Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to Prove on Feb 9th that Former Presidents can be Tried by the Senate.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: queenofswords
He was hastily Impeached by nothing but a because-we-want-to bunch of radical politicians with severe TDS. It was a farce and everybody knows it.

Yeah? Okay? It still happened and now he can send out the winners he has now to defend him at the Senate trial. Was so hoping it'd be the A team of Powell, Giuliani and Wood.

Lol
Too easy even just in this thread stonecutter
Funny you attempt to run away from such


Yeah
Ok

a reply to: shooterbrody

That's me 'defending' it? That's me laughing at it, the comical **** show that it was.

Try again.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
No
Seen you "laugh" here, that ain't it stonecutter.

Your defense of such is disgusting.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Nice try, but not really. Let me know when you find me 'defending' this like you claimed. This is the kind of stuff that happens when you interject yourself into a conversation you weren't a part of.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Lol
Freedom to interject

Lol
Shout them down stonecutter
Defending the cancel culture as well?
How enlightening

a reply to: shooterbrody

I didn't say you weren't free to interject, you seem to have a serious reading comprehension issue which is why you are confused. Let me know when you find me 'defending' what you claimed, shouldn't be too hard since you said it happened multiple times.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Done
Just here
Yeah?ok?

Lol

a reply to: shooterbrody

You made the claim and now are being disingenuous. If you don't want to get asked to provide proof don't make claims you cannot back up.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I provided proof from this thread.
Like a round earth, you simply don't believe such, oh great potentate stoneformer.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
I provided proof from this thread.

Proof of me finding the process funny? Yeah, we covered that. Now show me where I 'defended' it.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Done
And
Done

Dem defender.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Yeah, you are done, since you still haven't backed up your claim. It's comical to watch someone confuse schadenfreude with support.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Your quote is proof enough.


Your ring has no power here stonecutter

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Your quote is proof enough.

Yeah, proof of me enjoying the political theater. Let me know when you find me defending something.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus


I have
You did

Own it

a reply to: shooterbrody

No, all you've done is conflate schadenfreude with something you contrived. I think once you educate yourself on the definition of that word you should also look up 'nuance'.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
No thank you!

You should simply own your posts.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
You should simply own your posts.

I do, every single one of them, you should do the same and back up your claims.