This is the website of Dr. David E. Martin who is intimately familiar with the records of the US Patent Office. He spoke at length in the documentary
Indoctornation, also known as Plandemic II.
He has now refined and organized all the material from the Patent Office regarding patents for controlling SARS Coronavirus, and he has done a
terrific job. It turns out that USPO has more than 5100 patents relating to controlling the SARS Coronavirus. This has been going on for a very long
The resulting dossier is solid grounds for indictment of Anthony Fauci, Ralph Baric of UNC, and a few others.
One must download the dossier in PDF, but it is very informative and useful. If we had one conscientious prosecutor in the US, Fauci would be under
edit on 8-2-2021 by Salander because: (no reason given)
LOL, you quote a USA Today article out one side of your mouth, and call David Martin a Barnum fan.
Surely truth is stranger than fiction.
What Martin has done is what all conscientious journalists should do. Arm themselves with facts and knowledge, analyze them and reach a plausible
The facts are that Fauci, Baric and others have been making overt actions (one part in the legal definition of a conspiracy) for many years to bring
this covid fiasco to fruition, along with healthy profits for its nominal 'vaccine'.
And along the way, as the record shows, Fauci and his co-conspirators violated several other US statutes including FTC rules.
You're probably not interested, but it costs nothing to get the Fauci Dossier. Not a penny.
Your post is innuendo that it costs something, that Martin is making money somehow, but that is because your mind is too tightly sealed to entertain
anything resembling the truth. You seem devoted to Dr. Fauci, and prefer to NOT read any facts that would lower your esteem for the charlatan.
Typical, but still a pity.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of AboveTopSecret.com.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.