It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Boadicea
My wife is not infectious but has difficulty breathing with the mask on.
Once she became dizzy and almost fell at Target.
Had I not caught her...she could've severely injured herself.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: pteridine
So far it is an experimental treatment.
Clinical trials were completed. Many thousands of people took part in those trials.
At what point, in your mind, is it no longer experimental?
Yes, an EUA does not have the same standards as an approval. That is because EUAs are issued in an emergency situation, which is different from a non-emergency situation. An EUA is issued when an emergency calls for it. It requires that sufficient testing as been performed to demonstrate sufficient safety and efficacy are determined by trials to to point where the emergency benefits outweigh the risks. It is not an arbitrary decision, it is carefully considered after review of the clinical trials.
An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) means that it is not an approved product.
Do you think that an approval covers all potential long term effects? How long term do you reckon is enough to study before making a determination. 5 years? 20?
Long term effects are not yet known.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Boadicea
My wife is not infectious but has difficulty breathing with the mask on.
Once she became dizzy and almost fell at Target.
Had I not caught her...she could've severely injured herself.
If by "legal actions" you mean filing a claim for compensation, you are mistaken.It will be handled like any other vaccination claim, such as they are. If your claim is denied you can go to court.
The point is that an EUA is not an approval and not being approved may just have some bearing on any legal actions.
www.cnbc.com...
The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program “provides compensation to people who are injured or die from a vaccination, medication, device or other so-called countermeasure necessary to prevent, treat or fight a pandemic, epidemic or security threat,” according to the program’s website.
On March 10, 2020, then-Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar issued a declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act that authorized that program for Covid-related claims.
That is a very difficult sentence to read but it looks like a matter of opinion.
Vaccine passports are not necessary even though the CDC now ignores exposure to the disease leading to herd immunity and pushes vaccination as the route.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: pteridine
None of the ones in everyday use protect against viruses.
The primary purpose is not to protect the wearer.
Why do you think surgeons wear masks? It's not to protect themselves.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: pteridine
If by "legal actions" you mean filing a claim for compensation, you are mistaken.It will be handled like any other vaccination claim, such as they are. If your claim is denied you can go to court.
The point is that an EUA is not an approval and not being approved may just have some bearing on any legal actions.
www.cnbc.com...
The Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program “provides compensation to people who are injured or die from a vaccination, medication, device or other so-called countermeasure necessary to prevent, treat or fight a pandemic, epidemic or security threat,” according to the program’s website.
On March 10, 2020, then-Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar issued a declaration under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act that authorized that program for Covid-related claims.
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: Phage
Vaccine passports are not necessary even though the CDC now ignores exposure to the disease leading to herd immunity and pushes vaccination as the route.
I was referring to legal actions against any "Vaccine Passports" requirements.
But you do hear about how many people could die before natural herd immunity (Trump referred to it as herd mentality) is attained, assuming it ever was.
You don't hear about herd immunity, or natural immunity amongst Covid-19 recovered.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
But you do hear about how many people could die before natural herd immunity (Trump referred to it as herd mentality) is attained, assuming it ever was.
You don't hear about herd immunity, or natural immunity amongst Covid-19 recovered.
www.foxnews.com...
The Covid-19 death-rate was so minimal,
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
The Covid-19 death-rate was so minimal,
Yeah 500,000 souls. No big deal.
Ebola was much worse.
But there wasn't. Mostly because it's not very easy to contract. But if you listened to Rush Limbaugh you would have thought there was. Some major rants about it.
If there was a global Ebola pandemic, there would be good reason to be afraid
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust
But there wasn't. Mostly because it's not very easy to contract. But if you listened to Rush Limbaugh you would have thought there was. Some major rants about it.
If there was a global Ebola pandemic, there would be good reason to be afraid
I don't expect you to remember that though. Selective memory goes hand in hand it cognitive dissonance.