a reply to:
trollz
I would counter balance your account with a few of my own anecdotes. I worked in my undergrad studies with a super bright young black woman on a group
literature project, and she clearly had a terrific grasp of interpreting stories. At one of my first programming jobs, we hired a terrific young black
woman who clearly demonstrated ability in writing and understanding code. I'm still connected with her via LinkedIn, and I have watched her progress
up the career chain at a large, well-known bank.
Ultimately, all we have are personal anecdotes, and the statistical facts about academic underachievement in certain population demographics, at least
in the US. I would say, there are always exceptions to every trend, and no matter where anybody stands on the notion of nature vs nurture or other
theories in sociology, it's vitally important to always deal with people on an individual basis. Individual experience is always a better indicator
than graphs and charts when it comes to personal relationships.
There are very few things that irritate me more than large-scale social experiments, racial "trouble shooting" and government/academic intervention in
education and career development. It just sets up different population segments to envy and resent one another.
We need more focus on meritocratic
metrics, and finding ways to evaluate learning/intellectual talents on an objective scale that doesn't help or hinder any particular population
group.
If statistics say that certain segments of society are lagging in test scores, then rather than tip the testing scales, shine the light on....
* reading habits
* % of time parents spend in aiding in homework/studies
* safe environment at home for learning
* encouragement and motivation on children to think about their career path
* can't be emphasized enough, reading habits!
If the above bullet-point evaluation criteria start to expose demographic trends, then we need to start understanding what are the conditions and
cause-effect relationship in certain social segments or communities that inhibit a fertile learning ground.
Poverty? Yup.
Broken home? Yup.
Criminal involvement within the family? Yup.
As a White male who checked each of the 3 boxes above, I can attest that it IS possible to compensate for those deficiencies and still succeed in
getting a job, starting a family and achieving stability. But, that is really against the odds, as it were.
The only pathway to success in the US is for members of social groups or demographics or communities to maximize positive learning behaviors and
minimize distractions and obstacles, like poverty, fractured families and criminality. You can tweak and re-calibrate test standards all you want, but
that is treating than symptom rather than the underlying sickness.