It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I only know of one way to do it. Add the parenthesis first... you get 4. then 2*4=8. So 8 / 8 = 1.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Basically, the presentation is all about whether or not the parenthetical goes into the numerator or the denominator.
Instead of me trying to type math equations, I'll let you deal with Teikiatsu's chicken scratch.
Better bracketing or simply presenting the problem in a fraction notation would clear this up.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
If it looks weird, sounds weird, tastes weird, then it’s just plain simple weird.
He hits 2 out of 3 straight off the bat. The other one? Well I’ve yet to meet him, so unable to provide an answer on that....yet.
originally posted by: myselfaswell
a reply to: Sookiechacha
There is only 1 answer.
16.
It's probably already been said, but I'd like to add that this all just multiplies the division that is racism. That's my takeaway on it at least. The remainder of my thoughts on the subject will just subtract from the conversation.
originally posted by: Edumakated
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Mrs. Jones has 2 oranges, and she picks 2 more. How many oranges does she have now?
No. None of her oranges is a quark.
What's the answer?
1...
I only know of one way to do it. Add the parenthesis first... you get 4. then 2*4=8. So 8 / 8 = 1.
There are two different ways to perform it
The concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false, and teaching it is even much less so.
The concept of mathematics being purely objective is unequivocally false, and teaching it is even [much less] MORE so.