posted on Feb, 26 2021 @ 01:32 PM
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: Archivalist
We really need a pre-programmed autonomous rover that can be sent there. Then it can carry out its programming faster and send back data on a semi
continuous basis.
It had enough autonomy, programming, and processing power to find its own best landing spot after photographing the ground as it was falling towards
it, then comparing that photograph to an existing map to pick the best landing solution (smoothest, safest landing spot in the immediate area around
it).
It also has some autonomy while roving. As ArMaP mentioned, this rover, as well as Curiosity Rover, have built-in semi-autonomy to be able to
identify a potential hazard and find the best path around that hazard.
Perseverance actually has more driving autonomy than Curiosity. But no, it doesn't go wherever it wants. The science team at JPL look for interesting
targets and then gives the rover a general path to that target. The rover then (on its own) selects the best path to take to that target. If the
general path given by JPL happens to have a dangerous rock or sand pit in the way, Perseverance knows enough to avoid those hazards on its own.
Which is helpful, since there is a speed-of-light delay in messages back and forth that is currently 11 minutes (ranges from 4 minutes to 24 minutes
depending on how far mars is from earth). So the people at JPL can't be waiting for Perseverance to tell it there is something in the way. It could
take 24 minutes for a message from Perseverance saying "there's a rock in my way" to get to earth, then have the person back on Earth figure out a
path around the rock, then have another 24 minute speed-of-light time delay for the new instructions to get back to Perseverance -- as you can see,
that would make traveling on Mars way too slow.
So instead the rover itself can find the best path, on its own, semi-autonomously.
edit on 2/26/2021 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)