Biggest Democrat Donors

Or...

Why the media will never criticize the Democrats.

There's been a lot of threads on ats about the media hypocrisy towards America's new president and its previous one. Many people expecting the media should give a fair and unbiased account.

Well sadly, it's never going to happen and to understand why, you need go no further than the list of Democrat donors.

www.opensecrets.org...


So let's take a look through some of the important names.

Right off the bat we get

Michael R. Bloomberg
City of New York, NY
New York, NY $152,264,750

Whoo boy that's a hell of a donation. I'm sure many people recognize Michael Bloomberg but what we're most interested in for the purposes of this thread is his holding company.

en.wikipedia.org...

Now apart from a fairly hefty portfolio of news and media companies, they also have several investments in marketing data and tech infrastructure.

Most of bloomberg's media properties are focused on financial and political news. All of the news from his properties are highly biased towards biden and co.

Ok...next name on the list

Thomas & Taylor Steyer
Fahr LLC/Tom Steyer
San Francisco, CA $69,057,099

So let's take a look at Fahr LLC



Now, if I were the conspiracy minded kinda fellow, i'd say that's an awfully conspicuous list of places and things to have donated to given recent controversies.

Furthermore, many of Fahr LLC's holdings stand to profit heavily off of Biden's climate plans.

Next up Facebook's cofounder

Dustin & Cari Moskovitz
Asana Inc
San Francisco, CA $48,828,012

Who happened to have left facebook in 2008 to found Asana which currently markets a product allowing one to easily track work hours from home, a product that has gained significant traction during lockdowns.

Next up

Karla Jurvetson
Karla Jurvetson MD
Atlanta, GA $27,499,057

A doctor and long time political activist and Democrat supporter who has the curious distinction of

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Jurvetson also was an early supporter of the only two U.S. Senate candidates who were successful in changing their seats from Republican to Democratic control in 2018, Jacky Rosen in Nevada and Kyrsten Sinema in Arizona.[31][27] By a margin of 56,000 votes, Sinema became the first Democrat that Arizona elected to the Senate in 30 years.[34][35]

Again, given all the uproar over the election, this seems significant.

Next we've got

S. Donald Sussman
Paloma Partners
Ft Lauderdale, FL $26,144,700

Another media mogul with a hefty portfolio of media companies but also Paloma Partners is a large property managment and hedge fund investment company.

whalewisdom.com...

They've got offices and businesses around the world including an office.in Hong Kong opened.in 2017. Paloma Holdings seems like it could use some more investigation and probably deserves a thread on its own.

Next up, secretive hedgefund with a massive portfolio of holdingsband longtime professional lobbyist

James H. & Marilyn H. Simons
Renaissance Technologies/Simons Fdtn
New York, NY$26,142,147

Next up

Fred Eychaner
Newsweb Corp
Chicago, IL $19,054,600

newsweb corp

They own a bunch of ethnic news papers and news agencies around america as well as several fox and NBC stations. Needless to say, they're about as MSM as you can get.

Stephen Frank Jr. & Susan Z. Mandel
Lone Pine Capital
Greenwich, CT$17,706,052

Lone Pine Capital is considered one of the most successful and wealthiest hedge fund corporations in america.

www.holdingschannel.com...



I hope this picture speaks for itself. If not, just think of the deplatforming events of late then take another look at that list.

The list is much longer and I do urge people to look through and follow the money. From both sides whoever you voted for. Do the same thing for the Republican donors.

Because, these are the people who bought your election. For anyone who thinks such a thing just isn't possible. Just follow the money.

It's not a grand conspiracy, it's just untouchable billionaires openly throwing #tons of money everywhere to get what they want.

Lobbyists won the election. They did it openly for anyone who gave enough of a # to watch.

a reply to: dug88

IMO we don't need to follow the money.

We need to get rid of it.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

Gotta find it to get rid of it.

a reply to: dug88

Money can’t buy a lot of things in life and judging from those dipsh!ts, they have a lot of money but no brains.

People who want to make money off a candidate usually will donate to their campaign. Global warming propaganda will get the Democrats lots of money from those suckers....suckers because they will probably never even get their money back because the Liberals abandon their backers quite often, throwing them under the bus when another donor comes around with more money. That is politics, but conservatives actually follow through more with paying back their donors for their contributions.

People seem to need to learn the hard way not to trust liberals in stuff like this.

Nonsense. The Democrat party is the party of the common working man. Hell, their top guy right now is even named Joe!

Just a great group of folks looking out for the little guy.

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: LookingAtMars

Gotta find it to get rid of it.

Not really, I think it should be cut off altogether, add term limits for congress and throw out voting machines.

Then I think the system may fix itself with a little help from the people.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

I agree with this 100%. The question is mostly. How? Any anti-lobbying bills are universally rejected about as quickly as their drafted, the system is nearly completely corrupt from the top down. Even local level politicians seem to be bought and sold and tend to be the most responsible for selling out their communities.

