It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Today my colleagues and I reintroduced a constitutional amendment to impose #TermLimits on Members of Congress. The amendment would limit U.S. senators to two six-year terms and members of the U.S. House of Representatives to three two-year terms.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: infolurker
We know that won't happen in a million years. But, it kind of says, "The People aren't happy with Congress these days, and are making noises". I think Congress's approval rating is about 13% right now. Not good. Not good.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: infolurker
Clearly what the people want and clearly what will be shot down by the peoples representation.
Cuts right to the heart of what's wrong with the US.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: DBCowboy
I would assume they would be the mentally challenged.
So, you might want to hold back on the teeth slapping.
originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: infolurker
We know that won't happen in a million years. But, it kind of says, "The People aren't happy with Congress these days, and are making noises". I think Congress's approval rating is about 13% right now. Not good. Not good.
originally posted by: Kaiju666
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: infolurker
Clearly what the people want and clearly what will be shot down by the peoples representation.
Cuts right to the heart of what's wrong with the US.
Why can't this be introduced as something to vote on? Let's pretend Dominion doesn't exist for a second.
originally posted by: infolurker
I think all sides can agree on this one (maybe). Of course I assume this will go nowhere as I doubt members from either party will vote to limit their ability to receive lobbyist money and campaign contributions to only a few years.
Anyone not agree with this and why?