The Next President Could Be Chosen on January 6th 2021 by V.P. Mike Pence.

originally posted by: Ook33
a reply to: Gryphon66

You are deeply wrong. Deeply.

I'm deeply wrong that BIden won the election, the Electoral College elected him, and that he'll be confirmed by Congress and become President on Jan. 20th?

Nah. That's just reality.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm deeply wrong that BIden won the election

When you admit you have the best vote fraud organization.

And that you don't need people to vote for you.

It should be clear he didn't win the election, he stole it.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'm deeply wrong that BIden won the election

When you admit you have the best vote fraud organization.

And that you don't need people to vote for you.

I should be clear he didn't win the election, he stole it.

Fifty states disagree with you, as do 306 Electors.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Don't count your chickens until they come home to roost.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Gryphon66

Don't count your chickens until they come home to roost.

See you on Jan. 20th.

originally posted by: LookingAtMars
a reply to: Gryphon66

Don't count your chickens until they come home to roost.

Those who are planning, and those of us who are "following" the planners actions, understand why the White House told all staff and employees to cancel their plans for moving out, and for seeking new jobs next month.

WH staff & employees told to cancel departure plans: www.thegatewaypundit.com...

Because the activities/actions pointing to President Trump being re-elected are not being broadcast by 98% of the organized news media, most Americans will be totally surprised. Trump supporters will be elated. Anti-Trumpers will be angry at Biden/Dems/China for not planning their election steal well enough.

originally posted by: jrod
...
At the end of the day, you want the guy with over 7 million less votes to be President. That in insanity!

Unlike you I actually want the guy that will keep the Republic intact instead of transforming it into a socialist hell hole you dream of every day.

The fools keep being the idiots that want a pair of clowns that want to transform the U.S. into a dictatorial socialist regime by abolishing the EC, abolishing/defunding the police while giving loyalist civilians full police powers. Not to mention "packing the Supreme Court, and making a socialist nation with a failed socialist economy a new U.S. state, and a socialist/liberal CITY into another states so that no republican/conservative President is ever elected...

If anybody thinks Pence will do the right thing you are sadly mistaken.

He’s deep state, just like almost all of the people Trump has surrounded himself with for four years. Why???

Trust Sessions.....Trust Barr.....Trust the Plan....7 D Chess.....

What a joke. Good Americans have been fooled.

originally posted by: Signals
If anybody thinks Pence will do the right thing you are sadly mistaken.

What exactly do you think Pence can do?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

You are either lying or completely ignorant if you think Biden is going to.push a socialist agenda. He is one of the more moderate Democrats and this is why the DNC went with him and rigged the primaries against Bernie.

That said, the US practices socialism (mostly for the rich in the form of corporate bailouts and tax waivers). The most successful countries in Europe all practice socialism to an extent.

Capitalism is not always good, look at healthcare for example. Using the capitalism model, the US pay much more for much less, while the rest of the developed world with their socialized health care pay much less.

You are basically using socialism as a scare word but the reality is you have no idea what you are talking about.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Signals
If anybody thinks Pence will do the right thing you are sadly mistaken.

What exactly do you think Pence can do?

Nothing..I am referencing the original post.

a reply to: jrod

You are either lying or completely ignorant if you think Biden is going to.push a socialist agenda

Biden does not control the narrative. You are looking at a deepstate asset. Deepstate agenda and ideology is what you should be looking at if you want to understand what has been at the heart of the political system.

What political ideology would you say the CIA has for example.

a reply to: Gryphon66

That's true. You also can't conclude that something happened because someone said it did. In the case in point, the claims are not even held up in court BY THE ATTORNEYS bringing the cases. Doesn't that tell you something?

It tells you something if the evidence is being looked at. Most of the evidence has never been opened in the courts of law. Dosen't that tell you something?

originally posted by: purplemer

It tells you something if the evidence is being looked at. Most of the evidence has never been opened in the courts of law. Dosen't that tell you something?

It tells me the court doesn't have the time or inclination to bother with frivolous barratry.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Gryphon66

That's true. You also can't conclude that something happened because someone said it did. In the case in point, the claims are not even held up in court BY THE ATTORNEYS bringing the cases. Doesn't that tell you something?

It tells you something if the evidence is being looked at. Most of the evidence has never been opened in the courts of law. Dosen't that tell you something?

Sixty cases have been brought to judges many appointed by Trump; they have reviewed the material and dismissed it. Doesn't that tell you something?

a reply to: Gryphon66

Sixty cases have been brought to judges many appointed by Trump; they have reviewed the material and dismissed it. Doesn't that tell you something?

As I said the information presented is not beeing looked at. That tells you a lot more. But as you will. If you dont think objecitve computer forensics that empirically states the election was hacked should be sumissble in a court of law. Thats all good.

But from where i am standing. You are on the wrong side of the line. I support freedom and transparacny. Keep your corruption and tyranny.

a reply to: purplemer

Yes, I heard saw what you said. I've seen 7,583 other iterations of the same specious claim.

When a court reviews a submitted case, the merits and basis of the case are determined BY THE JUDGE it was submitted to.

Sixty times these claims of fraud, election tampering, etc. have been heard, 60 times they've been rejected by State and Federal judges, as well as our Supreme Court.

If you're calling the Allied "audit" computer forensics, well, I really can't say much to help with your reality parsing.

Thank you for acknowledging the obvious. Corruption and tyranny have been avoided in the thwarting of Trump's coup attempt.

The American Constitution and rule-of-law win again.

a reply to: Gryphon66

When a court reviews a submitted case, the merits and basis of the case are determined BY THE JUDGE it was submitted to.

Stop with this bull #. They are not looking at the merits. They are refusing to look. Why would you defend an election being not transparent. Your opinion is full of bull and has no standing in a free world.

originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Gryphon66

When a court reviews a submitted case, the merits and basis of the case are determined BY THE JUDGE it was submitted to.

Stop with this bull #. They are not looking at the merits. They are refusing to look. Why would you defend an election being not transparent. Your opinion is full of bull and has no standing in a free world.

So, in your august opinion, judges just ... what, flip a coin to decide to take a case? Many of the denials have had multiple pages of why the arguments and evidence presented were bull#. After the same garbage was presented multiple times, the courts, recognizing that these cases were reaching the level of the frivolous, dismissed them out of hand. You can find many of these detailed refusals online if you're interested. Here's a summary if you'd like to educate yourself on the facts.

Unlike you, I very rarely post my opinion, if I do, I notate it as such.