It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why is it OK for government leaders to be owned by China?

page: 9
42
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 04:21 PM
link   



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Are you a fan of the trans pacific partnership ? That’s my question .



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 04:52 PM
link   
a reply to: network dude

How about 'American government leaders' are American?

They are 'owned' by no other country, despite the insistence of those who favor totalitarianism under the false flag of strong 'patriotic' rule.

That idea of a democratic republic is in the US Constitution and has been in it from the start. The US Constitution was written to oppose a dictatorial totalitarian state - such as a monarchy or empire.

All those who oppose a democratic republic in favor of 'strong' centralized leadership, are traitors to the US Constitution.



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
Are you a fan of the trans pacific partnership ? That’s my question .


Not interested in answering your questions. Hopefully that helps with your situation.



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 05:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: olaru12

You guys come on . 95 percent of the people soak up everything the mainstream media says . They don’t get their news elsewhere . This website used to have free thought , now we have paid posters who work for the globalists . Who else would sit on ats and parrot everything our news has said for the last 4 years . They are on here 40 hours a week . Maybe they’re retired with no family . I can think of 6 that I absolutely know get paid to post their globalist thoughts on here . This is coming from someone who has no political affiliation so I’m not compromised

Hey! let me ask, you see any on the other side of that fence as obvious paid posters?..I sure do.
edit on 21-12-2020 by vonclod because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 05:41 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Ok so you’re full of it . Thanks , carry on with your unwavering support for the globalists . I don’t care about your interests . I care about having freedom . You care about your agenda . I hope it’s worth it



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
Ok so you’re full of it .


If you say so, you're not here for debate, you're here for bias confirmation.




edit on 21-12-2020 by AugustusMasonicus because: dey terk er election



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 05:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: olaru12

You guys come on . 95 percent of the people soak up everything the mainstream media says . They don’t get their news elsewhere . This website used to have free thought , now we have paid posters who work for the globalists . Who else would sit on ats and parrot everything our news has said for the last 4 years . They are on here 40 hours a week . Maybe they’re retired with no family . I can think of 6 that I absolutely know get paid to post their globalist thoughts on here . This is coming from someone who has no political affiliation so I’m not compromised


All 6 of them have failed miserably too

par for the course for the left - failure

Not one single person has had their opinion changed by one of these paid posters. Mainstream media’s narrative is garbage and regurgitating it ad nausea does nothing at all to persuade anyone



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 05:59 PM
link   
a reply to: vonclod

That’s a great question . I honestly would wager a bet on a few people . From the right I wouldn’t be that confident . I swear back in the old days there wasn’t much political talk here . It seemed to me at least that the vast majority of people here had no political affiliation. We all seemed to know that they’re all scum and they’re all bought and paid for and that they serve the globalists interests . The politicians only act like they have differences . Their goals are all the same , to serve their masters . Their masters are the ones who own the planet . The Rothschilds , Rockefeller’s , the George soros of the world . Their goal is out in the open . They want total control of everything.
So when I see people on here and It’s obvious to me they have an agenda I like to say . Honestly our political beliefs should fall in line with 95 percent of other Americans
We should ask ourself if it’s good for the American people or is it good for the global elite ? We need to start making every American decision based on what’s good for us and not the global elite

When I see people on here and there main agenda is to agree with everything the left does or the right does I have to wonder .

The control of information is of top priority to the people who own the planet . I feel like I at least can come here and argue . It won’t change the paid posters mind but it might change someone who feels like they’re being lied to by the msm who are the lapdog or so he global elite



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: chr0naut

You’re a socialist , you sit here and parrot the globalist agenda day in and day out . Try posting on cnn



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Thenail



That’s a great question . I honestly would wager a bet on a few people . From the right I wouldn’t be that confident . I swear back in the old days there wasn’t much political talk here . It seemed to me at least that the vast majority of people here had no political affiliation. We all seemed to know that they’re all scum and they’re all bought and paid for and that they serve the globalists interests

Thanks for your answer!

Things were political somewhat in 2012 when I joined, Obama being voted in for his 2nd,but definitely ramped up in 2015 and beyond. Posters provide the content, so, on one hand a few good plants can get the ball rolling, or were conversations just heading there anyway..a bit of both maybe.



We should ask ourself if it’s good for the American people or is it good for the global elite ? We need to start making every American decision based on what’s good for us and not the global elite

I think there can be a lot of nuance digging into that question. "Good for the American people" is such a broad thing, and a matter of perspective. A lot to unpack with that one, health care as an example. I think many people just do what is right for "them" at the time. (I'm a Canadian btw, fair to say I have my own bias, but try to see it from other POV)



When I see people on here and there main agenda is to agree with everything the left does or the right does I have to wonder

I hear you, some are very entrenched, and it does make you wonder. Then again, I'm a hobby type guy, I really dig into what I'm into, I could see that some people just dive in..deep
To be fair, I see even the most entrenched posters, give a bit now and then, it's more rare, but not unseen.



