It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: Boadicea
F those leaders speaking out about it now.
Now is too late.
originally posted by: loam
a reply to: Boadicea
History says fat-chance.
It's going to get a whole lot worse, before it gets better, unfortunately.
originally posted by: Ohanka
Every head of state or government will be disgusted by the fact a corporation has the power to simply silence a serving head of state, even if they don’t say it. All of them, from North Korea to Iceland. With the possible exception of Trudeau.
It is an outrageous state of affairs, and if nothing else shows the US is not sovereign and merely a vassal state to a corporate oligarchy.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: Boadicea
Pretty sure a good portion of these leaders were all for what happened to Trump.
Yes, more than a couple have been more than a little critical of Trump.
And it should be noted that that's fair enough. Everyone is allowed their own opinions, including their opinions of Trump and/or his policies.
It was when they realized they could be easily targeted by a Multinational Corporation that they suddenly became suspicious.
It does seem to work out that way a little too often. But it is what it is.
I suspect foreign leaders became at least a little concerned when the Biden laptop stories were suppressed. If I were a foreign leader, and especially a would-be foreign leader, I would be pretty concerned to know that Big Tech could and would suppress incriminating information about my opponent. But really anyone and everyone needs to be concerned about suppressing information.
trump doesn't do politics....he wants you to do what he says, period, even if it's against the law.
Use your head for something besides a hat rack, Trump is far and away more law abiding than your commie Leftist leaders.
FFS
in dec, 2016 he paid a 25 million dollar fine because he lost a lawsuit where he cheated students out of their money. it was called fraud....maybe he could come by and cheat you out of your money?
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: Ohanka
Every head of state or government will be disgusted by the fact a corporation has the power to simply silence a serving head of state, even if they don’t say it. All of them, from North Korea to Iceland. With the possible exception of Trudeau.
It is an outrageous state of affairs, and if nothing else shows the US is not sovereign and merely a vassal state to a corporate oligarchy.
yeah right...he might have to break his silence by going a few feet to the press room, with reporters and cameras and talk there...you know just like other presidents have done....you really need to start making sense, you sound as if you're a cultist.
originally posted by: new_here
a reply to: Boadicea
Your post caused me to think of something I hadn't before. Leaders in other countries, rightfully concerned about how things went down, and with (as you say) possible inside info on the details of it, could well be the ones to lift the veil of it all. They could be the ones to bring it all to light. What would they stand to lose?
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: Ohanka
Every head of state or government will be disgusted by the fact a corporation has the power to simply silence a serving head of state, even if they don’t say it. All of them, from North Korea to Iceland. With the possible exception of Trudeau.
It is an outrageous state of affairs, and if nothing else shows the US is not sovereign and merely a vassal state to a corporate oligarchy.
yeah right...he might have to break his silence by going a few feet to the press room, with reporters and cameras and talk there...you know just like other presidents have done....you really need to start making sense, you sound as if you're a cultist.
originally posted by: LogicalGraphitti
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: seeker1963
a reply to: Boadicea
Pretty sure a good portion of these leaders were all for what happened to Trump.
Yes, more than a couple have been more than a little critical of Trump.
And it should be noted that that's fair enough. Everyone is allowed their own opinions, including their opinions of Trump and/or his policies.
It was when they realized they could be easily targeted by a Multinational Corporation that they suddenly became suspicious.
It does seem to work out that way a little too often. But it is what it is.
I suspect foreign leaders became at least a little concerned when the Biden laptop stories were suppressed. If I were a foreign leader, and especially a would-be foreign leader, I would be pretty concerned to know that Big Tech could and would suppress incriminating information about my opponent. But really anyone and everyone needs to be concerned about suppressing information.
trump doesn't do politics....he wants you to do what he says, period, even if it's against the law.
Use your head for something besides a hat rack, Trump is far and away more law abiding than your commie Leftist leaders.
FFS
in dec, 2016 he paid a 25 million dollar fine because he lost a lawsuit where he cheated students out of their money. it was called fraud....maybe he could come by and cheat you out of your money?
I must have missed that somehow. Oh, I know, it was Trump that tweeted it and the Twitter keepers deleted it thinking it was propaganda.
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: uncommitted
Poland recently introduced a law that fines corporations for censoring the speech of it’s citizens.
They seem quite comitted to safeguarding free speech. Far more than most others.
originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: uncommitted
Lies, huh? Okay. I linked the source. People can check it out for themselves.
As for the rest of your comment, okay. So we've been told ad nauseum infinitum. And people are rightfully and reasonably expressing their outrage and contempt. Which is actually the subject of the OP. I did not address the legalities, especially in terms of the laws in every nation.
The topic is what it is: Foreign leaders' reactions. Very critical reactions.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: uncommitted
Poland recently introduced a law that fines corporations for censoring the speech of it’s citizens.
They seem quite comitted to safeguarding free speech. Far more than most others.
No they are not, hence their clashes with protesters against their extremely harsh abortion laws - they didn't want the public to be able to talk about that, how do you balance that out?
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: Ohanka
a reply to: uncommitted
Poland recently introduced a law that fines corporations for censoring the speech of it’s citizens.
They seem quite comitted to safeguarding free speech. Far more than most others.
No they are not, hence their clashes with protesters against their extremely harsh abortion laws - they didn't want the public to be able to talk about that, how do you balance that out?
What does violent activists attacking polish police have to do with poland’s stand against corporate censorship?