Gina Carano Interview Released

An informative 1 hour interview with Gina Carano. I am sure Disney will not be pleased at the information she has divulged.

Cancel culture for the win it appears.

a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

a reply to: infolurker

This whole cancel culture has got to stop! I don't know what the hell has happened to people to make them so hateful and controlling. It should not be tolerated. Sick of these poor excuses for human beings. Gena will rise above this and has many people on her side.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

And "not renewing her contract" over things said that I found to be far from offensive, earned the consequence of me canceling my Disney plus subscription.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

That's a short view of a problem with long consequences.

Why do employers feel the need to police some behavior and not others? The result of mob reporting and piling on social media hate-fests will end up, like other blunt cultural tools adopted by the far left and made possible by emergent technology, will come to bite them. This weaponization of viral outrage already gave birth to Q and Trump. If you thought those were bad just wait until the next mass movement to come out of this.

I don't particularly care about Hollywood or any of the media empires surrounding it, but this is bigger than Hollywood.

It's a pretty great interview. I sense cultural change is starting to happen.

There is also a series underway about the life of George Washington, with a special emphasis on his spirituality.
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: infolurker



I have worked on many Disney films, Gina is better off being let go. I see her entering conservative politics.

But the reality is... if they write the pay checks, play the game.

a reply to: infolurker

Gina has a strong moral center. Just the opposite of what Disney culture is based on.

I watched about half of it, I thought she got screwed from the start, and it rings true, so watching the rest wasn't necessary..really I switch off as Ben was going into his 3rd or 4th ad I think Ben should be the "fast talking" guy at the end of tv commercials, the guy that spit out the legal disclaimers.

Disney can do what it wants I guess, and I don't have to watch Disney, they suck in my opinion!

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

And "not renewing her contract" over things said that I found to be far from offensive, earned the consequence of me canceling my Disney plus subscription.

I've enjoyed Disney media for years without a subscription, no reason to change that now. Their mistake is thinking Gina would be silenced by terminating her contract. All they did was eliminate any leverage they had in the first place, and now she has zero obligation to anyone except herself.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

And "not renewing her contract" over things said that I found to be far from offensive, earned the consequence of me canceling my Disney plus subscription.

I've enjoyed Disney media for years without a subscription, no reason to change that now. Their mistake is thinking Gina would be silenced by terminating her contract. All they did was eliminate any leverage they had in the first place, and now she has zero obligation to anyone except herself.

Gina should start her own faith based, conservative production company and give Disney a run for their money.

a reply to: grey580

The question does beg asking...

What did Disney not like about it. I've seen her commentary...it was plain historical fact. Did they find that her calling out the effects of long term govt. propaganda too close to the truth??

What did she say that was so very, very wrong, that she must suffer the consequences?

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: grey580

The question does beg asking...

What did Disney not like about it. I've seen her commentary...it was plain historical fact. Did they find that her calling out the effects of long term govt. propaganda too close to the truth??

What did she say that was so very, very wrong, that she must suffer the consequences?

I'm kinda puzzled too, it took some real mental gymnastics to twist what she said into anything remotely anti semitic, or anti lgbtqrstuv..wx..y and z. This stuff is getting dumb.

a reply to: seagull
I'd say her stance didn't sit well with the larger portion of their customer base so they appeased to them.

In the contracts I have had the chance to work on, a person doesn't have to say/do something that is wrong or untrue for the company to be seen in a "negative light" and that is often "at their sole discretion".

Everyone saying, "I see nothing wrong", means nothing.

originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: grey580

The question does beg asking...

What did Disney not like about it. I've seen her commentary...it was plain historical fact. Did they find that her calling out the effects of long term govt. propaganda too close to the truth??

What did she say that was so very, very wrong, that she must suffer the consequences?

That’s the obvious question that these Communist/Socialist/Marxist apologists will never, never ask themselves. Not even when it eventually comes to be a “consequence” for them as well, because by then they really will have lost ANY ability to think for themselves. Right now most of them still have the ability to think independent thoughts- they just refuse to. By the time it is their turn to be steam rolled, they will truly be baby-minded slobs.

a reply to: daskakik

That still begs the question...

Why did anyone see anything wrong with what she put out there??

Are people so uncomfortable with the possibility that we're being, enmass, duped by propaganda.

The fact that todays reality is disturbingly similar should be, well, disturbing.

Yet people are offended?? Really??

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

MARTIN NIEMÖLLER.

originally posted by: KansasGirl
By the time it is their turn to be steam rolled, they will truly be baby-minded slobs.

They already are drooling idiots in diapers sucking binkies, that's what cost someone espousing calm, common sense and wisdom a job.

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker

You mean Consequence Culture.

She said things her employer didn't like. So they chose not to renew her contract.

But it never stops there. Next the "outrage mob" will do their damnedest to make sure she never works again.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: seagull
I'd say her stance didn't sit well with the larger portion of their customer base so they appeased to them.

In the contracts I have had the chance to work on, a person doesn't have to say/do something that is wrong or untrue for the company to be seen in a "negative light" and that is often "at their sole discretion".

Everyone saying, "I see nothing wrong", means nothing.

You think that this is because of a larger portion of their customer base? No, it's people on the internet who have their identity wrapped up in being offended all the time over imagined offenses.

If everybody saying "I see nothing wrong" means nothing then why are a tiny minority of people screeching constantly about acceptable speech dictating how companies do business?

I'm not saying it's illegal. I'm saying it's stupid that the whole country and multi-million dollar companies are being led around by the nose by a bunch of never-satisfied attention whores on Twitter and social media. There is never enough appeasement for these little militant turds and eventually somebody is going to figure it out.

I'll be happy to see the long-term consequences of their full conversion to social justice progressivism.

a reply to: seagull
From what I understand she has taken a pro-conservative stance and this was just part of it. I have read it said that she was comparing conservatives in the US today with jews in nazi germany.

We can't control what people choose to take offence to.