It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
a reply to: olaru12
Every republican i know believes in due process and equal application of the law regardless of someones politics, race, gender etc.. most of the democrats i know do not.
Every republican I know believes in the Qanon cult conspiracy theories and that the election was stolen. Most of the democrats I know do not.
originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
originally posted by: olaru12
Every republican I know believes in the Qanon cult conspiracy theories and that the election was stolen. Most of the democrats I know do not.
The election was stolen.. it is difficult to even find someone who will admit they voted for joe.
.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
All of the Republicans and some Democrats?
Maybe the election should be looked into!
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
a reply to: olaru12
Every republican i know believes in due process and equal application of the law regardless of someones politics, race, gender etc.. most of the democrats i know do not.
Every republican I know believes in the Qanon cult conspiracy theories and that the election was stolen. Most of the democrats I know do not.
All of the Republicans and some Democrats?
Maybe the election should be looked into!
originally posted by: olaru12
Every republican I know believes in the Qanon cult conspiracy theories and that the election was stolen. Most of the democrats I know do not.
originally posted by: Phage
originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
a reply to: olaru12
Every republican i know believes in due process and equal application of the law regardless of someones politics, race, gender etc.. most of the democrats i know do not.
President Trump on Wednesday voiced support for confiscating guns from certain individuals deemed to be dangerous, even if it violates due process rights.
“I like taking the guns early, like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida ... to go to court would have taken a long time,” Trump said at a meeting with lawmakers on school safety and gun violence.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second,” Trump said.
thehill.com...
No.
so now you are a fan of Trump?
Quite often, actually.
Or are you just acknowledging he spitballs with some stupid ideas at times.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude
No.
so now you are a fan of Trump?
Quite often, actually.
Or are you just acknowledging he spitballs with some stupid ideas at times.
But perhaps you should check the context of my post to understand why I posted it.
originally posted by: Phage
But perhaps you should check the context of my post to understand why I posted it.
do you support taking guns from sane innocent ppl or not?
originally posted by: Phage
I do not. Not without due process.
originally posted by: Phage
There are rightists everywhere too, for that matter.
That doesn't mean I make friends of them, does it? Either variety.
But if you define leftist as someone who is simply left of you, so be it.
I feel bad that your friends arent more diverse it must be boring.
originally posted by: TheLieWeLive
a reply to: network dude
Per the nytimes story it’s not solely Geatz who is being investigated but a political ally?
The three people said that the examination of Mr. Gaetz, 38, is part of a broader investigation into a political ally of his, a local official in Florida named Joel Greenberg, who was indicted last summer on an array of charges, including sex trafficking of a child and financially supporting people in exchange for sex, at least one of whom was an underage girl.
Are they both being looked at for the same crimes or is it separate?
This is looking like he is being accused because he was around Mr. Greenberg.
The feds claim Greenberg reportedly used state government databases to access personal information of women with whom he had 'a sugar daddy' relationship, including an underage girl.