Remote viewing wealth

07-14

Iv given somewhat a location as I dont think many remote viewers go on ATS much or any online form. But I could be wrong. It will be hard for some and easy for others. I included details, it will weed out the imaginations of non remote viewers as true remote viewing skills you weed out imagination from clues. a reply to: Blue Shift

a reply to: unknown32

The reason you don't get remote viewers online (or elsewhere) is because it's nonsense and there is no such thing.

a reply to: midicon

nonsense , so why did both the US and USSR spend millions researching it for over 20 years if it doesnt work ?

seems like a waste of money , normally if a project isnt worth it they can it after a month

a reply to: sapien82

I think it had a lot of propaganda value. Perhaps a little like carrots and radar, who can say?

Stick a few psychic charlatans in with gullible scientists and you get nonsense. Such is the way.

Remote-Viewing has been validated by such mainstream journals as "Nature" (the U.K. equivalent to "Scientific American"). The problem has always been that different RV-ers report different "views" when viewing the same "target". Some have postulated this involves viewing parallel universes (within the Multiverse) or different possible quantum histories. And then there are of course famous RV-ers who are "flakes" (for lack of a better term) and give the subject a bad discredited name.

Standard-RV is viewing a target as a 3rd party observer. Extended-RV is viewing through the eyes of a living subject. Remote-Influencing is confusing the mind of a "target" or injecting false memory screen implants into him/her. Remote-Healing is just what it sounds like.

Conservative civil engineer Tom Mahood (who achieved fame/infamy for exposing flaws in the Lazar story) believes in Remote-Viewing as it was demonstrated to him => www.stealthskater.com... .

More on RV is archived at => www.stealthskater.com... .

A proposal to permit real-time interactive RV between a RV-er and a view-ee is at => www.stealthskater.com... .

How exactly did "Nature" validate RV?

Afaik all positive RV experiments suffered from cuing and confirmation, hindsight biases.

As such RV is not different than palm reading.

"Remote viewing" is a very general term. It isn't really a patented idea that came out of a military program, nor is it the sole providence of any particular institutes or "groups" modern or otherwise.

Dowser's have been doing it for a very long time. Dowsers are just like everyone else, they like a good mystery to solve. Ancient Egypt, lost children, water, treasure, and so on. Dowsers also like to help others.

Dowsers use an instrument, generally a bent piece of wire or a pendulum over a map of somewhere else. There are also people who don't need an instrument. Either naturally or they simply grew out of the need for an instrument.

Generally dowsers also keep to themselves because other people often ridicule what is not understood. There are other dangers in contests and experiments.

Now "Dowsing 101", or if you wish; "Remote Viewing 101", should include a section on thoughtforms. Anyone who knows the doing of thoughtforms can create a target. A good teacher might create a thoughtform of a person and give it a medical history. The students are then asked to dowse the medical history of the target.

Talented people generally get the medical side of the test more or less. But that is not the point of the test. The point of the test is to find out if the student can figure out if they are dowsing a thoughtform or a real person.

And then there is The Dowser's Dilemma.

Now what happens if the dowser, or remote viewer, finds where the bodies are buried? Who are they going to tell? How are they going to explain how they knew where the body was and cause of death or other details?

That is The Dowser's Dilemma - who are they going to tell?

Let's say the explanation of how they knew is accepted, and they don't get thrown in prison for murder. If it gets out what they can actually do, they get recruitment or targeted as a threat.

So most folks who can do this stuff quietly disappear from public view or write occasionally on anonymous message boards like ATS.

Perhaps this is why remote viewing et al, gets very little confirmation?

Surely this is in the wrong forum.

What has this got to do with UFOs or Aliens?

a reply to: mirageman

Been wondering that myself.

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: Blue Shift
could we train ourselves up using the declassified CIA documents ?
or we wont be able to as Im, sure they would have left out some pertinent details

Not if we know they're CIA documents. Spoiled it already. The trick is to know basically nothing about what we're looking for. What, where, when, who? None of that. If we know, then we're going to attempt to guide our thoughts to them, and that won't work.

Inside a toolbox inside a shed.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Hey I dont mean to try and view classified CIA documents , what I mean is
use the CIA's training manual that they collated when they researched and operated under the stargate project

operation stargate wiki

and then the CIA documents on stargate

operation stargate CIA