So sex offenders can live by schools now?

Fuher Whitmer has signed into Michigan law; a bunch of new things regarding sex offenders.....

One of them “removing” the prohibitions of living near a school.

Removing prohibitions for offenders from living, working or loitering near school property or “student safety zones.” No longer requiring an offender’s tier classification to be included on the public website. Law enforcement personnel who willfully fail to periodically report on offenders would face a penalty.

More here at Link

Well I guess the Pedos in office are finally bringing “unity”..... this is a major problem. And I’ve heard no outcry about it

Where's the Teachers' Unions at ? 😃

a reply to: xuenchen

Celebrating.... apparently. Children’s welfare is no longer necessary I guess?

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: xuenchen

Celebrating.... apparently. Children’s welfare is no longer necessary I guess?

Nah, they were smart enough to read the article...unlike the OP.

Sounds like Whitless. Damn she's a waste of space.



Giving sex offenders no more than three days to register or report status changes in person with local law enforcement.
Requiring offenders to report all email addresses, social media names or other forms of “internet identifiers.” That would not apply retroactively to offenders prior to July 1, 2011, but anyone required to register after that date must comply.
Requiring all telephone numbers and vehicles used by the offender to be reported. Previously, they didn’t need to report those used on a less regular basis.
Allowing email addresses, social media usernames and other identifiers to be published on a public sex offender registry.
Removing prohibitions for offenders from living, working or loitering near school property or “student safety zones.”
No longer requiring an offender’s tier classification to be included on the public website. Law enforcement personnel who willfully fail to periodically report on offenders would face a penalty.

a reply to: peck420

Explain?

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: peck420

Explain?

No.

If you are going to make a thread, do the bare minimum....read your own damn posted material.

4 Years of this starting tomorrow.

Sodom and Gomorrah

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Ask yourself this, how did this bill get to her to sign from the Republican held legislature?

Since you didn't even read your own article:

The approval of changes to the state’s Sex Offender Registration Act fulfills a 4-year-old mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals, which ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose new restrictions on people convicted before the Act was updated.

House Bill 5679, sponsored by Rep. James Lower, R-Greenville, addresses that problem and was approved in the Senate by a 21-17 vote during the Dec. 16 session. The Michigan House approved the bill 80-24 on Dec. 2.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Wasting no time are they..

To the residentd lunati...I mean lefties.

Oooown it!

Be proud of it.

Lets say it in unity "We are the part of pedos and kiddiesniffers"

Rejoice in the progressivness.

Maybe they can get a few dragqueens/trans to read for the kindergardeners as well.

That would be a hooot.

I guess republicans can be pedos as well .. who knew!

a reply to: samuelsson

It must pain you to know this was a Republican-sponsored bill.

No. It increases penalties against, from what I can read.

The proposed amendments to SORA in House Bill 5679 are:

Giving sex offenders no more than three days to register or report status changes in person with local law enforcement.

Requiring offenders to report all email addresses, social media names or other forms of “internet identifiers.” That would not apply retroactively to offenders prior to July 1, 2011, but anyone required to register after that date must comply.

Requiring all telephone numbers and vehicles used by the offender to be reported. Previously, they didn’t need to report those used on a less regular basis.

Allowing email addresses, social media usernames and other identifiers to be published on a public sex offender registry.

Removing prohibitions for offenders from living, working or loitering near school property or “student safety zones.”

No longer requiring an offender’s tier classification to be included on the public website. Law enforcement personnel who willfully fail to periodically report on offenders would face a penalty.

On a more personal note, my neighbor 3 houses down was very friendly and welcoming to us.
Always stopping to chat.
What a nice guy, I thought.
Guess what...violent sexual assault of a minor on his rap sheet.
My kids due in 3 months.
Now moving, because chainsaw art is tempting me.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: samuelsson

It must pain you to know this was a Republican-sponsored bill.

It really doesnt.

Kinda messed up either way.

I cant wait for Joe to start sniffing kids on live TV though. How about u?

originally posted by: samuelsson
Kinda messed up either way.

What's messed up is you didn't read the very short article in went into some canned, Q-inspired, 'Pedo Dems' rant when it turns out it was your boys who sponsored the bill.

I cant wait for Joe to start sniffing kids on live TV though.

I'm sure you can't and I bet you'll only be watching for 'research purposes'.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Did I mention political sides? I said pedos in office....

So regardless if it’s mandated or not , it’s still changing the laws.....

, you think convicted sex offenders shouldn’t have to register online or not be kept from schools??

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

I for one think the sex offender registry needs to be updated.
One of my employees has a son on the offender list. He was 18 and his girlfriend was 15. Her parents called the cops and there ya go.

Now this guy is 25 and is saddled with this forever.
He is absolutely no threat to anyone.

Now a molester is a different story.

a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

BREAKING: Hunter Biden has confirmed his move to Michigan.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Where in the world are you moving to get away from it? Siberia?
I’m sure you’ve seen the maps of offenders in your area. Odds are you’re surrounded.
I have a cluster, 3 different people, on one road about a half mile from me and I’m considered living in the country.

Good luck brother.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: samuelsson
Kinda messed up either way.

What's messed up is you didn't read the very short article in went into some canned, Q-inspired, 'Pedo Dems' rant when it turns out it was your boys who sponsored the bill.

I cant wait for Joe to start sniffing kids on live TV though.

I'm sure you can't and I bet you'll only be watching for 'research purposes'.

The pedo stuff isn't some q bs.
Try doing some research.

You have a very interesting outlook on the subject.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand

Ask yourself this, how did this bill get to her to sign from the Republican held legislature?

Since you didn't even read your own article:

The approval of changes to the state’s Sex Offender Registration Act fulfills a 4-year-old mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals, which ruled that it was unconstitutional to impose new restrictions on people convicted before the Act was updated.

House Bill 5679, sponsored by Rep. James Lower, R-Greenville, addresses that problem and was approved in the Senate by a 21-17 vote during the Dec. 16 session. The Michigan House approved the bill 80-24 on Dec. 2.

OK, but...., couldn't she just say "No, I won't sign it" ?