It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: olaru12
Sort of like what was done with Hillary....remember? No mention of an indictment or trial, just thousands of people screaming "lock her up"
you making an attempt at taking the moral high ground is meaningless...well done indeed, hypocrite!!
She broke many laws big time and the FBI DOJ under Obama wouldn't even put her under oath...lol OK
We do get upset when people like Biden, his son, Hillary etc get differential treatment to not even look at the evidence...lol Give me a break..
originally posted by: olaru12
And trump had plenty of time to file indictments and investigations during his tenure. What did he do? Did he give them preferential treatment as well. He sure used them as a campaign slogan but did nothing. trump knew he wasn't going to do anything but you fools bought into his BS. Chumps!!
originally posted by: Phage
Yup. And Trump's DOJ did nothing. Probably because they found there was nothing.
Was it ever "Trump's" DOJ.
Policy, yes. Law no. As has been well discussed. Being stupid still is not a crime.
Using a personal server to go outside of what she was officially suppose to use by law for her position, and to have it unsecured with classify on it to have it all hacked... I'm sure there is no laws broken there.
It had something to do with the implication of releasing funding as "encouragement", actually.
All is good my friend...just funny how Trump is impeached for just asking to have Hunter and Biden looked into...
Yes. He is a cagey sumbitch. But he certainly discussed the two things in close proximity, conversationwise.
Oh I didn't know Trump said he would not issue any funds until Biden was looked
originally posted by: Phage
Laws were not broken, policy was. Had she still been in the State Department there was recourse. Since she wasn't, there wasn't. The DOJ knew this.
Been through this. Not into it anymore.
Classified on a unsecured private server is policy?
originally posted by: Phage
Yes. He is a cagey sumbitch. But he certainly discussed the two things in close proximity, conversationwise.
But he wasn't convicted, he's obviously innocent.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: network dude
FBI is now more of a MOB organization than a non-biased law enforcement organization.
originally posted by: olaru12
And trump had plenty of time to file indictments and investigations during his tenure.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xtrozero
Policy, yes. Law no.
Being stupid still is not a crime.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: network dude
I don't have anything to gain or loose with regard to Gaetz, so whatever happens will happen. But this story is strange enough that the truth needs to come out before we finish the lynching, or do we just disregard that part?
I haven't been following this very much...is there even a woman yet? Seems like the left will "Kavanaugh" anyone on the right in a second while having the nothing to see here hand wave if the person is liberal.
Greenberg and Gaetz shared girlfriends, according to interviews with friends and associates who know the two men, and Greenberg introduced him to young women he met on SeekingArrangement. One friend who spent time in the company of both men said he was of the impression that the two engaged with women in more of a “sugar daddy relationship” where money changed hands, though it wasn’t explicitly prostitution.
“I know Joel and Matt paid some of their bills, rent, tuition, things like that,” the friend said. “This is a thing that happens when you’re successful and you have these relationships: ‘Are we not supposed to help these women who mean something to us and that we care about?’ Is that prostitution? Maybe if you’re a Puritan.”