

It flashes exactly like a strobe light, at exactly the same speed as a strobe light. But let's not assume it's a strobe light, let's assume that it's something relating to aliens, and throw the strobe light out. Makes total sense to me.

If the DOD was truly worried about these, they’d be given the green light to engage. So far it’s been “observe”. The DOD engages every single piper cub that strays into no fly zones. DOD controls entire airspace over Iraq/Afghanistan EVEN when those air forces are no match. Yet, these flying pyramids and tic tacs get to operate unimpeded near CONUS and US military assets. Uh, no.

Let an F18 go hot on one of those UAPs and we will know exactly what it is and capable of.

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Could possibly be trying to deceive the witnesses, by having a strobe light. If it’s alien and getting close to another alien species I would assume one would try to blend in, not terrify. I dunno, I doubt it not really impressed with this footage to be honest. It’s a nice topic to discuss thou.

originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Could possibly be trying to deceive the witnesses, by having a strobe light. If it’s alien and getting close to another alien species I would assume one would try to blend in, not terrify. I dunno, I doubt it not really impressed with this footage to be honest. It’s a nice topic to discuss thou.

I can go to a museum and see the bones of great creatures that roamed the earth before man. I can go to an aquarium and see great fish/mammals of the deep. Until we can see and inspect an actual ET craft (supposedly been crashing all over the place for decades) or being, it’s just a theory.

I’m super interested in how far our human tech has advance beyond the public knowledge. Man is a smart cookie. I can’t explain how a light bulb works much less billions of transistors in an integrated circuit. There’s some really smart folks out there.

a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Yeah, I hear ya, give someone a 10 sec. video clip of some anomaly’s in the sky, and toss it out to the public and say it’s a ufo is lame. However if we have 10 mins of this footage perhaps we might have something. These type of videos are all the same blurry, short, and in the age of 4k cameras in phones this is unacceptable evidence of UFOS ETC. it’s a nice topic to discuss thou, just waiting like most of us for that high quality evidence.. 👍

As far a USA military tech, I am sure we have some amazing avionics these days.

originally posted by: Bicent
a reply to: PilSungMtnMan

Yeah, I hear ya, give someone a 10 sec. video clip of some anomaly’s in the sky, and toss it out to the public and say it’s a ufo is lame. However if we have 10 mins of this footage perhaps we might have something. These type of videos are all the same blurry, short, and in the age of 4k cameras in phones this is unacceptable evidence of UFOS ETC. it’s a nice topic to discuss thou, just waiting like most of us for that high quality evidence.. 👍

As far a USA military tech, I am sure we have some amazing avionics these days.

I might be mistaken but do we have 4K cameras with NVGs issued to sailors?

Last I read about the majority of NVGs issued to the general population of the military are no 4K resolution, not even close, massively affected by lights (eg strobes) so if the sailor had their phone on deck, during an incident they would likely be holding the camera up to an NVG trying to get a shot?

I have not served on a military ship so interested to hear from those who have.

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Lucidparadox

It flashes exactly like a strobe light, at exactly the same speed as a strobe light. But let's not assume it's a strobe light, let's assume that it's something relating to aliens, and throw the strobe light out. Makes total sense to me.

If the DOD was truly worried about these, they’d be given the green light to engage. So far it’s been “observe”. The DOD engages every single piper cub that strays into no fly zones. DOD controls entire airspace over Iraq/Afghanistan EVEN when those air forces are no match. Yet, these flying pyramids and tic tacs get to operate unimpeded near CONUS and US military assets. Uh, no.

Let an F18 go hot on one of those UAPs and we will know exactly what it is and capable of.

I say your right either its authorized to be there by someone or it would have several fighter jets chasing it on video in a restricted air space like around a carrier group. If you can see it you can shoot it down if it were alien seems like that would be a priority

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Lucidparadox

It flashes exactly like a strobe light, at exactly the same speed as a strobe light. But let's not assume it's a strobe light, let's assume that it's something relating to aliens, and throw the strobe light out. Makes total sense to me.

I'm not assuming it's not a strobe light because it looks like a strobe light...

I'm assuming it might not be a strobe light, because it's on an unidentified hovering upsidedown pyramid shaped aircraft that flys for hours with no visible means of propulsion, over our military ships and aircraft... And has alarmed the highest ranking members of the DoD I'm regards to national security. I'm assuming it might not be... based on the testimony alongside the video.. and not just the video alone. The pilots and crewmen who actually saw the objects in the video for longer than 15 seconds.

I think its the Governments revenge for all those UFO nuts who decided to try invade Area 51.
"Hey guys we know they are UFO,s"!!!

Things that make you go hmmm.

originally posted by: dragonridr

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Lucidparadox

It flashes exactly like a strobe light, at exactly the same speed as a strobe light. But let's not assume it's a strobe light, let's assume that it's something relating to aliens, and throw the strobe light out. Makes total sense to me.

If the DOD was truly worried about these, they’d be given the green light to engage. So far it’s been “observe”. The DOD engages every single piper cub that strays into no fly zones. DOD controls entire airspace over Iraq/Afghanistan EVEN when those air forces are no match. Yet, these flying pyramids and tic tacs get to operate unimpeded near CONUS and US military assets. Uh, no.

Let an F18 go hot on one of those UAPs and we will know exactly what it is and capable of.

