It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the 800 pound gorilla in the Geatz fiasco

page: 1
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+11 more 
posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 08:27 AM
link   
www.foxnews.com...

The wild extortion plot Gaetz alleges involves a $25 million payoff to help find missing ex-FBI agent Robert Levinson in Iran in exchange to help Gaetz get out of a federal probe involving a purported orgy with underage girls.


To start off, Matt Geatz is a single guy. If all this is true, he's been sowing his oats quite a bit. If he did it with a child, there are laws against that, and he is subject to the punishment of those laws. As are all people who break those laws.

But when you look at the statement from the accused blackmailer, you notice something strange. Well, to be honest, almost all of it is strange, but this one thing seems to have slipped by the attention of most. The blackmailer offered to make his investigation go away. That part isn't in dispute. It's in the statement by the accused person.

So now you kind of have to ask, where the charges used to facilitate this extortion racket? Was this a setup? does this kind of thing happen often? Do the other lawmakers and power players get the same deals when they do things like screw kids?

I'm a bit amazed that nobody seems to have any issue at all with this part of it.

Have money? you can screw all the kids you want, just pay the man on your way out.

this exposes a really sick part of the swamp I think we all know exists, and few want to discuss. It's a shame he couldn't use the fund already set up for all this, the tenured law makers use.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 08:37 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

This is exactly what I have said to my father in law and on another thread.

Something is rotten in Denmark with this whole situation.

Why would 2 ex intelligence officers decide all of a sudden to extort $25mill out of Gaetz.

Also who leaked the story that Gaetz was part of an investigation to the NYT, FBI leak.

The added situation of getting Levinson released as the carrot

Know one is talking about this side of the whole situation.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 09:16 AM
link   
do you believing matty regarding the extortion attempt?

do you think someone who's looking at possible sex trafficking charges would do try anything to get out of it?

his friend joel was arrested over a year ago. if matty is guilty he had to know his friend might talk. he's had a year to dwell on it and that's a long time to hatch a plan, imo.

who knows, but matty is the kinda slime who'd try anything, imo. it's all interesting to say the least. i personally wouldn't be surprised if matty was the one who leaked it all. get it out there so he can get the extortion plot out there, too. lol

the tucker interview.. all of it, very suspicious.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

You're right. Excluding ATS, where it's been pointed out multiple times, but Big Media doesn't want to talk about the extortion...

Keeping the public's attention on an underage girl (and not mentioning that she was with a "dating" service for this very purpose) and statutory RAPE. Gotta get the RAPE in there, because it suggests violence and brutality, rather than a consensual encounter. I can't even call it a relationship... well, I guess technically it's a business relationship.

I think Gaetz surprised them by going public. I don't think they ever expected that. If half of what I'm reading is true, he does seem to be quite the sex fiend. But in the big picture of perverts, it's rather vanilla... and sophomoric. I wouldn't be surprised if he was set up for blackmail/extortion purposes.

I'm wondering if this is just the tip of the iceberg, and that there is an actual pedophile ring attached to all of this, trafficking literal pre-pubescent children. Gaetz going public and bringing attention to it all could reveal far more than they ever wanted known. If they throw out the "pedophile" and "rape" charges enough now, it will confuse and dilute any news later about literal children, literal pedophiles, literal trafficking, and literal rape and abuse.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea

disgusting.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 09:50 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

I wondered if it could be a honeypot situation. It wouldn't surprise me that Democrats and Republicans set all kinds of traps for their opposition or attempt to exploit a known weakness. They may know he is single and banging escorts so they set him up. Or he could just be a dirtbag.

Don't know if anyone remembers Dennis Hastert. Republican speaker of the house convicted of child molestation. I recall reading a story that when the Denny Hastert story broke, Charles Rangel was asked about it and he just smiled kind of like everyone already knew what was up with him.

Politics is a dirty game. You'd have to be crazy to go into if you know you got some dirt. It will get exposed. However, it seems most of these people are too arrogant to even recognize their own weakness.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Boadicea

disgusting.


Yes, it is all quite disgusting. We're just not sure how disgusting it is yet.

But we both know it could get far more disgusting, don't we? For example, instead of a 17-year-old girl in the USA making her own poor decisions for herself for her own personal gain, she could be a Ukrainian or Russian girl with no rights being forced into prostitution and trafficked across international borders for the son of a high profile politician... even the highest office in the country. Girls who are pretty much sex slaves, used and abused and Heaven only knows what else. Or, it could be the son of a high profile politician running for the highest office in the land, when it comes out that he was inappropriately sexual with his own 14-year-old niece...

Right?



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Any proof yet? Is this once 17 year old not 18 a year later? Can we get proof she’s real?
This is no different than an anonymous source that we never get to see.

