It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Justice John Roberts Gives Trump the Middle Finger - Saving the USA Will Not Involve SCOTUS.

page: 11
77
<< 8  9  10    12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 11:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Telos
Yeah keep saying that to yourself.


I will, because it's true.

But keep living in your LARP fantasy where reality doesn't occur....



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 05:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed


Not to patriots. We know the truth when things happen and don't need to be told by someone else what the truth is like you do.


My post went way over your head, didn't it?

Still, you're the one with the incisive mind.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 05:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Telos
The reality is a stolen election...


Was it? One where every time a court case came up they had no evidence to present? You just can't wrap your head around the fact that President Great Brain Flotilla lost to a rather dull candidate.


That's the point, nobody presented any evidence yet. The dismissals were all based on technicalities.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Man you guys are honestly just looking utterly tragic and desperate now.

You lost. Get over it.

Backing this grifting loser to the bitter end just shows how weak your judge of character is.

And SCOTUS will not subvert the Constitution just because you think they should. You're un-American.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Telos
The reality is a stolen election...


Was it? One where every time a court case came up they had no evidence to present? You just can't wrap your head around the fact that President Great Brain Flotilla lost to a rather dull candidate.


That's the point, nobody presented any evidence yet. The dismissals were all based on technicalities.


The evidence was presented in the filings as so many have pointed out so many times.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: fencesitter85
Man you guys are honestly just looking utterly tragic and desperate now.

You lost. Get over it.


Its a good change of pace after watching the other guys looking utterly tragic and desperate the last few years with their inability to accept their loss and just get over it.

Unfortunately I think this is going to be how it goes every 4 years for a while. Each side taking their turn looking utterly tragic and desperate after they loose the presidency and unable to accept it.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 06:36 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

I must have missed the 60 or so lawsuits brought to try to overcome the election results and install Hillary Clinton as President.

Do you have a link to those? How about calls for Civil War because she won, do you have any of those?

Calls for military tribunals? I mean, she did win the popular vote by about 3 million, so there was justification ...

Thanks for your help.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 07:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

For example? Which case was decided on the evidence? It'd be great to read that opinion, if it were provided.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 07:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
a reply to: Gryphon66

For example? Which case was decided on the evidence? It'd be great to read that opinion, if it were provided.


They were all decided on the basis of the evidence presented and the relief sought.

What do you think a judge basis their decisions to deny petitions on? The evidence presented.
edit on 27-12-2020 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 07:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

I must have missed the 60 or so lawsuits brought to try to overcome the election results and install Hillary Clinton as President.

Do you have a link to those? How about calls for Civil War because she won, do you have any of those?

Calls for military tribunals? I mean, she did win the popular vote by about 3 million, so there was justification ...

Thanks for your help.


Hillary and DNC skipped the lawsuits and went straight to trying to persuade the Electoral College electors to be faithless; to eather vote for her instead of Donald Trump or vote for another Republican candidate.

Hillary also commissioned a political research dossier from a feign intelligence operative filled with unverified accusation against Donald Trump and known Russian disinformation. Then leaked that document to the press in order to undermine the incoming administration.

In their final days the Obama administration picked a political fight with the Russians over their alleged interference in the 2016 elections that his administration did nothing to stop. He did nothing to resolve the dispute with the Russians and left it to the next administration to deal with.

Obama also took a world tour to worn our allies to distrust the Trump Administration.

Than the DNC spent the next 3 years loudly supporting an investigation into whether or not Trump conspired with the Russians to steal the 2016 elections. The result of that investigation being a few Russian Bots never showing up for their trial; an American gerinal being railroaded in to make a confession that he lied to the FBI during their investigation, which was later overturned when it was discovered that the FBI acted inappropriately; and finally the drunken testimony by the lead investigator in front of congress where he could not recall the particulars of his investigation.

When the DNC's first attempt at impeaching Trump over aligations he conspired with the Russians to steal the 2016 elections failed; they then spent the next few months in a last ditch effort trumping up allegations that Trump tried to strong arm the Ukrainian government. Allegations that the victim, the Ukrainian government, denied happened and allegations that the DNC's own lawyer warned would lead to the most narrow and subjective impeachment in US history (including the Clinton sex scandal).

I could go on and include unsubstantiated sexual assault allegations against a SCOTUS nominee; Failed NDA lawsuits brought by a Porn Star that resulted in the Porn Star being ordered to pay almost $300,000; and on and on and on.


But your right Hillary and the DNC didn't spend a month and a half seeking legal remedy through our court system trying to uncover what they saw as voter fraud....



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 07:38 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

So, there were no lawsuits trying to overthrow the Constitution and the rule of law from Clinton then?

That's what I thought.