I say your right either its authorized to be there by someone or it would have several fighter jets chasing it on video in a restricted air space like around a carrier group. If you can see it you can shoot it down if it were alien seems like that would be a priority

Isn't that exactly what they did with the Tic-Tac?

a reply to: UKWO1Phot

Pretty much - whilst on a routine training exercise- Fravor was vectored to his sighting by an un-named Ops officer aboard the Princeton

Makes you wonder what other encounters have been had.....or more specifically- why this one was publicly released and promoted so heavily?

Its not like conventional adversarial MASINT isn't a "thing" that is highly classified.
Unless you track something all the way from the Oort cloud- its likely Russian/ Chinese/system glitch/atmospheric - even if you cant identify it.

For all of this to be put out there with an official "we don't know what it is" tag means either illusory superiority has reached intelligence apparatus breaking levels of normality.......or they REALLY want people to believe there is an unknown threat.

I thought Navy ships have top of the range cameras, They can see clearly over a long distance. These are grainy pics from a few hundred feet away.

originally posted by: 11SK1180
I thought Navy ships have top of the range cameras, They can see clearly over a long distance. These are grainy pics from a few hundred feet away.

Cameras on board naval ships, and ships in general degrade quickly. It doesn't matter how "top of the range" they are. Sea salt and corrosion do a number on optics.

originally posted by: Darkpr0
That outline looks a lot like some of the other aircraft projects that have been posted here as UFOs in the recent past. Definitely appears to be a generally conventional aircraft rather than some of the oogie-boogie stuff people have posited before.

originally posted by: Darkpr0
I'm not sure why everyone is rushing to think that I'm claiming that the Navy is confirming aliens or other such nonsense. This was specifically posted here because of its similarity to the Wichita aircraft apparently photographed in broad daylight and contrailing some time ago.

Wichita Thread

For crying out loud...the triangle shape we see in the night vision video has absolutely nothing to do with the shape of the aircraft. The triangle shape is the shape of the camera's iris, and the light it's photographing is out of focus, so the shape of the aircraft is unknown.

These triangle shaped lights probably aren't triangles either, it's the same kind of thing called "bokeh", just out of focus lights.
Bokeh tests


This video shows a demo using probably a similar setup to what the Navy used and got a similar triangle shape from something that's not triangle shaped:
Navy Triangle UFO - Debunked

originally posted by: Jukiodone
For all of this to be put out there with an official "we don't know what it is" tag means either illusory superiority has reached intelligence apparatus breaking levels of normality.......or they REALLY want people to believe there is an unknown threat.

John Greenewald Jr has been doing FOIA requests for decades, claims to have done maybe more than anybody I think which may be true, so he's seen lots of documents about all the past shady stuff going on that was eventually declassified.

His hypothesis is that the government seems to be leaking things like a photo of a batman balloon and then claiming they can't identify it, calling it cube-shaped or acorn shaped UFO, but it looks exactly like the shape of a batman balloon. So, this gives the illusion of incompetence, but he says they are not that incompetent, so it's a psy-op to make people think they are incompetent. I was thinking the same thing about this triangle bokeh that if there are any competent analysts in the Navy they would immediately recognize the triangle is bokeh and not the shape of an aircraft.

Now, maybe Greenewald is wrong and the military analysts really are that incompetent that they can't recognize a batman balloon when they see one...and frankly I'm a little surprised everyone in this thread hasn't replied that's not a triangle in the triangle video since it's so obvious to me. So now I'm wondering if the Navy really figured out it's only bokeh, I still would like to think the Navy has some competent analysts who figured that out.

Greenewald explains his theory here, I can't think of a better explanation for why such nonsense is coming out, except that they want it to look like nonsense.

Back in early December 2020, the now infamous "Batman Balloon" leaked and was published. Although not popular at the time, I put forth a theory on why it may all be happening, and why it was seemingly so easy to debunk. This is an excerpt from that presentation. Now, in April of 2021, even MORE material is coming to light. And the Pentagon, just doesn't seem to care. In fact, on this recent round of material, it seemed a bit too easy to get a response from them regarding the leak, and they acknowledged it was all genuine. However, they wouldn't say if it was considered "unidentified." Why? This flashback to the theory presented in December of 2020, still holds water today. And maybe, even moreso.

originally posted by: TheGreazel
Why this grainy , borderline bokeh stuff , im not impressed , you would think with those decades of experience regarding this phenomena they would show something better to garner trust.

If John Greenewald's theory is correct, the objective is exactly the opposite of garnering trust, we are apparently meant to think the military is a bunch of incompetent idiots who can't recognize a batman balloon when they see one, or can't tell the triangle is bokeh and not a triangle.

originally posted by: 11SK1180
I thought Navy ships have top of the range cameras, They can see clearly over a long distance. These are grainy pics from a few hundred feet away.

originally posted by: AutomateThis1
Cameras on board naval ships, and ships in general degrade quickly. It doesn't matter how "top of the range" they are. Sea salt and corrosion do a number on optics.

The article I read said that they weren't using navy cameras to make this night vision video, the article said the sailors were using their personal cameras, and indeed this night vision video may have been made by holding up a personal phone cam to a night vision scope or something like that.

Why they are using personal cameras instead of all the super sophisticated navy equipment I can't say, unless that too is part of the psy-op.