originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: redchad
Nuclear War has no winners, except maybe flies, rats and cockroaches.
How do you know?
How many nuclear wars (no need to capitalize this, by the way) have you lived through?
My point is, that 'nuclear war' doesn't exist, except as an idea. It's not real, it has never happened. So you can't really know anything real about
it - you can only write conjecture, just like the rest of us.
There's not that much proof that nuclear bombs even exist - and that 'proof' is highly dubious. The CLAIMS about what 'nuclear bombs' do, do not
correlate with facts or realities of alleged nuclear bomb detonation sites.
The nuclear bombs are supposed to wipe away all buildings and trees and such with that extreme heat and blast waves - but if you look at photos of
Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the alleged nuclear boming, the results are 100% identical to Tōkyō photos after FIREBOMBING.
You can clearly see buildings and ruins still standing, as well as multiple trees standing up.
And all the biologically impossible nonsense, like 'eyes melting', has not been proven to ever have actually happened. Or your shadow somehow being
imprinted on a structure, etc.
The more you research this whole 'nuclear bomb' stuff, the more peculiar implausibilities and unproven 'horror story'-like claims and details you are
going to find. It's all very weird.
Then you look at the 'convincing video evidence', and it looks like someone just points their camera at a sunset or regular bombing, and the clouds
are apparently 100% unaffected by 'the most powerful weapon in existence'.. they don't move or get disturbed at all by a nuclear bomb amidst them.
When you look at all that and realize just how unconvincing it actually is (and how most of those 'nuclear explosions' so expertly captured on camera
although it's supposed to be a devastating bomb that wipes off everything around it, and so bright, no film could contain that kind of bright light
without over-exposure have some suspicious groups of 'smoke lines' next to them so often)... well, one has to wonder: is there ANY actual proof of
existence of nuclear bombs?
Consequently, you might start asking, is there ANY actual proof of possibility of nuclear war, if the existence of nuclear bombs is even slightly
The governments have EVERY incentive to lie to the masses, so the official stories should never be believed without a good reason to do so. (Fear is
not a good reason)
The official story about nuclear bombs don't seem to hold water very well, but the claim of existence of such of course benefits TPTB. Also, it gives
a GREAT story to keep masses in fear; "Nuclear war ALMOST started several times, but thankfully, this brave blahblah stopped it!" and everyone gives a
silent thank you in their minds to this brave warrior that didn't start a war.
It's such a juicy narrative, you would have to wonder; even if nuclear bombs and everything about the official story about them is 100% true, would
all this NOT have been fabricated, if it wasn't true? It's just such a perfect story; weapons SO powerful they can never be shown to the world, so
their existence can never be proved, but look, we destroyed japanese cities so many decades ago that camera tech could only give grainy, lores,
unfocused, unbelievable-looking crap as proof, but believe us anyway...
It's the perfect lie; the most powerful weapons whose existence can never be proved. If you were a 'world leader', wouldn't you want people thinking
you have such weapons, even if you didn't?
Just asking.. I don't really know. For all I know, they could be just as real as our whole physical reality.. (then again, researching THAT all the
way to the sub-atomic level and taking into account higher levels of existence makes things seem a bit shaky)
But I am just pointing out, that the lie.. eh, STORY itself, makes proving of the story impossible, so none of us can truly REALLY know whether those
things exist or not, and thus, without living through an actual nuclear war (like some japanese guy lived through both of the supposed 'nuclear
explosions', and how there's not much radiation nowadays in Nagasaki OR Hiroshima, although they were SUPPOSED to be super radioactive for thousands
of years, and animals and plantlife even in Chernobyl is doing phenomenally well., although that was also not supposed to be possible)..
..so please refrain from making such absolute statements of things that may not even exist, ok?
edit on 2-6-2021 by Shoujikina because: (no reason given)