White House Reporters: Biden Team Wanted Our Questions in Advance

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jlafleur02

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TheBoomersRBusted
a reply to: ketsuko
There is nothing unusual about checking questions ahead of time, to be able to answer them. W did so, I expect others. When she says she will circle back if she doesn''t have info, she does so. Her job is to answer questions for the Administration. She does so. Oh Boring!

Thanks. Honestly, if I had a question — I’d want an accurate answer.

What’s wrong with both? A combination of requested/submitted questions and on the spot questions.

This is just something else to bitch about.

Very true, Unless they don't call on the reporter that is asking a tough question. How many "tough" questions have been asked?

In this administration or previous?

Biden’s only been President for 15 days.

A bit too early to judge, don’t ya think?

Well I think the video touches on the times she didn't have an answer, and to me it seems like a whole lot for that period of time. Not even sure how tough the questions were, just that she seems to not have an answer to lot of them. So yeah it's little early to judge, I mean look at the patience that was shown with Trump and how everyone gave him a fair shake before judging lol. I can't even type that with a straight face. It's always do as I say not as we DID with the dems!

a reply to: rickymouse
I love the way you are always supporting the very people who are bringing a communist coup to our country. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t realize that is what it is?

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: rickymouse
I love the way you are always supporting the very people who are bringing a communist coup to our country. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t realize that is what it is?

I am saying that Trump opened himself up to the liberal media to twist his words into something they did not say. What has that got to do with Communism. It has been policy that during a presidential breifing for many decades that the press could only ask questions that were pre-approved and a script by the president could be followed to answer, both Democrats and Republican presidents have followed that requirement for decades, maybe even a century. But Trump was different, and the press jumped on it to tear him apart.

Nothing to do with communism, in fact, if Trump would have followed that practice, he would be serving his second term and the left communists and socialists would not have gotten ammo to use against our Capitolistic form of Republic we have here in America. I May have been a moderate liberal for most of my life, but I now completely disagree with the direction the left is going in, they are very unintelligent, they believe things that are being twisted to match their beliefs and their beliefs are not right. Change needs to be slow and steady, it should be conservative and some liberal aspects brought in and tested to make sure it does not screw things up, the liberals are throwing in all kinds of crap at one time....that leads to disaster and makes it hard to identify problematic changes that will tear our society to pieces.

I am now a strong conservative, but I am not by any means hard or far right, the far right is almost as bad as the far left. I said almost.

a reply to: [post=25747760]tkwasny[/post ... what lie since 1865..?

originally posted by: rickymouse

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: rickymouse
I love the way you are always supporting the very people who are bringing a communist coup to our country. Should I give you the benefit of the doubt that you don’t realize that is what it is?

I am saying that Trump opened himself up to the liberal media to twist his words into something they did not say. What has that got to do with Communism. It has been policy that during a presidential breifing for many decades that the press could only ask questions that were pre-approved and a script by the president could be followed to answer, both Democrats and Republican presidents have followed that requirement for decades, maybe even a century. But Trump was different, and the press jumped on it to tear him apart.

Nothing to do with communism, in fact, if Trump would have followed that practice, he would be serving his second term and the left communists and socialists would not have gotten ammo to use against our Capitolistic form of Republic we have here in America. I May have been a moderate liberal for most of my life, but I now completely disagree with the direction the left is going in, they are very unintelligent, they believe things that are being twisted to match their beliefs and their beliefs are not right. Change needs to be slow and steady, it should be conservative and some liberal aspects brought in and tested to make sure it does not screw things up, the liberals are throwing in all kinds of crap at one time....that leads to disaster and makes it hard to identify problematic changes that will tear our society to pieces.

I am now a strong conservative, but I am not by any means hard or far right, the far right is almost as bad as the far left. I said almost.

Im pretty sure the Press asked Trump many questions which were not approved, and they even harassed him. The Press were against him from the start and continually did so to him and his family. It had nothing to do with what questions were preset. Your anti-Trump bias really shows. And that’s fine, I just see it for what it is. In fact the Democrats wanted to impeach him on Inauguration Day because they knew they couldn’t control him
as a puppet the way they can control Biden, who is an empty shell reading a teleprompter and doesn’t know what he’s signing. And now the House is censuring Marjorie Greene for wanting to impeach a president who doesn’t even know what he is doing. Why did they not censure Watters fir instigating violence against President Trump and his supporters. If you can support them then yes you would be supporting totalitarianism.
Suggesting that it is Trumps fault because not following script is the reason he did not serve a second term is patently ridiculous when we all know(even if we don’t admit it) that the reason is the attacks of the press and never trumpers and the Deep State and the massive election fraud perpetrated by the DNC and other interested parties.
For the sake of pointed discussion though, I don’t understand what you mean by “some liberal” things brought in and tested. Did you mean “classically liberal” as in the Founding Fathers or did you mean liberal as in promoting progressive ideals such as the so-called “ stand down” of the military to root out the Patriots who support our real President and the Constitution? Haven’t we had enough of that ? The dnc has itself become the bastion of fascist censorship employing Big Tech to do their bidding, just as Communist China used yahoo and google to build their Great FireWall of China.
As a conservative ( lets just say that you actually are, which I don’t believe), how could Trump have done things differently policy wise ? The Deep State couldn’t get him to start a new war with Syria. He built the border wall to help control the massive illegal migration including the caravans, and to stem the tide of illegal drug trafficking and child trafficking, not to mention making it harder for Chinese military or other terrorists to invade(that is surely in keeping with the purpose of the Constitution to provide for the “common defense”. He brought jobs and manufacturing back to the US. He did many things. What would you have wanted him to do in the Covid plandemic? Should he have sent the national guard to put down the riots when the states didn’t want him to stop it? The states could have asked for help and yet they let Antifa and blm riot and burn the cities down. What would you have done ?

originally posted by: keenmachine

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jlafleur02

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: TheBoomersRBusted
a reply to: ketsuko
There is nothing unusual about checking questions ahead of time, to be able to answer them. W did so, I expect others. When she says she will circle back if she doesn''t have info, she does so. Her job is to answer questions for the Administration. She does so. Oh Boring!

Thanks. Honestly, if I had a question — I’d want an accurate answer.

What’s wrong with both? A combination of requested/submitted questions and on the spot questions.

This is just something else to bitch about.

Very true, Unless they don't call on the reporter that is asking a tough question. How many "tough" questions have been asked?

In this administration or previous?

Biden’s only been President for 15 days.

A bit too early to judge, don’t ya think?

Well I think the video touches on the times she didn't have an answer, and to me it seems like a whole lot for that period of time. Not even sure how tough the questions were, just that she seems to not have an answer to lot of them. So yeah it's little early to judge, I mean look at the patience that was shown with Trump and how everyone gave him a fair shake before judging lol. I can't even type that with a straight face. It's always do as I say not as we DID with the dems!

Maybe — but, I am not interested in quick responses from government.

I don’t think quick responses from a government “official” proves anything.

Antagonists with negative radar and intent — are just annoying.