It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ted Cruz Asks Impeachment Managers if Kamala Harris Incited Riots from Black Lives Matter Protests

page: 6
74
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I don't have to prove anything. The House impeachment managers did it.



Actually. . .they didn't because the jury chose to aquit.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Alien Abduct

No one said that the impeachment charge was based only one speech, only on the few minutes of Trump's speech that day This impeachment was about how it played with a long planned scheme to overturn the election and incite insurrection.

Again, according to McConnell's official statement...

“The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.


“This was different.

“This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters’ decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.
“The unconscionable behaviour did not end when the violence began.


This impeachment trial was never about one speech. It was about a planned violent attack against the United States of America.


edit on 14-2-2021 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Alien Abduct




So this makes it true?


It makes it history. It makes it an important part of an historical congressional record.

Historians won't be studying what Alien Abduct said in an Above Top Secret thread, they'll be studying the historic record, the congressional record, and what the party of president being impeached said about the outcome of their president's impeachment and trial.

Here's a little bit.


“The leader of the free world cannot spend weeks thundering that shadowy forces are stealing our country and then feign surprise when people believe him and do reckless things.

“Sadly, many politicians sometimes make overheated comments or use metaphors that unhinged listeners might take literally.

“This was different.

“This was an intensifying crescendo of conspiracy theories, orchestrated by an outgoing president who seemed determined to either overturn the voters’ decision or else torch our institutions on the way out.
“The unconscionable behaviour did not end when the violence began.

“Whatever our ex-president claims he thought might happen that day… whatever reaction he says he meant to produce… by that afternoon, he was watching the same live television as the rest of the world.

“A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name. These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags, and screaming their loyalty to him.





“It was obvious that only President Trump could end this.

“Former aides publicly begged him to do so. Loyal allies frantically called the Administration.

“But the president did not act swiftly. He did not do his job. He didn’t take steps so federal law could be faithfully executed, and order restored.

“Instead, according to public reports, he watched television happily as the chaos unfolded. He kept pressing his scheme to overturn the election!

“Even after it was clear to any reasonable observer that Vice President Pence was in danger… even as the mob carrying Trump banners was beating cops and breaching perimeters… the president sent a further tweet attacking his vice president.
“Predictably and foreseeably under the circumstances, members of the mob seemed to interpret this as further inspiration to lawlessness and violence.



74 million Americans did not engineer the campaign of disinformation and rage that provoked it.

“One person did.


Transcript


Yeah and they will be smarter than you because they will actually read the speech in question and come to the same conclusion as the Senate. Hahaha

What McConnell said doesn't mean $h!T. Same as when a prosecutor tries to put an innocent man in jail they will drum up a story to fit their case. But guess what? Usually (and in this case) justice prevails and the innocent party is acquitted. The case was B.S. and less than flimsy. They had nothing but lies and it fail horribly. It doesn't matter what the prosecutor or even McConnell says at all. Who gives a $h!T.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Alien Abduct




Yeah and they will be smarter than you because they will actually read the speech in question


LOL
They'll be smarter than you, because they'll read that it was about weeks, even months of cultivation, not one speech.



What McConnell said doesn't mean $h!T. Same as when a prosecutor tries to put an innocent man in jail they will drum up a story to fit their case.


Except McConnell wasn't the prosecutor, he WAS the brilliant defense that got Trump off. He delayed the trial and then claimed that the delay made the trial out of the Senate's jurisdiction, even though the Senate voted otherwise, and the Senate sets the trial rules.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I don't have to prove anything. The House impeachment managers did it.



Actually. . .they didn't because the jury chose to aquit.


Not because the Impeachment managers didn't make their case, they did, according to McConnell. The Republicans acquitted because "they" disagreed with the Senate vote, and "felt" that the trial was out of the Senate's jurisdiction.
edit on 14-2-2021 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I don't have to prove anything. The House impeachment managers did it.



Actually. . .they didn't because the jury chose to aquit.


Not because the Impeachment managers didn't make their case, they did, according to McConnell. The Republicans acquitted because "they" disagreed with the Senate vote, and "felt" that the trial was out of the Senate's jurisdiction.


And you are a liar.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Not according to Mitch McConnell. It's a matter of public record, the congressional record.
edit on 14-2-2021 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I don't have to prove anything. The House impeachment managers did it.



Yep

By aquitting the President

Innocent of ALL charges !!

TWICE!
edit on 14 2 2021 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 07:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

Not according to Mitch McConnell. It's a matter of public record, the congressional record.


For the record. when politicians talk, you believe them now.

Nice.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

It doesn't matter if I believe McConnell is being sincere, believes what he says or if he says things to make his donors happy. The only thing that matters is what is on the official record. And, the official congressional record says that McConnell says that Trump did it.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The official record states:

Innocent
Not guilty
All charges dropped

Twice

Evidence was FAKED

Officially

(And YOU support and applaud the official record)
edit on 14 2 2021 by Breakthestreak because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

It doesn't matter if I believe McConnell is being sincere, believes what he says or if he says things to make his donors happy. The only thing that matters is what is on the official record. And, the official congressional record says that McConnell says that Trump did it.


I understand that you're afraid of disagreeing with what your masters tell you to think.

It must be upsetting.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:06 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

It must difficult to pretend to be so myopic and intellectually challenged.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

It seems you’re the one who’s being myopic

The official record states the evidence was FAKE and the President is innocent of all charges

Hilarious.

The people of the future will look upon the dEmocrat’s poorly



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: DBCowboy

It must difficult to pretend to be so myopic and intellectually challenged.



You're speaking poo-poo words.

I get it.

You're an anti-freedom leftist that hates the Constitution and America.

I just don't understand why you aren't in China. . . . or are you?

Hmmm. . . . .

Makes sense. . . .



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Alien Abduct




Yeah and they will be smarter than you because they will actually read the speech in question


LOL
They'll be smarter than you, because they'll read that it was about weeks, even months of cultivation, not one speech.



What McConnell said doesn't mean $h!T. Same as when a prosecutor tries to put an innocent man in jail they will drum up a story to fit their case.


Except McConnell wasn't the prosecutor, he WAS the brilliant defense that got Trump off. He delayed the trial and then claimed that the delay made the trial out of the Senate's jurisdiction, even though the Senate voted otherwise, and the Senate sets the trial rules.



I have a question for you. I bet you won't answer it.

Do you suppose those people will read the part where it says Trump was acquitted? Yes or no.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:51 PM
link   
Certainly if this was a criminal trial a jury would lock him up.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 08:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: ras321
Certainly if this was a criminal trial a jury would lock him up.


Or they’d throw it out on the basis the prosecution falsified evidence

Which they did



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 09:06 PM
link   
Karma is a biatch for Democrats, they could not get Trump for collusion, they could not get him for inciting violence, I wonder if Pelosi will try one more time, I swear that swamp creature dreams with Trump every night.

Sadly now the Democrats will turn America into ca ca, just like the two times impeachment on Trump did to them, turn them in ca ca.



posted on Feb, 14 2021 @ 10:16 PM
link   
The Democrats have been obsessed with getting Trump from the moment he ran for President until the present moment. They are obsessed with making him, his family and voters miserable in any way that they can, including taking away freedom of speech, de-platforming conservatives. They want it all their way or no way at all. The American people will not stand for that. We have a voice and it will be heard.

Oh and...Where is Hunter?



new topics

top topics



 
74
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join