How do people even begin going about cutting off that money?

I'm not trying to be defeatist. But it's a massive problem to overcome and the only way to overcome it is to think towards solutions.

a reply to: dug88

The best answer I have is civil disobedience.

People shutting down stuff peacefully and legally, at least brings attention.

Someone smarter and wiser than me needs to update MLK's playbook, IMO.

originally posted by: caterpillage
Nonsense. The Democrat party is the party of the common working man. Hell, their top guy right now is even named Joe!

Just a great group of folks looking out for the little guy.

That was funny.

originally posted by: caterpillage
Nonsense. The Democrat party is the party of the common working man. Hell, their top guy right now is even named Joe!

Just a great group of folks looking out for the little guy.

Guys such as union pipeline workers. Newly unemployed....

Both are on the Committee of 300....A globalist secret society..a reply to: dug88

originally posted by: gb540

originally posted by: caterpillage
Nonsense. The Democrat party is the party of the common working man. Hell, their top guy right now is even named Joe!

Just a great group of folks looking out for the little guy.

Guys such as union pipeline workers. Newly unemployed....

Exactly! Now those working men and women have a lot more time to spend with their families.
They should be grateful that their union reps pressured them into voting democrat.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

The best answer I have is civil disobedience.

Possibly....but in what way? Riots and protests will either be co-opted or shut down with force. Any legitimate protests will be downplayed or slandered by the media machine and the average person will turn further away from any kind of action.

People shutting down stuff peacefully and legally, at least brings attention.

It brings only the kind of attention the media wants it to bring as demonstrated pretty clearly this year with the discrepancies in the

BLM/antifa, Capitol riot, most recent antifa protests

Reporting over the last year. For the majority, the media's description of those events are those events. This is what any kind of public demonstration trying to bring meaningful change is facing.

Because you gave your thoughts on this though, i'll give mine.

I don't think you can cut off the money and I don't think you can fix the system. I think the system needs to be totally rebuilt from the outside by any and everyone that wants to. Empower as many people as possible to exist as independently of the whole corrupt system as possible so it collapses on its own.

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: LookingAtMars

The best answer I have is civil disobedience.

Possibly....but in what way? Riots and protests will either be co-opted or shut down with force. Any legitimate protests will be downplayed or slandered by the media machine and the average person will turn further away from any kind of action.

People shutting down stuff peacefully and legally, at least brings attention.

It brings only the kind of attention the media wants it to bring as demonstrated pretty clearly this year with the discrepancies in the

BLM/antifa, Capitol riot, most recent antifa protests

Reporting over the last year. For the majority, the media's description of those events are those events. This is what any kind of public demonstration trying to bring meaningful change is facing.

Because you gave your thoughts on this though, i'll give mine.

I don't think you can cut off the money and I don't think you can fix the system. I think the system needs to be totally rebuilt from the outside by any and everyone that wants to. Empower as many people as possible to exist as independently of the whole corrupt system as possible so it collapses on its own.

I wouldn't know where to start but it's not riots and protests that worked best.

It was things like blacks going in and using a white bathroom or sitting at the front of the bus.

I don't know how you update that for today. But I think your thoughts are valid and some seem to have a place in the updated playbook.

a reply to: LookingAtMars

It was things like blacks going in and using a white bathroom or sitting at the front of the bus.

I don't know how you update that for today. But I think your thoughts are valid and some seem to have a place in the updated playbook

Well, the first thing I think anyone could do that could help themselves is to constantly educate themselves and become skilled in things that can independently earn you money or a living.

The overwhelming goal seems to be to make people dependent and helpless. Keep people dumbed down and reliant on big tech or government. Lock out knowledge and data and keep people to the narrative. A population of followers is a lot easier to control than a population of educated people capable of fending for themselves.

Just because technology is being used against humanity doesn't mean we can't use it. All this technology is made by people, people who were just average people at one point. The technology being used to control people, can be used to empower them, for now. The longer people wait to take advantage of it the harder it'll be. Technology is increasingly being locked out and licensed and being sold as a service.

The more people who want real change for the world empower themselves, support their communities, come together and support eachother the better chance we all have.

a reply to: dug88

Well, the first thing I think anyone could do that could help themselves is to constantly educate themselves and become skilled in things that can independently earn you money or a living.

That is a great point and I agree 100%.

If we could somehow legally break away from supporting the system as much as possible. Then come together in groups and organizations to support each other, with no middle man.

That kind of thing is out there already at different levels and in different ways. The problem is TPTB do everything they can to discourage that kind of action. They would see it happening and hamper or outright stop it.

They got us locked down now, once 5G and the IoT is in place, there will be no hope for freedom, IMO.

Skynet will rule over the Earth.

a reply to: dug88


I love open secrets I have their site in my favorites since back when I joined this site. They have a lot of good information.

a reply to: dug88

They are calling the White House very angrily..

mobile.twitter.com...