Twitter Permanently Bans The President

originally posted by: fencesitter85


Also, you lost.

We all have, only you don't realize it yet.

a reply to: loam

8chan? ATS maybe?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Exactly.

I'm glad we're all in agreement that Twitter can censor anyone they want at any time they want and many are cheering the actual censorship of people.

So odd.

Jack Dorsey just wants a pure leftist echo chamber with no opposing viewpoints.

originally posted by: Specimen88
Twitter getting rid of Trump, is like not putting butter or not butter on toast.

Tell this to DB...

Do it.....please....

Do it...

"Why don't people understand the Constitution compels private companies to have to do business with everyone, even against that private companies wishes, regardless of the circumstances!?"

That's the argument that people have??

a reply to: theBLESSINGofVISION

Yeah...and people who bring that argument up in regards to bakeries and salons are called bigoted etc. It's always the double standard argument.

Speech has consequences.

Censoring speech has consequences.

What will they be?

Keep poking the bear...

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: theBLESSINGofVISION

Yeah...and people who bring that argument up in regards to bakeries and salons are called bigoted etc. It's always the double standard argument.

That's why there's a Public Accomodation law.

But Internet platforms are exempt.

Jack Dorsey is now our President. There's clearly no higher power in the land.

The greatest irony is the victorious left thinks they've done something modern and enlightened in furtherance of democracy and the will of the 'people', when in reality they are merely following the well worn path of literally every example of authoritarian and totalitarian governance throughout history.

For this round, The Great Experiment is dead.

Like I said earlier, dark days ahead.

originally posted by: loam
The greatest irony is the victorious left thinks they've done something modern and enlightened in furtherance of democracy and the will of the 'people', when in reality they are merely following the well worn path of literally every example of authorization and totalitarian governance throughout history.

For this round, The Great Experiment is dead.

Like I said earlier, dark days ahead.

Well stated.

First Amendment was taken off life support today.
Come dance on it's grave.

a reply to: DBCowboy

So you see no issues in a private company censoring what are, technically official government statements by a world leader?

originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: DBCowboy

So you see no issues in a private company censoring what are, technically official government statements by a world leader?

I have a huge issue, but I don't write the laws.

Further, weren't you the one that convinced me of the appropriate use of section 230?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
First Amendment was taken off life support today.
Come dance on it's grave.

Just to repeat, the 1st Amendment is designed to protect political speech, not the crazy ramblings of a anti-American seditionist.

Additionally, private businesses can refuse to serve anyone they want, for no reason at all. Although inciting riots is a pretty good reason.

Have you ever actually read the 1st Amendment?

Massive censorship today.



Big tech oligarchs did this to a sitting president and gone straight Stalin-esque because there's a lot of big, world changing & (Dem) career ending info about to come out. What, I have no idea but sources say.

a reply to: Blue Shift

I don't have a Twitter account so I don't know. . .

But I can bet the Iranian leaders have a Twitter account.

BLM has a Twitter account.

Antifa has a Twitter account.

ISIS has a Twitter account.

China has multiple Twitter accounts.

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: IAMTAT
First Amendment was taken off life support today.
Come dance on it's grave.

Just to repeat, the 1st Amendment is designed to protect political speech, not the crazy ramblings of a anti-American seditionist.

Yeah...nothing more PRO-American than censorship.