The control of information is of top priority to the people who own the planet . I feel like I at least can come here and argue . It won’t change the paid posters mind but it might change someone who feels like they’re being lied to by the msm who are the lapdog or so he global elite

Information is power! can do so much good, and be used against us..which it certainly is, all of us. Some of us want to sort it out, and some just happy to eat it, not even happy, but don't want to question..the answers can be depressing. I always want to sort it out, take little of the headlines I see here at face value.



posted on Dec, 21 2020 @ 09:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: chr0naut

You’re a socialist , you sit here and parrot the globalist agenda day in and day out . Try posting on cnn


I'm not a socialist.

I am a centrist capitalist.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: network dude

Ok I guess that’s two for pro trans pacific partnership . I’m not a fan . I’m a fan of nationalism . Not a fan of globalism . Not a fan of the paid posters on here who agree with the socialist left on everything . I get it the republicans are no better , that’s obvious . I can’t stand people like griff that are obviously working on an agenda , I have to type on here for free .

Just don’t sit on this website and agree with the party’s of socialism 24/7 for years and tell me I need to read an op


just be sure you read the OP before you respond as you did. This isn't a partisian hack job, this is pointing out a legitimate issue. And your dislike of the socialist agenda that is so obviously charging into our system is echoed from most of us. The few apologizers here claim to not be socialist's, but show themselves to either by lying or not smart enough to understand it.

Know your enemy, and know who's not.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 07:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: Thenail
a reply to: network dude

Ok I guess that’s two for pro trans pacific partnership . I’m not a fan . I’m a fan of nationalism . Not a fan of globalism . Not a fan of the paid posters on here who agree with the socialist left on everything . I get it the republicans are no better , that’s obvious . I can’t stand people like griff that are obviously working on an agenda , I have to type on here for free .

Just don’t sit on this website and agree with the party’s of socialism 24/7 for years and tell me I need to read an op


just be sure you read the OP before you respond as you did. This isn't a partisian hack job, this is pointing out a legitimate issue. And your dislike of the socialist agenda that is so obviously charging into our system is echoed from most of us. The few apologizers here claim to not be socialist's, but show themselves to either by lying or not smart enough to understand it.

Know your enemy, and know who's not.


Your own OP suggests there are governments owned by Chine. Would you like to give it more context so people know which countries you are referring to? Otherwise it's a meaningless post.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 07:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
just be sure you read the OP before you respond as you did.


Broheim equates breaking Trump's balls with being a socialist. I like it, I think that's funny.





edit on 22-12-2020 by AugustusMasonicus because: dey terk er election



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 11:18 AM
link   
a reply to: AaarghZombies
More like sold us out. Do not blame capitalism. If the ptb didn’t rob us then sell us out to China it would be different.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko

The right to keep and bear arms. I mean, I guess if you want to get technical, we can also have swords, but citizens armed with swords are going to have a tough time protecting themselves against tyrannical government, aren't they since government will have guns.



Citizens armed with all the assault rifles and grenade launchers in the world are going to have a tough time protecting themselves against tyrannial government, aren't they since the government will have the biggest, best armed military in the history of mankind.

Seriously, look at history. Look at the Battle of Kursk. Millions of trained, battle hardened men on each side. Thousands of aircraft. Defences hundreds of miles deep. Neither the Germans nor the Soviets would have lasted long against today's US military. What chance do Jim Bob and his hunting buddies in Y'all Qaida stand?



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: bassface09
a reply to: AaarghZombies
More like sold us out. Do not blame capitalism. If the ptb didn’t rob us then sell us out to China it would be different.


Capitalism is TPTB.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Whodathunkdatcheese
Yeah, because a bunch of goat herders with ancient russian arms were defeated in like a month by the great US war machine. Oh wait. They been at it for #in years.



posted on Dec, 22 2020 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: network dude
China is doing what they feel needs to be done. It's a smart plan. And an easy one to use for control. But I understand this much better than I would have had Trump not been president. See, we heard all about how horrible it would be for a high level official to have ties to other nations and how easily they could be blackmailed.

Now that it's not Trump in the crosshairs, it seems that issue isn't really an issue. So my question is, why? Why is it OK for Swalowswell to have ties to a hot Chinese spy and be on the house intel committee? Why is it OK for Hunter Biden to sell his name to China and other nations, when his Dad (same last name amazingly enough) just won the presidency? Why is it OK for Mitch McConnel to have a family business dependent on China? Why is it Ok for Diane Finestine's husband to do business with China when her driver of 20 years turned out to be a Chinese spy?


Why is it okay for Trump to be owned by russia?

Why is it okay for Trump to be owned by North korea?

edit on 22-12-2020 by BeenieWeenie because: Message not formatted properly




top topics



 
42
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in

join