It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: BrokenCircles
DMV.org is a privately run website with no affiliation to any state, federal, or local government and is no more relevant to the claim than the lawyers who’s blogs were cited as being the grounds for the “right” to pull over where you feel like it.
Neither the Virginia code or Virginia DMV agree with you but keep citing blogs, they’re really convincing.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: baggy7981
I wonder what the training is? My guess is that its an annual power point added to the hundreds of annual training poerpoint to check a box.
Ergo, no real training at all...and probably resentment. Which makes it worse.
If you want to have a private conversation, then use a private messenger. This is an open discussion forum.
If you don't want me involved in your special conversation, then don't reply back to me.
You don't have to be a dick about it.
Unsurprisingly, we're not the only ones who felt that these cops were in the wrong.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MykeNukem
Pulling over when you get lit up is common sense. Continuing to drive down the road for almost two minutes isn’t common sense, nor is it a “legal right” to do so regardless of how many blogs get posted about it.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened
These cases are close. In the original Floyd arrest, the coppers didn't check the $20 note first, but went straight in, guns drawn. So they had nothing to charge him with at the time except the word of some clerk on MAYBE a fake note. Why didnt they check that out first? Being a drug dealer and high, allegedly, is a non-starter cuz that is not what he was originally being detained for.
If you got pulled over and had a gun pointed at you for reasons only the cops knew, you would be pissed and ask questions too!
These are all training issues IMO. and lack of discipline and an inept system of thwarting bad behavior.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: LSU2018
If a target was painted on your back for the past decade,
It might be hard for you to do it, but perhaps ponder that..maybe this is how the driver felt..food for thought.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: LSU2018
You calling me Alt-Left!!!! MMMkay, thats just a bit of non-sensical name-calling. And wildly false. (And sounds a bit like a lefty-tactic).
My OP highlighted a specific incident, but also highlighted the afore-mentioned, but not commented on, statement that there was $300 million paid out last year in excessive force lawsuits, which surely means a failure in training.
I mean look at the latest headline, some chick pulls her gun thinking its a tazer???? If thats not BS, then it surely highlights a failure in training and standards...
originally posted by: lakenheath24
a reply to: LSU2018
You are laughing out loud at a cop with a gun, not a taser, drawn ...saying that phrase to a dude in uniform whose only fault was a tag violation? For real?
What about the "you should be" remark when dude says he is scared to get out?
I mean there is defending cops, and then there is this.