It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It's espionage. Probably made easier by a President that thought it was a good idea to cooperate with Russia on cyber-security.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: purplemer
Says this before an investigation and without evidence. Sounds like deepstate narrative to me.
Why do you say they have no evidence...lol
originally posted by: carewemust
(Joe says Hunter is the smartest man he knows.)
Really? Says you, and not the Secretary of State?? Lol OK
originally posted by: purplemer
Abosultly. Only a fool would continue falling for this. You can say what you want if you have no evidnce it means next to nothing.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
So Conservatives are now all hot and bothered with Russian hacking and the Liberals now think Russian hacking is no big deal?
OOoo what would be evidence for you? There is zero way for you to actually know without trusting someone somewhere what they say is correct.
One good thing Trump did we have to acknowledge ( even though he may have done it for the wrong reasons and is blind to Russian perfidy) is that he avoided conflict with Russia
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Gandalf77
Most sources seem to be in agreement that this attack is sophisticated enough to indicate state sponsorship
Or intelligence services.. Ie CIA
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: Willtell
One good thing Trump did we have to acknowledge ( even though he may have done it for the wrong reasons and is blind to Russian perfidy) is that he avoided conflict with Russia
If Russia is such an enemy why sell them weapon grade nuclear material. Its not Russia thats the problem here. Its the deepstate gone rogue. It started that when it assassinated JFK