The rest of your gish gallop is too far outside the topic for me to respond to here.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 07:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

So, there were no lawsuits trying to overthrow the Constitution and the rule of law from Clinton then?

That's what I thought.

The rest of your gish gallop is too far outside the topic for me to respond to here.


Sure; since I never said that there where lawsuits trying to overthrow the Constitution and the rule of law from Clinton, I really don't understand the point you are trying to make.

What I did say was:


Its a good change of pace after watching the other guys looking utterly tragic and desperate the last few years with their inability to accept their loss and just get over it.


My "gish gallop" (I'll have to look up that saying) is a clear demonstration of this point.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

Gish gallop is a tactic in debate where you bring up multiple counter examples or points of such volume and diffusion that your opponent cannot possibly or reasonably respond to them all (in formal debate, responses are timed.)



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 08:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
That's the point, nobody presented any evidence yet.


That's what happens when you don't have any.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

Gish gallop is a tactic in debate where you bring up multiple counter examples or points of such volume and diffusion that your opponent cannot possibly or reasonably respond to them all (in formal debate, responses are timed.)



Yea I looked it up
thanks for the education. You really can learn something new every day



However in this case I don't think its correctly being applied. My argument is that the Democrats spent years "not getting over" their 2016 loose. My argument to back up that claim has to bridge that time period and can not be addressed with just one example.

I do understand that you take exception to some of my interpretations of events; we have all talked them to death the last four years. But I really can't see how any honest person could believe that the chicanery doesn't go every which way ... and that unfortunately its only getting worse.



posted on Dec, 27 2020 @ 08:28 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat

I'm fine with having a difference of opinion, and I could work with that. I think your argument was a good one precisely because you did offer a timeline of examples fact-based to structure what you were claiming.

I just can't address your arguments in detail as that would be off-topic.



posted on Dec, 28 2020 @ 10:50 AM
link   



posted on Dec, 28 2020 @ 12:49 PM
link   
Looks like saving country will not involve the DOJ either...

U.S. Dept of Justice gives itself a pat on the back for a "job well done" from 2017 thru 2020.

See first 4 posts at: twitter.com...

As the author points out, there are a few things missing.




posted on Dec, 28 2020 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanDanDat

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: DanDanDat

I must have missed the 60 or so lawsuits brought to try to overcome the election results and install Hillary Clinton as President.

Do you have a link to those? How about calls for Civil War because she won, do you have any of those?

Calls for military tribunals? I mean, she did win the popular vote by about 3 million, so there was justification ...

Thanks for your help.


Hillary and DNC skipped the lawsuits and went straight to trying to persuade the Electoral College electors to be faithless; to eather vote for her instead of Donald Trump or vote for another Republican candidate.

Hillary also commissioned a political research dossier from a feign intelligence operative filled with unverified accusation against Donald Trump and known Russian disinformation. Then leaked that document to the press in order to undermine the incoming administration.

In their final days the Obama administration picked a political fight with the Russians over their alleged interference in the 2016 elections that his administration did nothing to stop. He did nothing to resolve the dispute with the Russians and left it to the next administration to deal with.

Obama also took a world tour to worn our allies to distrust the Trump Administration.

Than the DNC spent the next 3 years loudly supporting an investigation into whether or not Trump conspired with the Russians to steal the 2016 elections. The result of that investigation being a few Russian Bots never showing up for their trial; an American gerinal being railroaded in to make a confession that he lied to the FBI during their investigation, which was later overturned when it was discovered that the FBI acted inappropriately; and finally the drunken testimony by the lead investigator in front of congress where he could not recall the particulars of his investigation.

When the DNC's first attempt at impeaching Trump over aligations he conspired with the Russians to steal the 2016 elections failed; they then spent the next few months in a last ditch effort trumping up allegations that Trump tried to strong arm the Ukrainian government. Allegations that the victim, the Ukrainian government, denied happened and allegations that the DNC's own lawyer warned would lead to the most narrow and subjective impeachment in US history (including the Clinton sex scandal).

I could go on and include unsubstantiated sexual assault allegations against a SCOTUS nominee; Failed NDA lawsuits brought by a Porn Star that resulted in the Porn Star being ordered to pay almost $300,000; and on and on and on.


But your right Hillary and the DNC didn't spend a month and a half seeking legal remedy through our court system trying to uncover what they saw as voter fraud....

LMFAO pwned

And im laughing at you Gryph, as is everyone else



posted on Dec, 28 2020 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Another federal judge who is either lazy, or blackmailed, or corrupt.

Election Case shot down just 15 hours after submission.

mobile.twitter.com...




new topics

top topics



 
77
<< 8  9  10    12  13 >>

log in

join