Could he be guilty, oh yea but he shouldn’t be until proven so.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
do you believing matty regarding the extortion attempt?

do you think someone who's looking at possible sex trafficking charges would do try anything to get out of it?

his friend joel was arrested over a year ago. if matty is guilty he had to know his friend might talk. he's had a year to dwell on it and that's a long time to hatch a plan, imo.

who knows, but matty is the kinda slime who'd try anything, imo. it's all interesting to say the least. i personally wouldn't be surprised if matty was the one who leaked it all. get it out there so he can get the extortion plot out there, too. lol

the tucker interview.. all of it, very suspicious.


Matt named names, and claimed to have tapes of the whole thing. So he either has the goods or he's totally lying. None of this make much sense, but it looks much more like a failed set up than it does anything else. If Geatz is guilty of porking a kid, he needs jail and all the love that comes with it. But if he's just a single guy with an ass load of viagra, and he's going after legal tenders, what law is he breaking?

He may be guilty, but calling him slime before you know the facts is something totally expected from you and yours and a lot of the reason we have such a divide between left. vs right.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:49 AM
link   
a reply to: TheLieWeLive

Considering it's the same 17 year old that lead to Greenberg being charged with sex trafficking of a minor, I'd say she exists.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea



Your previous post implied that Matt was most likely innocent but trying to expose the real sex traffickers, or did i read your post wrong?



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Brit-Tex
a reply to: network dude

This is exactly what I have said to my father in law and on another thread.

Something is rotten in Denmark with this whole situation.

Why would 2 ex intelligence officers decide all of a sudden to extort $25mill out of Gaetz.

Also who leaked the story that Gaetz was part of an investigation to the NYT, FBI leak.

The added situation of getting Levinson released as the carrot

Know one is talking about this side of the whole situation.


I think some folks are going to be squirming in the coming days.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

the person matt allegedly has tapes of is calling for him to release them.

oh jesus h christ, he's a slime and you know it. he' showed nude pictures of his girlfriends to his work buddies, ffs. WHO THE HELL DOES THAT??? Slime, that's who. jesus...


if a boyfriend of a daughter of yours was caught showing pictures of her nude to his friends, what would you call him?



edit on 4-4-2021 by knoxie because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-4-2021 by knoxie because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 10:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: network dude

the person matt allegedly has tapes of is calling for him to release them.

oh jesus h christ, he's a slime and you know it. he' showed nude pictures of his girlfriends to his work buddies, ffs. WHO THE HELL DOES THAT??? Slime, that's who. jesus...


if a boyfriend of a daughter of yours was caught showing pictures of nude girls to his friends, what would you call him?




I'd ask him to leave. But I think there is a difference between trying to screw everything that moves, and porking kids. You may not, but that's on you.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Boadicea



Your previous post implied that Matt was most likely innocent but trying to expose the real sex traffickers, or did i read your post wrong?




do you have alternative facts? We only know what has been released at this point. Kill him first and find out if he's guilty later eh?



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:01 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

i meant to say nude photos of your daughter, my bad.

my guess is you'd have a whole boat load of choice words. but, ya try to shame me for calling a man showing nude photos of his girlfriends to his work buddies slimly. LOLOLOLOL



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

you seem to be fast out of the gate accusing two fbi of extortion, tho.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: TheLieWeLive

Considering it's the same 17 year old that lead to Greenberg being charged with sex trafficking of a minor, I'd say she exists.


So what are they waiting on? Arrest Gaetz if there is any proof other than speculation. Him being looked at by the FBI means they are looking at everyone around Greenberg, as well they should.
It is just insane how they plaster “suspected” or “could have” all over the news and then in 6 months this will most likely be old news with nothing coming of it.
I didn’t know who Gaetz was before all of this, sure I’ve seen his picture but not a follower. If he is guilty then he should do the time. I’m just fed up with the finger pointing and accusations and nothing ever comes of it.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: network dude

You're right. Excluding ATS, where it's been pointed out multiple times, but Big Media doesn't want to talk about the extortion...


Do we know that the MSM are able to speak freely about the extortion?

If it's an ongoing case there may be reporting restrictions in place. We know that the big media love a good scandal regardless of whether it's somebody on the left or somebody on the right, and the fact that they aren't biting this makes me suspect that there is some kind of non-disclosure order in place preventing them form doing so.



posted on Apr, 4 2021 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: network dude

you seem to be fast out of the gate accusing two fbi of extortion, tho.




All I know is what was said. I haven't condemned anyone. Do you get points for an early call?

eta: the reason for this thread is more about why there is the choice to make things like this go away for the rich and famous, than it is about how guilty Matt may or may not be.
edit on 4-4-2021 by network dude because: Beto, what a stupid name.




top topics



 
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join